How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Interior oscillation controls the harmonic gradient
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and . Let be real or complex harmonic on an open set with , . Then The constant depends only on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, an integer , an open set , a harmonic on , a point and with .
For harmonic on an open set containing and every multi-index , (Harmonic Cauchy estimates in supremum norm).
Countable Choice is the standing hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
Work under [F2] and put , which is harmonic on with the same derivatives as , in particular ; moreover for every , so .
Apply [F1] with to the harmonic function on : , with a constant depending only on and the coordinate; taking gives for every .
Summing the coordinate bounds, ; absorbing into the constant gives the assertion with a constant depending only on .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (2014) (standard reference, not scraped)