Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Negative expected finite masked-diffusion ELBO is weighted cross-entropy

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let V be finite and nonempty, m∉V, L,N≥1, 1=α0>⋯>αN=0, and let X∼μ for a probability vector μ on VL. Put S=(V∪{m})L. Conditional on X=x, let qx be the finite forward masking path law started at Z0=x: at step j, each clean coordinate survives with probability αj/αj−1 and otherwise becomes the absorbing mask m, independently across coordinates. For every position i, reverse step j, state z∈S with zi=m, and token v∈V, assume hi,j(z)(v)>0, where each hi,j(z) is a probability vector on V. Put cj=(αj−1−αj)/(1−αj) and dj=(1−αj−1)/(1−αj). Define the reverse kernel Pj by copying every unmasked coordinate and, independently across masked positions conditional on zj, assigning mass dj to m and mass cjhi,j(zj)(v) to each v∈V. Use the point mass at mL as terminal prior and the decoder Dec⁡(x∣z0)=1{x=z0} when z0∈VL, while Dec⁡(x∣z0)=∣V∣−L otherwise. Define p(x,z0,…,zN)=1{zN=mL}(∏j=1NPj(zj,zj−1))Dec⁡(x∣z0),p(x)=∑z0,…,zNp(x,z0,…,zN). For each x∈VL, let πx(z)=p(x,z)/p(x) whenever p(x)>0 and define the finite ELBO E(x)=∑z:qx(z)>0qx(z)log⁡(p(x,z)/qx(z)). Here admissibility means qx is supported where p(x,⋅)>0 and the finite weighted logarithm sums required for the ELBO are finite. Let Pj,imask be the conditional law of (Zj,Xi) given Zj,i=m, and let Rj,i=E[−log⁡hi,j(Zj)(Xi)∣Zj,i=m], with −log⁡0=+∞. For probability vectors u,v on a finite set, write DKL(u∥v)=∑a:u(a)>0u(a)log⁡(u(a)/v(a)), with zero source terms set to zero and positive source mass against zero reference mass set to +∞. Then p(x)>0, qx is admissible, and for every x, log⁡p(x)=E(x)+DKL(qx∥πx),E(x)≤log⁡p(x). Moreover, averaging over X∼μ gives E[−E(X)]=∑j=1N∑i=1L(αj−1−αj)Rj,i. The reconstruction term and terminal-prior KL vanish here because the endpoints are exactly clean and all-masked; with approximate endpoints, the ordinary ELBO retains those terms and this corollary does not discard them.

Statement references

Finite masked-diffusion generative model: defines Pj, the terminal point mass, decoder D, and finite joint path mass.

Forward path law is admissible for the finite masked model: full support of h makes p(x)>0 and the forward path law admissible.

Masked-diffusion KL reduces to weighted cross-entropy: each averaged finite reverse-KL contribution equals the weighted conditional masked-token population risk.

Finite masking path law factors backward by its posterior rows: the positive forward path law factors in reverse order by its one-step posterior rows.

Evidence lower bound is log evidence minus reverse KL: under AC and admissibility, log evidence is ELBO plus the reverse KL and therefore bounds the ELBO above.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Choice, the exact finite masked chain and learned reverse model, the full-support hypothesis, the stated decoder/prior, and the finite ELBO definition. Prove admissibility, the ELBO identity and bound, and the averaged cross-entropy formula.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC is the axiom that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; it is used only through the library ELBO/KL theorem.

[F1]

Finite masked-diffusion generative model: the reverse kernels, terminal prior, decoder, and joint mass define the model.

[F2]

Finite masked-diffusion joint model is normalized: the finite joint model is a probability vector.

[F3]

Forward path law is admissible for the finite masked model: for each clean x, the forward path law is supported where p(x,z)>0 and satisfies the variational absolute-log-integrability condition.

[F4]

Variational family and evidence lower bound: admissible q has finite evidence and log integrability, and its ELBO is ∫q(log⁡γ−log⁡q).

[F5]

Evidence lower bound is log evidence minus reverse KL: under AC and admissibility, log⁡Z=ELBO⁡(q)+∫qlog⁡(q/π) dμ, the log-ratio integral is the library divergence D(Q∥Π), and D(Q∥Π)≥0.

[F6]

Finite masking path law factors backward by its posterior rows: on positive paths, qx(z0:N)=qx(zN)∏j=N1qx(zj−1∣zj,x).

[F7]

Masked-diffusion KL reduces to weighted cross-entropy: the data-averaged sum of conditional reverse KL terms is the stated weighted cross-entropy risk.

[F8]

Finite Kullback–Leibler divergence: for finite probability vectors, the directional KL is the finite expectation of the log likelihood ratio, with singular positive-mass terms equal to +∞.

Proof

1.1A1F2F3F4F5F8given

Fix x∈VL and take counting measure on the finite path space SN+1. By [F2], γx(z)=p(x,z) has finite normalizer Zx=p(x)≤1; by [F3], 0<Zx and qx is admissible for γx. Under this counting measure, the induced probability laws assign singleton masses qx(z) and πx(z). Admissibility gives qx(z)>0⇒πx(z)>0, so the ratio integral in [F5] is the finite sum ∑z:qx(z)>0qx(z)log⁡(qx(z)/πx(z)), which is exactly DKL(qx∥πx) by [F8]. Applying [F5] with [A1] therefore gives log⁡p(x)=E(x)+DKL(qx∥πx) and E(x)≤log⁡p(x).

1.2F1F3F6F8givenalgebra

The forward path formula forces Z0=x. For each coordinate, the product of forward survival ratios is αN=0, so the finite forward law assigns probability one to ZN=mL; thus on every qx-positive path the decoder and prior factors in [F1] are both one. By [F6], qx(z0:N)=qx(zN)∏j=N1qx(zj−1∣zj,x) on this path, and qx(zN)=1. Therefore log⁡(p(x,z)/qx(z)) is the sum of the reverse-step log ratios. By [F8], the conditional expectation of each log ratio is the negative finite KL term, so E(x)=−∑j=1NLj(x), where Lj(x)=EZj∣X=xDKL(q(Zj−1∣Zj,x)∥Pj(Zj,⋅)).

2.1F7step 1.2algebra

Average the identity from step 1.2 over X∼μ. The resulting expected sum of Lj(X) is exactly the left side of the finite KL-to-risk identity in [F7]; substituting [F7] yields E[−E(X)]=∑j,i(αj−1−αj)Rj,i.

3.1F1F3step 1.2algebra∎

The endpoint cancellation in step 1.2 uses Z0=x from α0=1 and ZN=mL from αN=0. If either endpoint is changed, its decoder reconstruction or terminal-prior KL factor remains in the finite log-ratio expansion unless a separate hypothesis makes it vanish.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources