How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Negative expected finite masked-diffusion ELBO is weighted cross-entropy
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be finite and nonempty, , , , and let for a probability vector on . Put . Conditional on , let be the finite forward masking path law started at : at step , each clean coordinate survives with probability and otherwise becomes the absorbing mask , independently across coordinates. For every position , reverse step , state with , and token , assume , where each is a probability vector on . Put and . Define the reverse kernel by copying every unmasked coordinate and, independently across masked positions conditional on , assigning mass to and mass to each . Use the point mass at as terminal prior and the decoder when , while otherwise. Define For each , let whenever and define the finite ELBO . Here admissibility means is supported where and the finite weighted logarithm sums required for the ELBO are finite. Let be the conditional law of given , and let , with . For probability vectors on a finite set, write , with zero source terms set to zero and positive source mass against zero reference mass set to . Then , is admissible, and for every , Moreover, averaging over gives The reconstruction term and terminal-prior KL vanish here because the endpoints are exactly clean and all-masked; with approximate endpoints, the ordinary ELBO retains those terms and this corollary does not discard them.
Statement references
Finite masked-diffusion generative model: defines , the terminal point mass, decoder , and finite joint path mass.
Forward path law is admissible for the finite masked model: full support of makes and the forward path law admissible.
Masked-diffusion KL reduces to weighted cross-entropy: each averaged finite reverse-KL contribution equals the weighted conditional masked-token population risk.
Finite masking path law factors backward by its posterior rows: the positive forward path law factors in reverse order by its one-step posterior rows.
Evidence lower bound is log evidence minus reverse KL: under AC and admissibility, log evidence is ELBO plus the reverse KL and therefore bounds the ELBO above.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Choice, the exact finite masked chain and learned reverse model, the full-support hypothesis, the stated decoder/prior, and the finite ELBO definition. Prove admissibility, the ELBO identity and bound, and the averaged cross-entropy formula.
The Axiom of Choice: AC is the axiom that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; it is used only through the library ELBO/KL theorem.
Finite masked-diffusion generative model: the reverse kernels, terminal prior, decoder, and joint mass define the model.
Finite masked-diffusion joint model is normalized: the finite joint model is a probability vector.
Forward path law is admissible for the finite masked model: for each clean , the forward path law is supported where and satisfies the variational absolute-log-integrability condition.
Variational family and evidence lower bound: admissible has finite evidence and log integrability, and its ELBO is .
Evidence lower bound is log evidence minus reverse KL: under AC and admissibility, , the log-ratio integral is the library divergence , and .
Finite masking path law factors backward by its posterior rows: on positive paths, .
Masked-diffusion KL reduces to weighted cross-entropy: the data-averaged sum of conditional reverse KL terms is the stated weighted cross-entropy risk.
Finite Kullback–Leibler divergence: for finite probability vectors, the directional KL is the finite expectation of the log likelihood ratio, with singular positive-mass terms equal to .
Proof
Fix and take counting measure on the finite path space . By [F2], has finite normalizer ; by [F3], and is admissible for . Under this counting measure, the induced probability laws assign singleton masses and . Admissibility gives , so the ratio integral in [F5] is the finite sum , which is exactly by [F8]. Applying [F5] with [A1] therefore gives and .
The forward path formula forces . For each coordinate, the product of forward survival ratios is , so the finite forward law assigns probability one to ; thus on every -positive path the decoder and prior factors in [F1] are both one. By [F6], on this path, and . Therefore is the sum of the reverse-step log ratios. By [F8], the conditional expectation of each log ratio is the negative finite KL term, so , where .
Average the identity from step 1.2 over . The resulting expected sum of is exactly the left side of the finite KL-to-risk identity in [F7]; substituting [F7] yields .
The endpoint cancellation in step 1.2 uses from and from . If either endpoint is changed, its decoder reconstruction or terminal-prior KL factor remains in the finite log-ratio expansion unless a separate hypothesis makes it vanish.
Depends on
- Finite-grid masked reverse sampler
- The Axiom of Choice
- Finite masked-diffusion generative model
- Finite Kullback–Leibler divergence
- Finite masking diffusion chain
- Variational family and evidence lower bound
- Finite-grid masked sampler defines a normalized law
- Finite masked-diffusion joint model is normalized
- Forward path law is admissible for the finite masked model
- Finite masking-chain transitions define a probability law
- Finite masking path law factors backward by its posterior rows
- Evidence lower bound is log evidence minus reverse KL
- Masked-diffusion KL reduces to weighted cross-entropy
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Subham Sekhar Sahoo et al., Simple and Effective Masked Diffusion Language Models, arXiv v1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- David M. Blei, Alp Kucukelbir, and Jon D. McAuliffe, Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticians (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ronghuo Zheng, Zhiting Hu, and Yuntian Deng, CMU 10-708 Lecture 13: Variational Inference II (standard reference, not scraped)