How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Stone–Čech compactifications are uniquely homeomorphic over the original space
Statement
Under the hypotheses of Under the ultrafilter lemma and dependent choice, the closure of the full evaluation image is the Stone–Čech compactification, two Stone–Čech compactifications and of are uniquely homeomorphic by a map satisfying .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Stone–Čech compactifications and of under the stated choice hypotheses.
The Stone–Čech property gives a unique continuous extension into every compact Hausdorff target (The Stone–Čech compactification by its compact-Hausdorff extension property).
Continuous maps to a Hausdorff target agreeing on a dense subset are equal (Two continuous maps into a Hausdorff space that agree on a dense subset are equal).
Proof
Apply [L1] twice to obtain continuous and with and .
The maps and agree on , which is dense in , so [L2] gives . Similarly .
Hence is a homeomorphism over ; its uniqueness is the uniqueness clause in [L1].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 44 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Project, Stone–Čech compactification (standard reference, not scraped)