How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Under the ultrafilter lemma and dependent choice, the closure of the full evaluation image is the Stone–Čech compactification
Statement
Assume the ultrafilter lemma and dependent choice. If is Tychonoff, is its full evaluation map, and , then is a Stone–Čech compactification of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two stated choice principles, a Tychonoff space , its full evaluation closure , a compact Hausdorff space , and a continuous map .
Under the ultrafilter lemma, the evaluation closure gives a Hausdorff compactification (Assuming the ultrafilter lemma, every Tychonoff space has a Hausdorff compactification).
Under dependent choice, has an embedding (Under dependent choice, every compact Hausdorff space embeds in a unit cube).
A compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed, and continuous maps agreeing on a dense subset with Hausdorff target agree everywhere (In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones, Two continuous maps into a Hausdorff space that agree on a dense subset are equal).
A family of continuous component maps assembles uniquely to a continuous map into the product (A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice).
Every continuous unit-interval-valued map extends uniquely over the full evaluation closure (Every continuous -valued function extends uniquely over the closure of the full evaluation image).
A Stone–Čech compactification is a Hausdorff compactification with the stated unique compact-Hausdorff extension property (The Stone–Čech compactification by its compact-Hausdorff extension property).
Proof
By [L1], is compact Hausdorff and is dense in it.
Use [L2] to fix an embedding . For each , the map extends uniquely to a continuous by [L5].
The family assembles to a continuous map by [L4], and coordinatewise.
The subset is compact, hence closed in the Hausdorff cube by [L3]. It contains , so it contains : the inverse image is closed in and contains the dense subset .
Thus is continuous and satisfies . If is another extension, then and agree on dense , so [L3] gives equality and injectivity of gives .
Step 1.1 gives a Hausdorff compactification and step 4.1 gives the required unique extension for every compact Hausdorff target. This is exactly [L6].
Depends on
- Assuming the ultrafilter lemma, every Tychonoff space has a Hausdorff compactification
- The Stone–Čech compactification by its compact-Hausdorff extension property
- Every continuous $[0,1]$-valued function extends uniquely over the closure of the full evaluation image
- Under dependent choice, every compact Hausdorff space embeds in a unit cube
- A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice
- In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones
- Two continuous maps into a Hausdorff space that agree on a dense subset are equal
Used by
- Stone–Čech compactifications are uniquely homeomorphic over the original space Corollary
- Under dependent choice and the ultrafilter lemma, the Stone-Cech compactification maps continuously onto the Samuel compactification Corollary
- Under dependent choice and the ultrafilter lemma, the Samuel compactification of the discrete natural numbers is beta N Example
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 95 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Project, Stone–Čech compactification (standard reference, not scraped)