How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Additive cocontinuous module functors and their schematic category
Definition
Let and be unital rings, and let and be their categories of unital left modules (Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module). A functor is additive when its induced maps on hom-groups are group homomorphisms (Additive functor), and cocontinuous when it preserves every small (set-indexed) colimit (Preservation, reflection, and creation of limits and colimits; continuous and cocontinuous functors). The functor is additive cocontinuous when it is both additive and cocontinuous.
Cocontinuity has a module-theoretic reformulation: an additive functor preserves all small colimits if and only if it is right exact (Left exact and right exact functors) and preserves arbitrary direct sums. The characterization is proved in An additive module functor is cocontinuous exactly when it is right exact and preserves coproducts ↗.
We write for the schematic category of these functors and natural transformations, with componentwise identities and vertical composition. As prescribed by Functor category and Class-sized category theory in ZFC: definable-class schemas, small and locally small categories, and why is not formed, this is metatheoretic shorthand: functors on the large module category are fixed definable-class schemas, not set-coded objects of a ZFC class category. All categorical assertions here and in the Eilenberg–Watts equivalence are understood componentwise for fixed such schemas. For each fixed pair , Natural transformations of additive cocontinuous module functors are determined at the regular module ↗ proves that a natural transformation is determined by its component at and that the admissible components form a set. We use that set as ; the corresponding proper-class families themselves are not elements of a set. No category of all definable-class functors is formed.
The term is a property of a functor; no commutativity of or is assumed, and no choice is used.
Depends on
- Additive functor
- Preservation, reflection, and creation of limits and colimits; continuous and cocontinuous functors
- Functor category $[\mathcal C,\mathcal D]$
- Left exact and right exact functors
- Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module
- Class-sized category theory in ZFC: definable-class schemas, small and locally small categories, and why $\mathbf{CAT}$ is not formed
Used by
- Eilenberg-Watts is a schematic equivalence of Hom categories Corollary
- An additive module functor is cocontinuous exactly when it is right exact and preserves coproducts Lemma
- Natural transformations of additive cocontinuous module functors are determined at the regular module Lemma
- Tensoring defines a schematic pseudofunctor with interchange Lemma
- Eilenberg-Watts schematic biequivalence between the Morita bicategory and module categories Theorem
- Eilenberg-Watts theorem for arbitrary unital rings Theorem
- Morita equivalence is invertibility of a bimodule Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. Kamensky, Non-Commutative Algebra (BGU course notes, Spring 2017), §5.1, Theorem 5.1.43, Proposition 5.1.40, Lemma 5.1.46, Corollaries 5.1.48-5.1.49 (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Nyman and S. P. Smith, A Generalization of Watts's Theorem: Right Exact Functors on Module Categories, arXiv:0806.0832, Theorem 1.1-1.2, Propositions 3.2-3.3, Lemma 3.4 (standard reference, not scraped)