How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Natural transformations of additive cocontinuous module functors are determined at the regular module
Statement
Let be unital rings. The additive cocontinuous functors (Additive cocontinuous module functors and their schematic category), satisfy the category laws schematically, with componentwise identities and vertical composition. For each fixed pair , every natural transformation is determined by its component at . The admissible components constitute a subset of , giving a set of codes . This is local smallness in the schematic sense of Additive cocontinuous module functors and their schematic category; it does not make proper-class functors or component families into sets. No choice is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Unital rings and , additive cocontinuous functors , and a natural transformation .
A functor is additive cocontinuous when it is additive and preserves every small colimit; the categorical notation is schematic under the definable-class convention (Additive cocontinuous module functors and their schematic category).
Additivity means that the induced maps on hom-groups are group homomorphisms; in particular the identity functor and composites of additive functors are additive (Additive functor).
A natural transformation satisfies the naturality equation for every (Natural transformation and its components).
Identity transformations are natural, and the vertical composite of natural transformations is natural (componentwise) and is associative and unital componentwise (Identity natural transformation and vertical composition, Vertical composites of natural transformations satisfy naturality).
The free module on the underlying set of a left -module carries the canonical surjection with (Every module is a quotient of a free module).
A right exact functor between abelian categories preserves epimorphisms (A left exact functor preserves monomorphisms and a right exact functor preserves epimorphisms).
and are abelian categories (Modules over a ring form an abelian category).
A functor is right exact when it preserves every finite colimit; a cocontinuous functor preserves all small colimits and therefore every finite colimit (Left exact and right exact functors).
The direct sum is the coproduct of the family with its coordinate inclusions , and a homomorphism out of it is uniquely determined by its composites with the (The direct sum of an indexed family of modules, Universal property of a direct sum of modules).
Proof
The identity functor is additive, its induced maps on hom-groups being identity homomorphisms, and it preserves every colimit; hence it is additive cocontinuous.
If and are additive cocontinuous, then is additive, a composite of hom-group homomorphisms being one, and cocontinuous, since for a small diagram with colimit the object is a colimit of and is a colimit of .
Identity transformations and vertical composites are natural by [F4]. Associativity and the identity laws hold at each component. Thus the categorical operations satisfy their laws for fixed functor and transformation schemas; this does not form a category whose objects are proper classes.
Free modules: let be a set and let be the coordinate inclusions of the free module , a coproduct of copies of . Since and preserve this coproduct, with the maps , where , is a coproduct of copies of , and by [F9] a map out of is determined by its composites with the maps ; the same holds for with . Naturality [F3] gives for every , so is determined by : if then .
Epic free covers: the canonical surjection is an epimorphism, since two maps out of agreeing after composition with agree everywhere by surjectivity of . Each of is right exact by [F8], and , are abelian by [F7], so and are epimorphisms by [F6].
Suppose for two natural transformations . Step 1.4 and naturality at every coordinate inclusion give . Naturality at then gives ; epicness of from step 1.5 yields . Hence the transformations agree at every module.
To obtain set codes, fix the defining formulas and parameters for . For and a module , let be the unique map whose composite with is for every ; it exists by coproduct preservation and [F9]. Call admissible when, for every , there is a map with , these maps satisfy for every , and . The descents are unique by step 1.5, so this is a predicate quantifying only over sets and set-coded module maps, not over class families. Separation gives the set of admissible . Every natural transformation gives such a code by naturality at , and each admissible code defines its component family uniquely. Together with steps 1.3 and 2.1 this proves the claimed schematic category laws and local smallness, without applying replacement to proper-class-valued outputs. No choice is used.
Depends on
- Additive cocontinuous module functors and their schematic category
- Additive functor
- Natural transformation and its components
- Identity natural transformation and vertical composition
- Vertical composites of natural transformations satisfy naturality
- Every module is a quotient of a free module
- A left exact functor preserves monomorphisms and a right exact functor preserves epimorphisms
- Left exact and right exact functors
- Modules over a ring form an abelian category
- The direct sum of an indexed family of modules
- Universal property of a direct sum of modules
Used by
- Eilenberg-Watts is a schematic equivalence of Hom categories Corollary
- Tensoring defines a schematic pseudofunctor with interchange Lemma
- Eilenberg-Watts schematic biequivalence between the Morita bicategory and module categories Theorem
- Eilenberg-Watts theorem for arbitrary unital rings Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Additive cocontinuous module functors and their schematic category.
Dependency tree · two levels
28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. Kamensky, Non-Commutative Algebra (BGU course notes, Spring 2017), §5.1, Theorem 5.1.43, Proposition 5.1.40, Lemma 5.1.46, Corollaries 5.1.48-5.1.49 (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Nyman and S. P. Smith, A Generalization of Watts's Theorem: Right Exact Functors on Module Categories, arXiv:0806.0832, Theorem 1.1-1.2, Propositions 3.2-3.3, Lemma 3.4 (standard reference, not scraped)