Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The central reduction of the enveloping algebra at a central character

Definition

Let g be a complex Lie algebra, let Z(U(g)) be the center of its enveloping algebra (The universal enveloping algebra as a tensor quotient), and let χ ⁣:Z(U(g))→C be a unital C-algebra homomorphism, that is, a central character (Central character of a Lie algebra module). Write ker⁡χ={z∈Z(U(g)):χ(z)=0} and let

U(g)ker⁡χ={∑k=1mukzk:m≥0, uk∈U(g), zk∈ker⁡χ}

be the two-sided ideal of U(g) generated by ker⁡χ (The sum I+J and product IJ of two-sided ideals, The sum and product of two-sided ideals are two-sided ideals). The central reduction of U(g) at χ is the quotient algebra

Uχ:=U(g) / U(g)ker⁡χ.

It is a unital associative C-algebra, the natural map U(g)→Uχ is a surjective algebra homomorphism with kernel U(g)ker⁡χ, the image of Z(U(g)) in Uχ is C⋅1, and for a U(g)-module M the following are equivalent:

  • (i) M has central character χ, i.e. every z∈Z(U(g)) acts on M by the scalar χ(z);
  • (ii) ker⁡χ annihilates M;
  • (iii) the action of U(g) on M factors uniquely through Uχ.

Thus the U(g)-modules with central character χ are exactly the Uχ-modules.

Remarks

  • The generating set is central, so the ideal is two-sided. Every z∈ker⁡χ commutes with U(g), hence ukzk=zkuk and the set displayed above is already closed under left and right multiplication; it is an additive subgroup because finite sums of such terms are such terms, and it contains 0 as the empty sum. This is the ideal generated by ker⁡χ (Left, right and two-sided ideals).
  • Every central element is scalar modulo the ideal. For z∈Z(U(g)) one has z−χ(z)⋅1∈ker⁡χ⊆U(g)ker⁡χ, so z and the scalar χ(z) have the same image in Uχ. Thus the image of the center consists of scalar classes; this does not imply that every element of Uχ is scalar.
  • The equivalences. Condition (i) says z acts by χ(z) for every central z, which is equivalent to (z−χ(z))m=0 for all such z and all m, hence to ker⁡χ annihilating M because ker⁡χ consists exactly of the elements z with χ(z)=0. If ρ ⁣:U(g)→End⁡C(M) denotes the action, then (ii) says ker⁡χ⊆ker⁡ρ, so U(g)ker⁡χ⊆ker⁡ρ because ker⁡ρ is a two-sided ideal; the quotient universal property (A ring homomorphism whose kernel contains a two-sided ideal factors uniquely through the quotient ring) then produces a unique factorization of ρ through Uχ, which is (iii). Conversely a factorization through Uχ kills U(g)ker⁡χ and hence ker⁡χ, which is (ii).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources