Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Verma annihilator contains the central-character ideal

Statement

Let λ∈h∗, let χλ ⁣:Z(U(g))→C be the central character determined by λ through the Harish-Chandra projection, so that every z∈Z(U(g)) acts on the Verma module M(λ) by the scalar χλ(z)=pr⁡(z)(λ). Then

U(g)ker⁡χλ⊆Ann⁡U(g)M(λ)⊆Ann⁡U(g)L(λ)=I(λ),

and every element of the two-sided ideal generated by ker⁡χλ annihilates every cyclic highest-weight module of highest weight λ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A weight λ∈h∗, the Verma module M(λ) with its unique simple quotient L(λ), and the central character χλ with χλ(z)=pr⁡(z)(λ).

[F1]

Every cyclic highest-weight module M=U(g)v of highest weight λ has a central character, and every z∈Z(U(g)) acts on M by the scalar pr⁡(z)(λ) (Central elements act by scalars on cyclic highest-weight modules, The Harish-Chandra projection computes the highest-weight scalar, Central character of a Lie algebra module, Highest-weight vectors and cyclic highest-weight modules).

[F2]

The Verma module M(λ) has a unique simple quotient L(λ)=M(λ)/J(λ), and L(λ) is simple (A Verma module has a unique simple quotient, Verma modules).

[F3]

The annihilator of a module is a two-sided ideal, and annihilators grow when passing to quotients: if M→Q is a surjection of U(g)-modules and uM=0, then uQ=0 (The annihilator of a module over an enveloping algebra).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

By [F1], z∈Z(U(g)) acts on M(λ) by the scalar pr⁡(z)(λ)=χλ(z). Hence z∈ker⁡χλ acts on M(λ) by 0, that is, ker⁡χλ⊆Ann⁡U(g)M(λ).

1.2F1algebra

More generally, let M=U(g)v be any cyclic highest-weight module of highest weight λ and let u∈U(g), z∈ker⁡χλ. For a∈U(g) one has (uz)(av)=u(zav)=u(azv)=uaχλ(z)v=0 by [F1] and centrality of z; since every element of M has the form av, the element uz annihilates M. As products uz span U(g)ker⁡χλ, every element of that ideal annihilates every cyclic highest-weight module of highest weight λ.

2.1step 1.1F3algebra

Since Ann⁡U(g)M(λ) is a two-sided ideal by [F3], it contains all products uz with u∈U(g) and z∈ker⁡χλ, hence contains the two-sided ideal U(g)ker⁡χλ generated by ker⁡χλ. Thus U(g)ker⁡χλ⊆Ann⁡U(g)M(λ).

3.1step 2.1step 1.2F2F3∎

The Verma module M(λ) has its unique simple quotient L(λ) by [F2], and an operator annihilating M(λ) annihilates each quotient by [F3], so Ann⁡U(g)M(λ)⊆Ann⁡U(g)L(λ)=I(λ). Together with step 2.1 this gives the displayed chain, and step 1.2 gives the final assertion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources