Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Abstract isometric polyhedral gluings and the chain metric

Definition

Shape and face posets. Let (P,≤) be a poset (Partial order and partially ordered set) with least element ∅ such that:

(a) for every p∈P the principal down-set P≤p:={r∈P:r≤p} is finite and, when p≠∅, is isomorphic as a poset to the face poset of a nonempty compact convex polyhedral cell (Finite convex cell complex and linear subdivision, Face poset and order complex);

(b) every two elements p,q∈P have a greatest lower bound p∧q in P, that is, an element of P that is a lower bound of both and is larger than every such lower bound.

The elements of P are called faces, p≤q is read "p is a face of q", and ∅ is the empty face.

Isometric polyhedral gluing. An isometric polyhedral gluing of shape P consists of the following data.

(i) Cells and face isometries. For every p∈P∖{∅} a nonempty compact convex polyhedral cell Cp in a finite-dimensional Euclidean affine space, and for every pair p≤q of nonempty faces a nonempty face Fp,q of Cq together with an affine isometry hp,q from the affine span of Cp onto the affine span of Fp,q (Isometry, isometric embedding, and the subspace metric on a subset) which carries Cp onto Fp,q, subject to:

  • hp,p=id⁡Cp for every p;
  • the cocycle condition hq,r∘hp,q=hp,r whenever p≤q≤r;
  • for every q the assignment p↦Fp,q=hp,q(Cp) is an isomorphism of posets from P≤q∖{∅} onto the set of nonempty faces of Cq, ordered by inclusion.

(ii) Quotient and intersection condition. Let X be the quotient of the disjoint union ⨆p∈P∖{∅}Cp by the equivalence relation generated by x∼hp,q(x) for x∈Cp and p≤q, and let ιp ⁣:Cp→X denote the quotient map. The intersection condition is:

  • each ιp is injective; and
  • for all nonempty faces p,q one has ιp(Cp)∩ιq(Cq)=ιp∧q(Cp∧q), where the right-hand side denotes the empty subset of X when p∧q=∅.

(iii) Weak topology. A subset U⊆X is declared open if and only if U∩ιp(Cp) is relatively open in ιp(Cp) for every nonempty face p (The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement).

Standing hypotheses. (H1) Connectedness: X≠∅ and X is connected. (H2) Local finiteness: every point of X lies in ιp(Cp) for only finitely many p. (H3) Finite shapes: the cells Cp fall into only finitely many isometry classes. By (H1) at least one cell exists, so by (H3) the maximum D:=max⁡{dim⁡Cp:p∈P∖{∅}} of the dimensions of the cells is a well-defined natural number.

Chains and the chain metric candidate. Write dp for the Euclidean metric on the affine span of Cp. Let x,y∈X. A chain from x to y is a finite sequence x=x0,x1,…,xm=y of points of X such that for each i∈{1,…,m} some cell contains both xi−1 and xi; for m=0 the chain is the one-term sequence x. Its length is ℓ(x0,…,xm):=∑i=1mdpi(xi−1,xi), where for each i the face pi is any nonempty face with xi−1,xi∈ιpi(Cpi); this number does not depend on these choices. The chain metric candidate of the gluing is d(x,y):=inf⁡{ ℓ(x0,…,xm):x0,…,xm is a chain from x to y }. Because X is connected, every two points of X are joined by a chain (this and the independence of ℓ from the chosen faces are proved in The chain metric is a metric, its topology is the weak topology, and the space is proper and complete ↗), so the infimum is taken over a nonempty set of real numbers, and 0≤d(x,y)<∞. This finiteness follows from (H1) and the gluing data; it is not an additional hypothesis.

What is asserted, and what is not. For all x,y,z∈X one has d(x,x)=0 (the one-term chain), d(x,y)=d(y,x) (reverse a chain) and d(x,z)≤d(x,y)+d(y,z) (concatenate chains), and these three facts need no hypothesis beyond the definitions. No other metric axiom, no agreement of d with the weak topology, and no completeness, properness or geodesic property is asserted here: those are the conclusions of the theorems of this page, under (H1)–(H3).

Caveat on cell metrics. If x,y lie in a common cell then the one-step chain gives d(x,y)≤dp(x,y), but equality can fail, because a chain may leave the cell and return with smaller total length (Bridson–Haefliger I.7.6). Nothing above asserts that the chain metric restricts to the Euclidean metric of a cell, and no cell is assumed to be geodesic for d.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources