Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingaudited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Under the Axiom of Choice, proper polyhedral spaces admit minimizing geodesics

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be an isometric polyhedral gluing with standing hypotheses (H1)-(H3) of Abstract isometric polyhedral gluings and the chain metric, so that (X,d) is a proper metric space by The chain metric is a metric, its topology is the weak topology, and the space is proper and complete. Then every pair x,y∈X is joined by a minimizing geodesic: there is a path γ ⁣:[0,d(x,y)]→X with γ(0)=x, γ(d(x,y))=y and d(γ(s),γ(t))=∣s−t∣ for all s,t (Geodesics and geodesic metric spaces); in particular (X,d) is a geodesic metric space. More precisely, every sequence of chains from x to y whose lengths tend to d(x,y) has a subsequence whose associated polygonal paths, each traversed at constant speed on the common domain [0,1], converge uniformly to a continuous path of length d(x,y) whose arc-length reparametrization is a minimizing geodesic from x to y. The case x=y is included: then d(x,y)=0 and the degenerate interval [0,0]={0} carries the geodesic γ(0)=x.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An isometric polyhedral gluing X with (H1)-(H3), its chain metric candidate d, and points x,y∈X with R:=d(x,y); the Axiom of Choice is assumed.

[F1]

Chains and the chain metric: a chain from x to y is a finite sequence x=x0,…,xm=y such that each consecutive pair lies in a common cell; its length is the sum of the Euclidean distances of its steps computed in any common cells; d is the infimum of the lengths of chains from x to y, and these lengths form a nonempty set of reals. (Abstract isometric polyhedral gluings and the chain metric)

[F3]

In a metric space: d(γ(u),γ(v))≤L(γ∣[u,v]) (chord bound) and L(γ∣[a,w])=L(γ∣[a,v])+L(γ∣[v,w]) for paths, where L is the supremum of polygonal sums; L is lower semicontinuous under uniform convergence; and a continuous rectifiable path γ ⁣:[a,b]→X has a continuous nondecreasing surjective arclength function s ⁣:[a,b]→[0,L] with s(a)=0, s(b)=L, through which it factors uniquely as γ=γˉ∘s with γˉ 1-Lipschitz and L(γˉ∣[r,q])=q−r. (Length in a metric target: lower semicontinuity and arc-length reparametrization, Metric space: d(x,y)=0 iff x=y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric)

[F4]

Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice): every family of nonempty sets has a choice function.

[F5]

Ascoli-Arzela for proper targets, under the Axiom of Choice: for a nonempty compact metric domain Z, a proper metric target Y and an equicontinuous sequence (fk) in C(Z,Y) that is pointwise bounded, some subsequence converges uniformly to a member of C(Z,Y). (Under the Axiom of Choice, a pointwise bounded equicontinuous sequence on a nonempty compact metric domain into a proper metric target has a uniformly convergent subsequence)

[F6]

Geodesic segments: a map γ ⁣:[0,ℓ]→X with γ(0)=x, γ(ℓ)=y and d(γ(s),γ(t))=∣s−t∣ for all s,t is a geodesic segment from x to y, and necessarily ℓ=d(x,y); (X,d) is geodesic when every two points are joined by one. (Geodesics and geodesic metric spaces)

[F7]

The infimum R=inf⁡S of a nonempty set S of reals is the greatest lower bound of S, so for every real ε>0 there is t∈S with t<R+ε. (Greatest lower bound (infimum))

[F10]

For a sequence (ak) in [0,∞], the limit inferior is the supremum of the tail infima: lim inf⁡kak=sup⁡Ninf⁡k≥Nak, so inf⁡k≥Nak≤lim inf⁡kak for every N; and for every real ε>0 there is a natural N≥1 with 1/N<ε. (Limit superior and limit inferior of a nonnegative extended-real sequence, For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε)

Proof

Given: The gluing X with (H1)-(H3), the metric d and its properties [F2], points x,y∈X and R=d(x,y).

1.1F1F3

(Realizing a chain by a path.) Every chain x=x0,…,xm=y of length ℓ is the vertex sequence of a path γ ⁣:[0,1]→X traversing straight segments of the cells at constant speed, with γ(0)=x, γ(1)=y, d(γ(s),γ(t))≤(t−s)ℓ for all s≤t, and L(γ)≤ℓ. Deleting one of each two consecutive equal points leaves a chain of the same length, so assume xi−1≠xi and put Li:=dpi(xi−1,xi)>0 and ℓ=L1+⋯+Lm>0; if ℓ=0 the reduced chain is the single point x=y and we take the constant path, for which all claims are immediate. For t∈[0,1] define γ(t) to be the point at fraction (t−Ti−1)/(Ti−Ti−1) of the straight segment from xi−1 to xi inside Cpi, where Ti:=(L1+⋯+Li)/ℓ; this is well defined because the segment lies in the convex cell Cpi [F1]. Given s≤t, the points γ(s), the vertices xi strictly between the parameters s and t, and γ(t) form a chain whose steps lie in the traversed cells and whose length is the total traversed Euclidean distance (t−s)ℓ, because the path moves at constant speed inside each cell; hence d(γ(s),γ(t))≤(t−s)ℓ by [F1]. Every polygonal sum of γ over a partition is therefore at most ℓ, so the supremum over partitions gives L(γ)≤ℓ [F3].

2.1F1F4F7step 1.1

(Near-minimizing paths.) By [F7], for each n≥1 there is a chain from x to y of length ℓn<R+1/n; apply [F4] to the countable family of nonempty sets of such chains, recording in each chain a common cell for each step (only finitely many choices per chain). This selects a sequence of chains and their realizing paths from step 1.1. Each selected chain yields a path γn ⁣:[0,1]→X with γn(0)=x, γn(1)=y, L(γn)≤ℓn<R+1/n and d(γn(s),γn(t))≤ℓn ∣t−s∣≤(R+1)∣t−s∣, the last inequality because 1/n≤1 and R≥0.

3.1F8step 2.1

(Equicontinuity and pointwise boundedness.) By step 2.1 each γn is (R+1)-Lipschitz, hence continuous, and the family (γn) is equicontinuous: for a real ε>0 the number δ:=ε/(R+1)>0 satisfies d(γn(s),γn(t))≤(R+1)∣s−t∣<ε for all n and all s,t with ∣s−t∣<δ. It is pointwise bounded: for every t∈[0,1], d(γn(t),x)=d(γn(t),γn(0))≤(R+1)t≤R+1, so {γn(t):n≥1}⊆Bˉ(x,R+1)⊆B(x,R+2) is bounded.

4.1F2F4F5F9step 3.1

(The Ascoli subsequence.) The interval [0,1] is a nonempty compact metric space [F9], the target X is a proper metric space [F2], and (γn) is an equicontinuous, pointwise bounded sequence of continuous maps by step 3.1, so the Ascoli-Arzela theorem [F5] — with its Choice hypothesis [F4] — gives a subsequence (γnk) converging uniformly to a continuous γ ⁣:[0,1]→X. Uniform convergence implies γ(0)=x and γ(1)=y, since γnk(0)=x and γnk(1)=y for every k.

5.1F3F10step 2.1step 4.1

(The limit has length R.) By lower semicontinuity [F3], L(γ)≤lim inf⁡kL(γnk). For every real ε>0, the strictly increasing positive indices nk tend to infinity (inductively nk≥k+1), so L(γnk)≤R+1/nk<R+ε for all sufficiently large k [step 2.1, F10]. Every tail, including those starting earlier, contains such a term; its infimum is therefore at most R+ε. Taking the supremum of all tail infima gives lim inf⁡kL(γnk)≤R+ε by [F10]. As this holds for every ε>0, that limit inferior is at most R, and hence L(γ)≤R. Conversely the two-point partition gives d(γ(0),γ(1))≤L(γ) [F3], that is R≤L(γ) by step 4.1. Therefore L(γ)=R<∞.

6.1F2F3F6step 4.1step 5.1

(The minimizing geodesic.) Since γ is continuous and rectifiable with L(γ)=R, clause (ii) of [F3] provides a continuous nondecreasing surjection s ⁣:[0,1]→[0,R] with s(0)=0, s(1)=R, a unique γˉ ⁣:[0,R]→X with γ=γˉ∘s, and L(γˉ∣[r,q])=q−r for all 0≤r≤q≤R; in particular γˉ(0)=γ(0)=x and γˉ(R)=γ(1)=y. Let 0≤r≤q≤R. The chord bound gives d(γˉ(r),γˉ(q))≤L(γˉ∣[r,q])=q−r, and the triangle inequality for d [F2] together with the chord bound on [0,r] and [q,R] gives R=d(x,y)≤d(x,γˉ(r))+d(γˉ(r),γˉ(q))+d(γˉ(q),y)≤r+d(γˉ(r),γˉ(q))+(R−q), so d(γˉ(r),γˉ(q))≥q−r. Hence d(γˉ(r),γˉ(q))=q−r for all r≤q, and γˉ is a geodesic segment from x to y in the sense of [F6]; as x,y were arbitrary, (X,d) is geodesic.

7.1F4F5F8F10step 1.1step 3.1step 5.1step 6.1∎

(The subsequence clause.) Let now (C(n)) be any sequence of chains from x to y with lengths ℓn→R, and choose realizing paths γn from step 1.1 using [F4] if common cells are not already specified; then L(γn)≤ℓn and d(γn(s),γn(t))≤ℓn∣t−s∣, and ℓn≤R+1 for all sufficiently large n, so each γn is M-Lipschitz with the common constant M:=1+sup⁡nℓn<∞ and the family is equicontinuous and pointwise bounded (all values lie in the bounded set Bˉ(x,M), since d(γn(t),x)≤ℓnt≤M). Ascoli's theorem [F5] gives a uniformly convergent subsequence, and its limit has the same endpoints. The proof of step 5.1 applies because L(γnk)≤ℓnk→R: every tail infimum is at most R+ε for every ε>0, so lower semicontinuity and the chord bound give limit length exactly R and whose arc-length reparametrization is, by step 6.1, a minimizing geodesic from x to y.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

90 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources