How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite large spherical complexes, their almost-negative matrices, the metric flag condition, and links
Definition
Fix the following notions; no theorem about them is asserted here beyond well-definedness.
(1) Finite spherical complexes. Let be a finite abstract simplicial complex (An abstract simplicial complex) whose simplices carry positive-definite Gram matrices of diagonal on their vertices, compatible on common faces, and let be the associated finite spherical complex with its chain metric and its truncated angular metric (Gram realisations, radial normalisation, finite spherical complexes and link Gram formulas(iii), Spherical Gram simplices and angular links of Euclidean faces, The angular path metric, the Euclidean cone and spherical joins(2)). is large when for every simplex and all distinct the edge length is at least , equivalently every off-diagonal entry of every is at most . Here “large” names this edge-length condition; it does not assert the distinct unique-geodesic-below- property called “large” for piecewise-spherical spaces in Charney–Davis §2.1.1.
(2) The associated almost-negative matrix. Let be large. Since is simplicial, a pair of vertices spans at most one edge. For an edge , let be the corresponding entry of its prescribed Gram matrix, and let be its one-cell spherical length. Define the symmetric matrix on the vertex set by , by the prescribed edge entry when is an edge of , and by when is not an edge. Its off-diagonal entries are non-positive: this is the almost-negative matrix associated with . The edge entry is taken from the prescribed local Gram data because a gluing's global chain metric need not restrict to a cell metric in general (Abstract isometric polyhedral gluings and the chain metric).
(3) The metric flag condition. Let be large. A set of vertices of is pairwise adjacent when every two distinct members of span an edge; in that case is the cosine matrix of . We regard the empty matrix as positive definite, so the empty set passes this test. Say that is metric flag when for every pairwise adjacent : is the vertex set of a simplex of if and only if is positive definite (Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia , rank , and signature of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form). The forward implication is automatic for complexes of spherical simplices, since a principal submatrix of a positive-definite Gram matrix is positive definite; the content of the condition is the converse. A large metric flag complex is a large finite spherical complex satisfying (3).
(4) Links. For a face of (that is, a simplex of ) the link is the finite spherical complex whose simplices are the links of the simplices (Subcomplexes, closures, stars, and links in a simplicial complex), carrying the Gram matrices obtained by the iterated Schur complement of Gram realisations, radial normalisation, finite spherical complexes and link Gram formulas(iv): its vertices are the vertices for which is a simplex of , and its cells are the sets disjoint from with a simplex of . Adjacency to every vertex of alone does not suffice: the resulting clique may have a non-positive-definite cosine matrix. No assertion is made here about complexes with edges shorter than ; the metric flag test is used only in the large case.
Depends on
- Spherical Gram simplices and angular links of Euclidean faces
- Gram realisations, radial normalisation, finite spherical complexes and link Gram formulas
- Abstract isometric polyhedral gluings and the chain metric
- The angular path metric, the Euclidean cone and spherical joins
- An abstract simplicial complex
- Subcomplexes, closures, stars, and links in a simplicial complex
- Metric space: $d(x,y) = 0$ iff $x = y$, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric
- Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia $(p,q,r)$, rank $p+q$, and signature $p-q$ of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form
Used by
- The Coxeter nerve is CAT(1), and its girth and the girths of all its links are at least 2π Corollary
- The Coxeter nerve and its Moussong metric Definition
- Link angles in A2, affine A2 and the universal Coxeter nerve Example
- The affine Ã₂ nerve: every edge exists, the Gram determinant vanishes, and the perimeter is exactly 2π Example
- The all-right triangle must be filled; the disconnected universal-Coxeter nerve is CAT(1) vacuously Example
- Face links of large metric flag complexes, and the inductive local CAT(1) criterion Lemma
- Minimum nonshrinkable loops, radial vertex cones, and the excursion of length π Lemma
- The angular link of a vertex of the Davis complex is the large metric flag nerve Lemma
- Finite large metric flag complexes are CAT(1) Theorem
- Nonshrinkable edge loops of length <2π have three edges, and the finite locally CAT(1) large metric flag complex is CAT(1) Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ruth Charney and Michael W. Davis, The Euler characteristic of a nonpositively curved, piecewise Euclidean manifold, Pacific J. Math. 171 (1995) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Philip Moeller, A note on almost negative matrices and Gromov-hyperbolic Coxeter groups, arXiv:2205.07791 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michael W. Davis, The Geometry and Topology of Coxeter Groups (first-edition author manuscript, 2007-2008) (standard reference, not scraped)
- G. Moussong, Hyperbolic Coxeter groups, PhD thesis (Ohio State University 1988), McCammond transcription (standard reference, not scraped)