How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Chacon three cut one spacer towers
Definition
Work on with the Lebesgue measurable sets and restricted set function introduced in Lebesgue measurable sets, the family , and the restricted set function . Under the countable-choice consequence of The Axiom of Choice, Assuming countable choice, is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and is a complete measure extending elementary volume makes this a complete measure space. The same assumption supplies the countable choice in A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included used for the actual interval measures below. The finite interval recursion itself is choice-free.
The stage-zero tower is the ordered list consisting of ; its reservoir is . Suppose the stage- list is , with equal width . Cut each physical half-open interval into its left, middle and right thirds . The next ordered list is where is taken from the left end of and retained as a new level. Put .
The height and width obey , and . Indeed the initial width is ; taking thirds divides it by three, and . The spacer and the remaining reservoir partition the previous reservoir; all old levels partition into their thirds. Thus by finite induction the new intervals are pairwise disjoint and, together with , partition .
Induction also gives : the initial value is one, and . Consequently the tower union has measure , and the reservoir has measure . Every interval is left-closed and right-open; no endpoint belongs to two levels.
Define on by the unique translation taking to . If their left endpoints are , that formula is on . At stage zero this is the empty partial map. Its range is . The existence of an invertible limiting probability transformation is a separate lemma, not part of the finite definition.
Depends on
- Lebesgue measurable sets, the family $\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{R}^n)$, and the restricted set function $\lambda_n$
- Assuming countable choice, $\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and $\lambda_n$ is a complete measure extending elementary volume
- A box in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with parameters $a_i\le b_i$ is Lebesgue measurable of measure $\prod_{i<n}(b_i-a_i)$, whichever of its faces are included
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- Chacon correlation subsequence prevents mixing Counterexample
- Chacon spacer measure budget Example
- First three chacon tower heights Example
- Weak mixing implies strong mixing False statement
- Chacon eigenfunctions are constant Lemma
- Chacon levels approximate measurable sets Lemma
- Chacon partial maps extend to an invertible map mod null sets Lemma
- Chacon tower height correlations obstruct mixing Lemma
- Chacon transformation is ergodic Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Varju, Topics in Ergodic Theory, Michaelmas 2016, section 11 pp.36–40 (complete Chacon argument; public mirror) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Sarig Problem 3.8 pp.99–101 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Katok–Thouvenot §5.2.3 pp.696–697 (standard reference, not scraped)