How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Commensurator, unitary characters and monomial induced representations in the transversal model
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a topological group and an open subgroup. The commensurator of is A unitary character of is a continuous homomorphism , where . Choose a right transversal for the left cosets of , so , and choose it with . For each and , there are unique and such that . The monomial induced representation acts on by This is a strongly continuous unitary representation, and is cyclic. If is locally compact, this transversal model is unitarily equivalent to the quotient covariant-function model of Continuous covariant model and measurable completion and hence is the standard unitary induction of from (Unitary induction from a closed subgroup). When is second-countable, is countable and the transversal model is separable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; a topological group ; an open subgroup ; a continuous unitary character ; and a right transversal with .
AC supplies a choice function for any family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Choice).
For a closed subgroup and a strongly continuous unitary representation of it, the covariant-function model and its quotient-norm completion are defined (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).
For locally compact and closed , this completed model with its induced action is the standard unitary induction; when the quotient measure is invariant, its density cocycle is (Unitary induction from a closed subgroup).
Proof
Define when has finite index in both subgroups. Reflexivity and symmetry are immediate. If and , then has finite index in because has finite index in ; it therefore has finite index in . The same argument, starting with , shows it has finite index in . Thus is transitive. Conjugation preserves finite indices and intersections. For , conjugating by gives , while ; hence and . Conjugating by gives , so . Every satisfies . Therefore the commensurator is a subgroup containing .
Uniqueness of gives and . Substitution into the formula for yields . Right multiplication permutes , and every multiplier has modulus , so each is unitary.
Suppose now is locally compact. The open subgroup is also closed. Its right-coset space is discrete. Restrict a left Haar measure on to ; this is a left Haar measure on , and partitioning into the cosets shows that the Weil quotient formula with constant gives counting measure on . For the covariant model in [F2], define . Every finitely supported function on arises this way: on each open coset set , and set it to zero on cosets outside the finite support. This is continuous and covariant, so extends to a unitary from the completed model to . If , then and covariance gives . Hence intertwines the covariant left action with . By [F3], this is standard unitary induction.
For each , the subgroup is an open neighborhood of . On it and , so as . Continuity follows on finite-support vectors by linearity. For arbitrary , approximate by a finite-support and use ; thus continuity holds at on all vectors, and the representation law gives it at every . Since for every , is cyclic.
If is second-countable, let be a countable base. Each left coset is nonempty and open, so let be the least with . Disjoint cosets have distinct such basis elements; thus is countable. Under AC choose a representative from each coset, so is countable. Finite-support functions with rational real and imaginary parts form a countable dense subset of , proving separability. Once a transversal is given, all constructions and calculations above use no further choice.
Depends on
Used by
- Irreducible multiplicity data is not canonical outside type I Counterexample
- Mackey-Shoda irreducibility criterion for monomial representations Lemma
- Mackey-Shoda non-equivalence criterion for monomial representations Lemma
- Matrix-coefficient properties of the transversal model of a monomial representation Lemma
- The two cyclic basis factors of the rank-two free group are self-commensurating with trivial cross-conjugate intersections Lemma
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bachir Bekka and Pierre de la Harpe, Unitary Representations of Groups, Duals, and Characters (arXiv:1912.07262v1, 16 December 2019) (standard reference, not scraped)