How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hybrid mimetic finite-volume diffusion on general meshes
Definition
Let be a cell-face mesh as in Finite-volume cell-face meshes and geometric regularity, with the volume centroid of each cell and the face centroid. For the mimetic branch require the following explicit face-moment closure on each cell: Here is the identity matrix on and . These are finite geometric checks on the face data; they impose no center-to-face orthogonality. For every cell use one real cell-mean unknown ; for every face use one shared real face-mean unknown . On a boundary face , the value is prescribed. Write for the outward unit normal. Define the reconstructed cell gradient and its face residual by Interpret and as cell and face averages. For a symmetric positive-definite tensor constant on (so for every nonzero ), define where is the smallest eigenvalue of . For , the linear hybrid mimetic scheme with homogeneous Dirichlet data is to find all cell and interior-face values such that for every test vector whose boundary face values are zero. For each local face , let have face value on , zero on the other faces of , and cell value zero. Define the outward numerical flux .
There is also a monotone -growth backward-Euler extension, specified as an algebraic scheme but with no existence or convergence claim in this definition. Let , set , and let be a Carathéodory flux, meaning that is measurable for each fixed and is continuous for almost every . Assume there are constants , a nonnegative , and a nonnegative such that, outside one null set, For each cell set , and fix . Put for and . Its spatial operator, linear in the test vector , is For this extension define . On a time partition , given and , put . The backward-Euler step seeks with zero boundary face values satisfying for every test vector with zero boundary face values. The formula specifies a candidate discrete method; solvability and convergence require separate results.
For an affine function , its cell and face averages satisfy and by the displayed face-moment closure. The drawing illustrates the cell and face degrees of freedom on a skew cell; no center-to-face orthogonality is assumed.
When , , and , the nonlinear formula agrees with the linear form above. Neither specification by itself proves solvability, a conforming reconstruction, or a mesh-uniform discrete Aubin–Lions estimate; those require separate results or hypotheses.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · one level
1 result within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jérôme Droniou, Finite volume schemes for diffusion equations: introduction to and review of modern methods, 2014 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Konstantin Lipnikov and Gianmarco Manzini, Discretization of mixed formulations of elliptic problems on polyhedral meshes, 2016 (standard reference, not scraped)