How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Energy and computed-state compactness for hybrid mimetic backward Euler
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let hybrid meshes in Hybrid mimetic finite-volume diffusion on general meshes form a regular simplicial companion family, with cell points equal to volume centroids, and let uniformly. Let , , and let have precisely the Carathéodory, growth, coercivity and monotonicity hypotheses of Coercive monotone p-growth diffusion fluxes. Let , , and let initial cell states obey strongly in . Each finite backward-Euler step in the hybrid Definition has a solution. Initial face values can be set arbitrarily because only initial cell values occur in the time term.
On arbitrary time partitions with maximum step , every selection of step solutions satisfies, uniformly in , Here are as in Finite-volume companions, mean tests and weak-gradient closure. Extend by on . The piecewise affine interpolation of has derivative bounded in , . There are a subsequence and such that No mesh/time coupling or time-step ratio restriction is required.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and exactly the geometry, coefficient, data, exponent and initial convergence hypotheses above.
Finite-volume companions, mean tests and weak-gradient closure gives , , the conforming companion error in , and .
Hybrid mimetic finite-volume diffusion on general meshes gives the exact discrete equation, averaged flux , and stabilization. Coercive monotone p-growth diffusion fluxes supplies the one-null-set growth, coercivity and monotonicity conditions. An outward-pointing finite-dimensional map has a zero gives a zero of a continuous outward-pointing finite-dimensional map.
The subcritical W0 one p embedding into L2 gives ; Compactness of on bounded open sets also gives . Weak compactness of bounded space-time Sobolev gradients gives weak compactness of companions once their images converge strongly. The finite-projection compactness argument for time sequences is proved in Piecewise-constant discrete Aubin–Lions compactness; its conforming-state hypothesis will be replaced explicitly below by [F1].
Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases and Dominated convergence supply the integral estimates and continuity of cell averages at a fixed bounded finite-dimensional argument.
Proof
The quantity is a norm on the finite zero-boundary cell-face space: if it vanishes, and , so ; connectedness and the boundary faces force every value to zero. Coercivity in [F2] and the lower stabilization bound give , writing for the flux's coercivity datum. At a fixed step the mass term paired with is bounded below by , and the source term is at most by [F1]. The averaged cell flux is continuous in its finite-dimensional arguments by its growth bound and dominated convergence on bounded argument sets. Thus the equation's coordinate residual is continuous and its pairing with is positive on every sufficiently large Euclidean sphere, since finite-dimensional norm equivalence and make the term dominate the linear terms. Brouwer [F2] gives a solution, inductively at every step. No mesh-uniform sphere radius is needed for existence.
Test each step by and use in the volume-weighted cell inner product. Hölder and [F1] bound the source by , which is at most : this scalar Young bound follows by maximizing over . Multiply by and sum to any terminal index. Jensen for the cell/time averages gives . Coercivity contributes at worst . The initial norms are bounded by strong initialization, giving all three displayed energy bounds and the bound on .
For , test a time step by . Because its cell values are the exact cell means, the mass term is exactly and the load is exactly . Growth and Hölder give : the flux term uses , and the stabilization term uses its weighted Hölder bound . Hence . Since , step 2.1 gives the asserted derivative bound for the affine cell-state interpolation.
Fix . Compactness gives a finite-dimensional subspace and its -orthogonal projection such that for all : take a finite -net of the unit ball's image and span its centers. By [F1], . Each coefficient , in a fixed orthonormal basis of , is bounded uniformly in by step 2.1, and its affine interpolant has derivative bounded in by step 3.1. Hölder gives its common modulus . Finite-grid rounding therefore makes these finitely many coefficients totally bounded in the uniform norm. Their largest nodal jumps are at most , so the piecewise constant coefficients have the same compactness. The projection remainder tends to zero as first and then . Completeness of and AC extract strong convergence there. This proves compactness for the actual cell states without falsely applying a conforming-state theorem to them.
The companions differ from the cell states by in and are bounded in . Thus [F3] gives and weak companion convergence. The uniform cell-state bound passes to by almost-everywhere convergence along a further subsequence. It upgrades strong convergence to every finite : finite-measure Hölder treats , while treats . The bounded fields have weak subsequences; the weak-gradient defect in [F1], integrated in time, identifies every such limit as .
Compactness and continuous give for each an Ehrling estimate . Indeed, if this failed, normalize counterexamples to , with and . Compactness in gives a limit of norm one, while the convergence makes that limit zero as a distribution, a contradiction. Apply this estimate to , whose norm is bounded and whose norm tends to zero. It tends to zero in after and then . Its distance from is by [F1]. This proves the remaining strong convergence. All arguments used only and separately.
Depends on
- Hybrid mimetic finite-volume diffusion on general meshes
- Finite-volume families with a regular simplicial companion
- Finite-volume companions, mean tests and weak-gradient closure
- Coercive monotone p-growth diffusion fluxes
- An outward-pointing finite-dimensional map has a zero
- The subcritical W0 one p embedding into L2
- Weak compactness of bounded space-time Sobolev gradients
- Compactness of $W^{1,p}_0(\Omega)\hookrightarrow L^p(\Omega)$ on bounded open sets
- Piecewise-constant discrete Aubin–Lions compactness
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Dominated convergence
- The Axiom of Choice
- Reflexivity of Lp for one less p less infinity
- Reflexivity is equivalent to weak subsequential compactness of bounded sequences
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
79 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jérôme Droniou, Finite volume schemes for diffusion equations: introduction to and review of modern methods, 2014 (standard reference, not scraped)