Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Energy and computed-state compactness for hybrid mimetic backward Euler

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let hybrid meshes in Hybrid mimetic finite-volume diffusion on general meshes form a regular simplicial companion family, with cell points equal to volume centroids, and let 0<α‾≤α0,K≤α‾<∞ uniformly. Let p>max⁡(1,2d/(d+2)), p′=p/(p−1), and let a have precisely the Carathéodory, growth, coercivity and monotonicity hypotheses of Coercive monotone p-growth diffusion fluxes. Let f∈Lp′(Q), Q=(0,T)×Ω, and let initial cell states obey ΠhUh0→u0 strongly in H=L2(Ω). Each finite backward-Euler step in the hybrid Definition has a solution. Initial face values can be set arbitrarily because only initial cell values occur in the time term.

On arbitrary time partitions with maximum step δh→0, every selection of step solutions satisfies, uniformly in h, max⁡n∥ΠhUhn∥22+∑n∥Πh(Uhn−Uhn−1)∥22+∑nτnBh,p(Uhn)p≤C. Here Bh,p,Dh,p,Sh,p,Gh are as in Finite-volume companions, mean tests and weak-gradient closure. Extend U‾h by Uhn on (tn−1,tn]. The piecewise affine interpolation of ΠhUhn has derivative bounded in Lp′(0,T;V∗), V=W01,p(Ω). There are a subsequence and u∈Lp(0,T;V)∩L∞(0,T;H) such that ΠhU‾h→u in Lr(0,T;H) (1≤r<∞) and in Lp(Q), EhU‾h⇀u in Lp(0,T;V),GhU‾h⇀∇u in Lp(Q;Rd). No mesh/time coupling or time-step ratio restriction is required.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and exactly the geometry, coefficient, data, exponent and initial convergence hypotheses above.

[F1]

Finite-volume companions, mean tests and weak-gradient closure gives Dh,p≍Bh,p, ∥Πhv∥p+∥Πhv∥2≤CBh,p(v), the conforming companion error ChϑBh,p in H, and Dh,p(Ihz)≤C∥z∥V.

[F2]

Hybrid mimetic finite-volume diffusion on general meshes gives the exact discrete equation, averaged flux bK, and stabilization. Coercive monotone p-growth diffusion fluxes supplies the one-null-set growth, coercivity and monotonicity conditions. An outward-pointing finite-dimensional map has a zero gives a zero of a continuous outward-pointing finite-dimensional map.

[F3]

The subcritical W0 one p embedding into L2 gives V⋐H; Compactness of W01,p(Ω)↪Lp(Ω) on bounded open sets also gives V⋐Lp(Ω). Weak compactness of bounded space-time Sobolev gradients gives weak compactness of companions once their H images converge strongly. The finite-projection compactness argument for time sequences is proved in Piecewise-constant discrete Aubin–Lions compactness; its conforming-state hypothesis will be replaced explicitly below by [F1].

[F4]

Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases and Dominated convergence supply the integral estimates and continuity of cell averages at a fixed bounded finite-dimensional argument.

Proof

1.1F1F2F4givenconstructalgebra

The quantity Bh,p is a norm on the finite zero-boundary cell-face space: if it vanishes, GK=0 and ρK,F=0, so vK=vF; connectedness and the boundary faces force every value to zero. Coercivity in [F2] and the lower stabilization bound give ∑KAh,K(v;v)≥cBh,p(v)p−∥h0∥1, writing h0 for the flux's coercivity datum. At a fixed step the mass term paired with v is bounded below by −Ch∥ΠhUn−1∥2Bh,p(v), and the source term is at most C∥fn∥p′Bh,p(v) by [F1]. The averaged cell flux is continuous in its finite-dimensional arguments by its growth bound and dominated convergence on bounded argument sets. Thus the equation's coordinate residual is continuous and its pairing with v is positive on every sufficiently large Euclidean sphere, since finite-dimensional norm equivalence and p>1 make the Bh,pp term dominate the linear terms. Brouwer [F2] gives a solution, inductively at every step. No mesh-uniform sphere radius is needed for existence.

2.1F1F2F4step 1.1algebra

Test each step by Un and use 2(a−b)a=a2−b2+(a−b)2 in the volume-weighted cell inner product. Hölder and [F1] bound the source by C∥fn∥p′Bh,p(Un), which is at most (c/2)Bh,p(Un)p+C∥fn∥p′p′: this scalar Young bound follows by maximizing xy−(c/2)yp over y≥0. Multiply by τn and sum to any terminal index. Jensen for the cell/time averages gives ∑nτn∥fn∥p′p′≤∥f∥Lp′(Q)p′. Coercivity contributes at worst T∥h0∥1. The initial norms are bounded by strong initialization, giving all three displayed energy bounds and the Lp bound on Bh,p.

3.1F1F2F4step 2.1algebra

For z∈V, test a time step by Ihz. Because its cell values are the exact cell means, the mass term is exactly ∫ΩDt(ΠhUn)z and the load is exactly ∫Ωfnz. Growth and Hölder give ∣∑KAh,K(Un;Ihz)∣≤C(∥g∥p′+Bh,p(Un)p−1)∥z∥V: the flux term uses ∥GhIhz∥p≤C∥z∥V, and the stabilization term uses its weighted Hölder bound CSh,p(Un)p−1Sh,p(Ihz). Hence ∥DtΠhUn∥V∗≤C(∥fn∥p′+∥g∥p′+Bh,p(Un)p−1). Since (p−1)p′=p, step 2.1 gives the asserted derivative bound for the affine cell-state interpolation.

4.1F1F3F4step 2.1step 3.1chooseconstruct

Fix ε>0. Compactness V⋐H gives a finite-dimensional subspace Z⊂V and its H-orthogonal projection PZ such that ∥(I−PZ)v∥H≤ε∥v∥V for all v∈V: take a finite ε-net of the V unit ball's image and span its centers. By [F1], ∥(I−PZ)ΠhU‾h∥Lp(H)≤C(hϑ+ε). Each coefficient (ΠhUn,z)H, z in a fixed orthonormal basis of Z, is bounded uniformly in n by step 2.1, and its affine interpolant has derivative bounded in Lp′ by step 3.1. Hölder gives its common modulus C∣t−s∣1/p. Finite-grid rounding therefore makes these finitely many coefficients totally bounded in the uniform norm. Their largest nodal jumps are at most Cδh1/p, so the piecewise constant coefficients have the same compactness. The projection remainder tends to zero as first h→0 and then ε↓0. Completeness of Lp(H) and AC extract strong convergence there. This proves compactness for the actual cell states without falsely applying a conforming-state theorem to them.

5.1F1F3step 2.1step 4.1algebra

The companions differ from the cell states by Chϑ in Lp(H) and are bounded in Lp(V). Thus [F3] gives u∈Lp(V) and weak companion convergence. The uniform cell-state L∞(H) bound passes to u by almost-everywhere H convergence along a further subsequence. It upgrades strong Lp(H) convergence to every finite Lr(H): finite-measure Hölder treats r<p, while ∥vh−u∥Lr(H)r≤(2M)r−p∥vh−u∥Lp(H)p treats r≥p. The bounded fields GhU‾h have weak Lp subsequences; the weak-gradient defect in [F1], integrated in time, identifies every such limit as ∇u.

6.1F1F3step 5.1algebra∎

Compactness V⋐Lp and continuous V→H give for each ε>0 an Ehrling estimate ∥z∥p≤ε∥z∥V+Cε∥z∥H. Indeed, if this failed, normalize counterexamples to ∥zj∥p=1, with ∥zj∥V≤1/ε and ∥zj∥H→0. Compactness in Lp gives a limit of norm one, while the H convergence makes that limit zero as a distribution, a contradiction. Apply this estimate to EhU‾h−u, whose Lp(V) norm is bounded and whose Lp(H) norm tends to zero. It tends to zero in Lp(Q) after h→0 and then ε↓0. Its Lp(Q) distance from ΠhU‾h is O(h) by [F1]. This proves the remaining strong convergence. All arguments used only h→0 and δh→0 separately.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

79 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources