How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Conditional monotone finite-volume parabolic limit identification
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be bounded and open, , let , put , with gradient norm, , and for . Let satisfy the Carathéodory, -growth, coercivity, and monotonicity hypotheses of Coercive monotone p-growth diffusion fluxes.
For each , let be a finite measurable partition of into cells of positive measure and let a finite time partition carry cell values. Let be the function constant on each resulting space-time cell. Suppose there are conforming reconstructions and a function such that and . Write and . Assume, along the same subsequence, in and Finally, assume , , and the finite-volume weak identities have residuals for every : Then almost everywhere, and is a weak evolution solution of with initial trace , in the sense of Coercive monotone p-growth diffusion fluxes: for every such test function. This is a conditional finite-volume limit-identification result; the reconstruction, residual, compactness, and energy hypotheses are not conclusions of the statement.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice; the domain, exponent, spaces and monotone flux; the finite-volume states and conforming reconstructions; their strong and weak convergence hypotheses; the energy limsup; and the residual weak identities.
Banach evolution triples and weak time derivatives: embeds densely and continuously into with the stated real-space pairing.
Coercive monotone p-growth diffusion fluxes: outside one null set, is continuous and monotone, and has the stated -growth.
Weak compactness of bounded space-time Sobolev gradients: under the Axiom of Choice, a bounded sequence in whose images converge strongly in has a subsequence with weakly convergent space-time gradients, and the strong limit is the image of the weak limit.
Minty identification for a monotone Carathéodory flux: if in , in , and , then almost everywhere.
The Banach evolution-space energy identity and H trace: assuming AC, if and , then has a unique continuous representative on .
One-dimensional functions have unique absolutely continuous representatives: assuming AC, a scalar class has an absolutely continuous representative on whose increments are integrals of its weak derivative.
The Axiom of Choice is assumed for supplier conclusions [F3]–[F6].
The finite-volume state reconstruction and conforming reconstruction differ by a term tending to zero in ; the discrete weak residual tends to zero on every stated test; and the flux-energy limsup holds.
The limit belongs to , as stated; this is an already available sufficient bound, while the broadened PE12 continuous-trace result does not require it as an extra hypothesis.
Proof
The strong convergence and the reconstruction estimate in [A2] imply strongly in . The sequence is bounded in , so [F3] gives, after subsequence extraction, in and in .
Fix . Strong convergence of gives ; weak convergence of gives . The source and initial terms are fixed, and [A2] gives . Passing to the limit in the discrete weak identity therefore yields
Step 1.1 gives in , the statement gives in , and the assumed energy limsup is exactly the remaining hypothesis of [F4]. Thus [F4] implies almost everywhere.
For and , use in step 2.1. The weak identity shows in distributions that , where . By H"older and the Poincar'e norm equivalence in [F2], for almost every . Thus . The identity extends from smooth to every by the defining density of in and the displayed bound, so it is the distributional derivative from [F1]. Hence .
By [A1], [A3], step 3.1, and the assumed , the continuous-trace theorem [F5] gives a unique representative .
Fix and . The scalar function is bounded on by [A3], and its distributional derivative lies in by step 3.1 and finite . Thus it belongs to , so [A1] and [F6] give an absolutely continuous representative and integration by parts on . This representative agrees almost everywhere with the continuous scalar function from step 4.1; since both are continuous, they agree everywhere, including at . Apply step 2.1 to and use from step 3.1. The bulk terms cancel and leave . Choose . This holds for every smooth compactly supported , which is dense in ; therefore in .
By step 3.1 and the definition of the induced operator in [F2], in after substituting from step 2.2. Step 4.1 gives the required continuous representative and step 5.1 gives its initial trace. These are exactly the weak evolution solution conditions of [F2].
Remarks
The conditional assumptions are explicit. In particular, the weak-gradient supplier [F3] requires conforming reconstructions, and [A3] records the bound already assumed here; the broadened PE12 chain rule supplies the trace without requiring that bound as an extra premise. This lemma does not establish that a particular hybrid finite-volume scheme supplies these assumptions or the required residual and energy limits.
Depends on
- Banach evolution triples and weak time derivatives
- Coercive monotone p-growth diffusion fluxes
- Weak compactness of bounded space-time Sobolev gradients
- Minty identification for a monotone Carathéodory flux
- The Banach evolution-space energy identity and H trace
- One-dimensional $W^{1,p}$ functions have unique absolutely continuous representatives
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
59 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jérôme Droniou, Finite volume schemes for diffusion equations: introduction to and review of modern methods, 2014 (standard reference, not scraped)