Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-volume companions, mean tests and weak-gradient closure

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and a family in Finite-volume families with a regular simplicial companion. For 1<p<∞ and zero boundary face values, put Bh,p(v)p=∑K∣K∣∣GKv∣p+Sh,p(v)p,Sh,p(v)p=∑K,F∣F∣dK,F1−p∣ρK,F(v)∣p, where GK,ρK,F have the formulas in Hybrid mimetic finite-volume diffusion on general meshes. Then, with constants independent of h,v, C−1Dh,p(v)≤Bh,p(v)≤CDh,p(v),∥Ehv∥W1,p≤CDh,p(v),∥Πhv−Ehv∥Lp≤ChDh,p(v). Here Ehv∈W01,p(Ω). If p>max⁡(1,2d/(d+2)) and ϑ=1−dmax⁡(1/p−1/2,0)>0, also ∥Πhv−Ehv∥2≤ChϑDh,p(v),∥Πhv∥2+∥Πhv∥p≤CDh,p(v). For z∈W01,p(Ω), Dh,p(Ihz)≤C∥∇z∥p. If the cell points are volume centroids, then for smooth z with compact support in Ω, GhIhz→∇z uniformly and Sh,p(Ihz)≤Ch∥D2z∥∞, where Ghv∣K=GKv. Finally, for every smooth vector field ϕ on a neighborhood of Ω‾, ∣∫ΩGhv⋅ϕ+Πhv div⁡ϕ∣≤ChDh,p(v)∥∇ϕ∥∞. Consequently bounded Dh,p(vh), strong Lp convergence Πhvh→v, and weak Lp convergence Ghvh⇀g imply g=∇v distributionally. The same statements hold after integration in time with the corresponding Lp bounds.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the explicit regular companion geometry, 1<p<∞, the mean interpolator and zero boundary cell-face vectors.

[F1]

Finite-volume families with a regular simplicial companion gives ∣K∣≍hd, ∣F∣≍hd−1, dK,F≍h, shape-regular simplex maps, and uniformly bounded vertex-star paths.

[F2]

Sobolev face traces and Gauss–Green on a reference simplex and Poincare–Wirtinger inequality on a reference simplex give the W1,p face trace, Gauss–Green and mean-zero Poincaré inequalities. Affine rescaling gives on a subdivision simplex S and facet e the bounds ∥z∥Lp(e)≤C(h−1/p∥z∥Lp(S)+h1−1/p∥∇z∥Lp(S)) and ∥z−zS∥Lp(S)≤Ch∥∇z∥Lp(S).

[F3]

Hybrid mimetic finite-volume diffusion on general meshes defines GK and ρK,F; its face-moment identities hold for actual polytopes by applying simplex Gauss–Green to constants and coordinate functions and cancelling subdivision facets.

[F4]

The Poincare inequality for zero-boundary Sobolev closures on domains bounded in one direction bounds ∥w∥p by ∥∇w∥p for w∈W01,p; The subcritical W0 one p embedding into L2 gives the continuous W01,p→L2 inclusion on the strict stated branch. Finite-sum and integral Hölder inequalities are Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases.

Proof

1.1F1F3F4givenalgebra

Write jK,F=vF−vK. The moment cancellation gives GKv=∣K∣−1∑F∣F∣jK,FnK,F. Hölder, the bounded face count and [F1] imply ∣K∣∣GKv∣p≤C∑Fhd−p∣jK,F∣p. Since ρK,F=jK,F−GKv⋅(xF−xK) and ∣xF−xK∣≤Ch, summing gives Bh,p≤CDh,p. Conversely jK,F=ρK,F+GKv⋅(xF−xK) gives Dh,p≤CBh,p.

1.2F1givenconstructalgebra

If K,L share F, vK−vL=jL,F−jK,F. Along a supplied vertex-star path, the difference between vK and any other incident cell value is a sum of at most 2J such increments. At a boundary vertex the same telescoping ends at a zero boundary face. Hence for every simplex S⊂K‾ and its vertex z, ∣(Ehv)(z)−vK∣p≤C∑(L,F)∈N(K)∣jL,F∣p, where N(K) is the union of the finitely many supplied paths at its vertices. These sets have bounded cardinality and bounded overlap: a cell has at most J(d+1) subdivision vertices and each vertex has at most J incident cells.

1.3F1F2F4algebra

The scaled simplex estimates [F2] first bound the difference between the mean on a simplex and the mean on one of its facets by Ch1−d/p∥∇z∥Lp(S). Means on adjacent simplices differ by the sum of their differences to the shared facet mean, since their traces agree. The fan subdivision is a connected finite union of at most J simplices. Telescoping between their means, and averaging over each original cell or original face, therefore gives ∣(Ihz)F−(Ihz)K∣p≤Chp−d∫K∣∇z∣p. The same trace argument applies to boundary faces; zero-boundary approximation makes their means zero. Multiplication by ∣F∣dK,F1−p≍hd−p and summation proves Dh,p(Ihz)≤C∥∇z∥p.

1.4F1F2F3algebra

For smooth z, Gauss–Green gives GKIhz=∣K∣−1∫K∇z exactly. On each cell Taylor expansion around its centroid and the corresponding face averages show ∣(Ihz)F−(Ihz)K−GKIhz⋅(xF−xK)∣≤Ch2∥D2z∥∞ under the stated centroid hypothesis. Thus for this mean interpolator the residual sum is at most Chp∥D2z∥∞p, because there are O(h−d) cells. Uniform continuity of ∇z gives the asserted gradient consistency.

2.1F1F4step 1.2constructalgebra

Barycentric coordinates on S have absolute value at most one and gradients at most C/h, by the inradius bound. Applying step 1.2 to Ehv−vK gives its pth-power Lp(S) norm at most Chd times the path sum, and its gradient norm at most Chd−p times that sum. Summing with bounded overlap proves ∥Ehv−Πhv∥p≤ChDh,p and ∥∇Ehv∥p≤CDh,p. The continuous piecewise affine function vanishes on all boundary facets. Its zero extension is globally Lipschitz and has compact support: along a segment, the finite simplex pieces and the exterior zero pieces have derivative bounded by the largest simplex gradient and agree at crossings. To verify the zero-boundary closure directly, multiply by max⁡(0,min⁡(1,kdist⁡(x,∂Ω)−1)). The error and its gradient are supported in shrinking boundary layers, and ∣Ehv(x)∣≤Ldist⁡(x,∂Ω) bounds the cutoff-gradient term by 2L on the layer 1/k<dist⁡(x,∂Ω)<2/k. They tend to zero in W1,p by absolute continuity of the integral. Each cutoff is Lipschitz with compact support in Ω and can be mollified inside Ω, producing smooth compactly supported approximants. Thus Ehv∈W01,p, and [F4] proves the full W1,p bound and the Lp state bound.

3.1F1F4step 2.1algebra

For p<2, the same barycentric estimate in L2(S) and ℓ2≤ℓp for the combined finite coefficient list give ∥Ehv−Πhv∥2≤Chd/2(∑K,F∣jK,F∣p)1/p≤Ch1+d/2−d/pDh,p. For p≥2, finite-measure Hölder and step 2.1 give ChDh,p instead. The exponent is positive precisely on the stated strict branch. The continuous embedding [F4] bounds ∥Ehv∥2, proving the state L2 estimate as well.

4.1F1F2F4step 1.1givenalgebra∎

Let ϕK and ϕF denote vector means over cells and faces. Gauss–Green, shared face cancellation and vF=0 on the boundary give exactly ∫Ghv⋅ϕ+Πhvdiv⁡ϕ=∑K,F∣F∣jK,FnK,F⋅(ϕK−ϕF). Since ∣ϕK−ϕF∣≤Ch∥∇ϕ∥∞, Hölder bounds this by ChDh,p(∑K,F∣F∣dK,F)1/p′∥∇ϕ∥∞. The last sum is uniformly bounded by [F1], proving the estimate. Strong and weak convergence pass its left side to ∫g⋅ϕ+vdiv⁡ϕ, which is zero; interior compactly supported tests identify g=∇v. Hölder in time gives the same assertions for space-time bounds.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources