How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The subcritical W0 one p embedding into L2
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let , let be a bounded open set, and let satisfy . Then is continuously and compactly embedded in . In particular, the inclusion is dense. No boundary regularity is required.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice; a bounded open set ; ; and with .
For , if and , then is compactly embedded in for every bounded open , without boundary regularity (Subcritical compactness for on arbitrary bounded open sets).
For and , the zero-boundary Sobolev inequality is , where (The Sobolev inequality for zero-boundary Sobolev closures on open sets).
On a finite-measure set, Hölder gives when (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).
For any open , zero extension maps isometrically into , with weak gradient the zero extension of (Zero extension of W_0^{1,p} has no boundary derivative).
For every open , is dense in ; if is bounded, then and uniform convergence on a fixed compact interval implies convergence (Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in , Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of has finite outer measure).
For a differentiable real function on a compact interval, the fundamental theorem gives the endpoint difference as the integral of the derivative; Hölder bounds that integral by the interval length to the power times the derivative's norm (If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz, Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).
Under Countable Choice and Dependent Choice, a uniformly bounded equicontinuous family in has compact closure in the supremum norm (Arzelà--Ascoli for real under Countable Choice and Dependent Choice: compact closure iff equicontinuous and pointwise bounded).
is the norm closure of in , and the Sobolev norm includes the function and weak first derivatives (Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).
The Axiom of Choice supplies Countable Choice and Dependent Choice; these are used by [F1], [F4], [F5], and [F7] (The Axiom of Choice, AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration, The Axiom of Countable Choice (), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain).
A compact embedding is a continuous inclusion whose image of each bounded set has compact closure; under the stated choice assumptions this is equivalent to the sequential subsequence form used below (Compactly embedded normed spaces).
Proof
If , then and the conclusion holds. Assume . First consider . Choose a bounded open interval with and let . By [F4] and the closure definition [F8], each has zero extension : choose converging to in and extend each by zero into . Countable Choice selects this approximating sequence. For every such smooth extension , [F6] gives and , because it vanishes near both endpoints. Applying the second inequality to differences shows that is uniformly Cauchy; its continuous uniform limit represents since in . For every , uniform convergence and in give . Thus weakly and [F4] gives . Passing to the limit in the two displayed inequalities gives the same Hölder and supremum bounds for .
Now let . Put and . The strict hypothesis gives ; set . Then , , and . By finite-measure Hölder [F3], continuously: the function and gradient norms are bounded by their norms, and a approximating sequence in also converges in . Therefore [F1] gives compactness of .
For a bounded sequence in , the representatives from step 1.1 are uniformly bounded by and share the modulus . Arzelà–Ascoli [F7] gives a uniformly convergent subsequence on the fixed compact interval . Its restrictions converge in by [F5], proving compactness. For each the same supremum estimate gives , proving continuity.
In the branch, for , [F2] and [F3] yield the continuous estimate , using the Sobolev inequality [F2] with exponent . Thus the inclusion is continuous on the norm. Finally [F5] and the closure definition [F8] give dense in . The preceding arguments prove the complete and branches; [F9] then gives the claimed compact embedding in its continuous/sequential sense.
Depends on
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure
- Subcritical compactness for $W^{1,p}_0$ on arbitrary bounded open sets
- The Sobolev inequality for zero-boundary Sobolev closures on open sets
- Zero extension of W_0^{1,p} has no boundary derivative
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- If $f : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}^m$ is differentiable with integrable $f'$ then $\int_a^b f' = f(b)-f(a)$; and a bounded derivative makes $f$ Lipschitz
- Arzelà--Ascoli for real $C(K)$ under Countable Choice and Dependent Choice: compact closure iff equicontinuous and pointwise bounded
- Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in $L^2$
- Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ has finite outer measure
- The Axiom of Choice
- AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- Compactly embedded normed spaces
Used by
- Coercive monotone p-growth diffusion fluxes Definition
- The p-Laplacian is an admissible monotone diffusion Example
- Energy and computed-state compactness for hybrid mimetic backward Euler Lemma
- Finite-volume companions, mean tests and weak-gradient closure Lemma
- Conditional monotone finite-element convergence Theorem
- Discrete TPFA Rellich compactness and physical weak gradients Theorem
- L2 projections are uniformly W1p-stable on quasi-uniform conforming meshes Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
118 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Haim Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations, Springer Universitext, 2011 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tomáš Roubíček, Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations with Applications, 2nd ed., Birkhäuser, 2005 (standard reference, not scraped)