How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Piecewise-constant discrete Aubin–Lions compactness
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let be a Banach evolution triple. For each , let be a partition with maximum step , let , and define on and there. Suppose, for some and , Then the time translates satisfy, on their common intervals, and is relatively compact in . If also , every convergent subsequence converges in every with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, the compact and continuous embeddings, the partitions and node values, and the two uniform Bochner bounds in the statement.
means bounded subsets of have compact closure in ; is the canonical evolution embedding (Compactly embedded normed spaces, Banach evolution triples and weak time derivatives).
Hölder and Minkowski inequalities give and (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases, Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including ).
The Bochner space is complete (Bochner Lp is complete for a Banach value space).
The Axiom of Choice supplies Countable and Dependent Choice for sequential compactness and subsequence extraction (The Axiom of Choice, AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration, The Axiom of Countable Choice (), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain).
Proof
View each node in through the canonical embeddings , and let be their continuous affine interpolation. On its derivative equals . For and , the fundamental theorem for the affine function gives . Minkowski [F2] and translation invariance of the time integral yield .
If , write with . Then . Consequently, for , For , the same pointwise identity gives and hence . Combining the corresponding estimate at and with step 1.1 proves the stated translate bound in both cases.
Fix . By [F1], the image in of the unit ball has compact closure. Choose finitely many centers from that image forming an -net, let be their span, and let be the -orthogonal projection. Its best-approximation property gives for every . Choose an -orthonormal basis of . The scalar coefficients have weighted bounds from the bound, and their total variation satisfies At least one node value is no larger than its weighted average, so the total-variation bound gives a uniform bound for every nodal coefficient.
The affine scalar interpolants of these finitely many coefficients are uniformly bounded; their derivatives are the pairings of with , so their norms are uniformly bounded. Hölder gives a common modulus (or for ). Choose a finite time grid on which the modulus between adjacent points is at most , and finite -nets for the bounded coefficient vectors at each grid point. The piecewise-linear interpolants of the rounded grid values form a finite family within uniformly of every coefficient vector, so the projected affine family is totally bounded in . The maximum nodal jump is at most , so the projected piecewise-constant family differs from it uniformly by a quantity tending to zero. Thus is relatively compact in .
The projection remainder satisfies . Since is arbitrary, steps 3.1 and 4.1 show the full family is totally bounded in ; [A1] extracts a Cauchy subsequence, which converges by [F3]. This proves relative compactness.
If the nodal values are uniformly bounded by in , then . For , finite-measure Hölder upgrades the strong convergence to . For , , so the same subsequence is Cauchy in every finite and converges there by [F3]. These limits equal the strong limit since both convergences imply convergence in measure, whose limit is unique up to almost-everywhere equality.
Depends on
- Banach evolution triples and weak time derivatives
- Compactly embedded normed spaces
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including $p = \infty$
- Bochner Lp is complete for a Banach value space
- The Axiom of Choice
- AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration
Used by
- Energy and computed-state compactness for hybrid mimetic backward Euler Lemma
- Strong L2 compactness for weakly solenoidal MINI trajectories Lemma
- Conditional monotone finite-element convergence Theorem
- MINI backward Euler converges subsequentially to a solenoidal energy weak velocity Theorem
- One-dimensional mesh and time convergence of convex-splitting phase flows Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tomáš Roubíček, Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations with Applications, 2nd ed., Birkhäuser, 2005 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Christian Clason, Introduction to Finite Element Methods, lecture notes, arXiv:1709.08618v2 (standard reference, not scraped)