How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The motivic Hall algebra of a finite quiver
Definition
Let be a finite quiver over a field . A representation of assigns a finite-dimensional -vector space to each vertex and a linear map to each arrow . Its dimension vector is .
For put and let be the quotient Artin stack. It is finite type and has affine stabilizers: the representation variety and the acting group are finite type and affine, and each stabilizer is a closed subgroup of . For dimension vectors , let be the stack of short exact sequences of representationsThe endpoints are part of the data, and isomorphisms are isomorphisms of the whole exact sequence. Equivalently, after choosing the standard -dimensional subspaces at each vertex, this is the quotient by the product parabolic preserving those subspaces of the affine space of block upper-triangular arrow maps. Thus is a finite-type Artin stack with affine stabilizers. More explicitly, on a local splitting , the arrow has block matrixChanging the splitting by changes to . This is the translation action of the vector bundle on used in the extension stack calculation. Let send a sequence to its quotient, send it to its subrepresentation, and send it to its middle representation. The Hall correspondence is
& \mathfrak E_{\mathbf d,\mathbf e}(Q) \ar[dl,"(q,s)"'] \ar[dr,"m"] & \\ \mathfrak M_{\mathbf d}(Q)\times\mathfrak M_{\mathbf e}(Q) && \mathfrak M_{\mathbf d+\mathbf e}(Q)
Its arrows record the ordered quotient, subrepresentation, and middle object of the displayed short exact sequence; the diagram fixes the convolution convention. DefineFor and , define Thus the first factor is the quotient and the second factor is the subrepresentation, so the sequence is . Each homogeneous product is defined by one finite-type stack correspondence; no completion or finiteness of a sum over isomorphism classes is required. This is the stack-function product without a potential or a vanishing-cycle weight.
Depends on
Used by
- An untwisted monoid map fails for the one-arrow quiver Counterexample
- The Euler-twisted dimension-vector algebra of a quiver Definition
- The motivic Hall product for a one-vertex zero-arrow quiver Example
- The motive of a quiver extension stack Lemma
- Derived and cohomological Hall algebras are distinct constructions Remark
- Finite-quiver Hall counts and the limits of DT/BPS interpretation Remark
- Motivic stack Hall and untwisted finitary Hall have different carriers Remark
- Quiver motivic Hall convolution is associative and unital Theorem
- Quiver stack integration is multiplicative with the Euler twist Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Dominic Joyce, Configurations in abelian categories. II. Ringel-Hall algebras, arXiv:math/0503029v2, §5.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tom Bridgeland, An Introduction to Motivic Hall Algebras, arXiv:1002.4372v1, §§4.1–4.2 (standard reference, not scraped)