Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Quiver motivic Hall convolution is associative and unital

Statement

For a finite quiver Q over k, the convolution in The motivic Hall algebra of a finite quiver is an associative unital R-bilinear product on HQ. Its unit is the class of the zero-representation stack in degree 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite quiver Q and the stack-function Hall product whose first factor is the quotient and whose second factor is the subrepresentation.

[F1]

The product is pullback to the stack of short exact sequences followed by pushforward to the middle-object stack, with the endpoint order 0→B→E→A→0 (The motivic Hall algebra of a finite quiver).

[F2]

Pullback in the relative stack-function groups is fiber product, pushforward is composition, and both respect isomorphism and scissor relations (Relative motivic stack-function groups for quiver representation stacks).

[A1]

The Artin-stack convention carries the represented-sheaf descent use of AC specified in Algebraic stacks and their inertia stacks and The Axiom of Choice. The finite flag identifications below use only vertexwise kernels, quotients and preimages.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2A1

Let α,β,γ be homogeneous classes of degrees d,e,f. The iterated fiber products defining (α∗β)∗γ classify a representation E with a flag 0⊂F1⊂F2⊂E whose successive factors F1, F2/F1, and E/F2 have dimensions f,e,d. The maps to the three inputs are the same classes on these three factors.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

The iterated fiber products defining α∗(β∗γ) classify the same flags: first F2 is the subrepresentation of E with quotient of dimension d, then F1 is its subrepresentation with quotient of dimension e. For representations of a quiver, kernels, quotients and inverse images are computed vertexwise and inherit the arrow maps, so the two descriptions are inverse equivalences of the flag stacks.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Both parenthesizations therefore pull back the same exterior product of α,β,γ to the same three-step flag stack and push it forward along the same map sending a flag to its middle representation. Functoriality of pullback, pushforward and exterior product in [F2] gives (α∗β)∗γ=α∗(β∗γ). Bilinearity extends this identity from homogeneous classes to all of HQ.

4.1F1F2∎

If one factor is the zero representation, the exact sequence with zero subobject or zero quotient is uniquely isomorphic to the identity sequence on the other factor, including its endpoint automorphisms. Thus the degree-zero class acts as a two-sided unit.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources