How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Positive regression dependence on true-null coordinates (PRDS)
Definition
Let be a probability space, let , and let be a random vector whose coordinates are p-value statistics (Valid p-values). Fix a designated true-null index set . For , write for the law of under and define its support relative to by
Give each coordinate its trace Borel sigma-algebra (The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space) and give the finite product sigma-algebra (The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates). In this definition, “Borel set” means a member of that product sigma-algebra; thus “increasing measurable set” means coordinatewise increasing in this stated structure. The unit-interval lemma proves that with this trace Borel structure is standard Borel (The unit interval with its Borel structure is standard Borel). The finite-product result then makes with the specified product sigma-algebra a standard-Borel target (Standard Borel spaces, Finite products of standard Borel spaces are standard Borel); its finite-product proof uses only finite choice in ZF. Under the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), this target has a regular conditional distribution given , and the conditional-law factorization result supplies a kernel representing the conditional law of given (Existence of regular conditional distributions for standard borel targets, Regular conditional kernels factor through a standard borel conditioning variable, Conditional law given a random element).
The law of is positive regression dependent on the true-null coordinates (PRDS on ) if, for each , such a conditional-law version can be chosen so that for every coordinatewise increasing Borel set , the function
is nondecreasing on . If , this condition is vacuous. The monotonicity condition is a full conditional-law requirement; pairwise correlations alone do not verify it.
Remarks
The regular conditional law is a chosen version. PRDS requires the monotonicity on the stated support, including support points where a conditional version is not determined by an atom of positive mass. The companion examples include a finite counterexample showing that valid p-values can have positive pairwise covariance without satisfying PRDS. The BY source's one-sided Gaussian sufficient conditions do not imply a general guarantee for two-sided Gaussian tests; the PRDS theorem below applies only after its exact conditional monotonicity premise is established.
Depends on
- Valid p-values
- The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space
- The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates
- Standard Borel spaces
- The unit interval with its Borel structure is standard Borel
- Conditional law given a random element
- Finite products of standard Borel spaces are standard Borel
- Regular conditional kernels factor through a standard borel conditioning variable
- Existence of regular conditional distributions for standard borel targets
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
68 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Yoav Benjamini and Daniel Yekutieli, The Control of the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing under Dependency, The Annals of Statistics 29(4) (2001), Section 2.2 and Theorem 1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Yoav Benjamini, Discovering the False Discovery Rate, full 75-slide lecture, slides 33–35 (standard reference, not scraped)