Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Principal connections and vertical curvature

Definition

Assume ACω as recorded by The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), and let π:P→M be a smooth right principal G-bundle in the sense of Smooth principal G-bundle. The tangent bundle TP has the canonical smooth structure supplied by Assuming countable choice, the tangent bundle has a canonical smooth 2n-manifold structure. Its vertical subbundle is VP:=ker⁡(dπ)⊆TP. In each principal chart U×G, this is the tangent bundle in the G factor, so it is a smooth vector subbundle of TP in the sense of Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles.

A principal connection on P is a smooth vector subbundle H⊆TP such that TpP=VpP⊕Hp for every p∈P and d(Rg)p(Hp)=Hpg(p∈P, g∈G), where Rg(p)=pg is the principal right action. Thus H is a smoothly varying horizontal complement to the vertical tangent directions, invariant under the structure-group action. This definition is conditional on a specified H; it is not an existence theorem for connections on every bundle.

Let h:TP→H and v:TP→VP be the projections given by this direct-sum decomposition. For smooth vector fields X,Y on P, define the vertical-valued curvature by KH(X,Y):=−v([hX,hY]), where the vector-field bracket is the commutator The Lie bracket of smooth vector fields. The bracket definition gives the commutator on functions; Smooth vector fields form a Lie algebra under the Lie bracket proves that it is again a smooth vector field. In a local frame adapted to the smooth splitting TP=VP⊕H, the projections h and v are smooth. Therefore v([hX,hY]) is a smooth vertical vector field whenever X,Y are smooth. This formula is tensorial in X,Y: for a smooth function f, v([fhX,hY])=f v([hX,hY])−hY(f) v(hX)=f v([hX,hY]), because v(hX)=0, and the same calculation in the second input gives v([hX,fhY])=f v([hX,hY]), since v(hY)=0. It is alternating because the bracket is alternating. To see the induced bundle map is smooth, choose local smooth frames E1,…,En of TP and F1,…,Fr of VP. Tensoriality gives, for X=∑ifiEi and Y=∑jgjEj, KH(X,Y)=∑i,jfigjKH(Ei,Ej). Each KH(Ei,Ej) is a smooth section of VP, so its components in the Fa frame are smooth; the displayed formula therefore has smooth local coefficient functions. Thus the formula defines a smooth alternating bundle map TP×PTP→VP, independent of the local vector-field extensions representing the tangent vectors.

This item uses the vertical-valued convention. It does not identify VP with a Lie-algebra-valued form or assert a Maurer–Cartan formula. Its axiom base contains ACω exactly through the canonical tangent-bundle and vector-field suppliers above; the displayed splitting and curvature formula themselves select no objects from a family.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources