Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The residue pairing of a line bundle with the dual canonical twist

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the residue suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). Let C be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over a perfect field k, and let L be an invertible OC-module with dual L−1 (Invertible sheaves). Write ωC=ΩC/k1 for the canonical bundle (Canonical bundle and canonical divisors) and Lη/L for the sheaf of principal parts of L (Principal parts of an invertible sheaf on a curve). Tensoring with the dual gives the invertible sheaf ωC⊗L−1 (Tensor product of sheaves of modules, The internal Hom sheaf of two module sheaves).

Local pairing. Let cp∈Lη/Lp be a local principal part of L at a closed point p, and let s∈(ωC⊗L−1)p be a regular local section of the dual twist. Their product is a rational differential, defined modulo regular differentials at p: if cp is represented by c~p∈Lη, then c~ps is a rational differential. Replacing c~p by another representative changes it by an element of Lp, whose product with s is in ωC,p and is regular. Thus the local residue res⁡p(cps) of Residue of a rational differential at a separable closed point is independent of the representative of cp. In a local trivialization with parameter t, this is the residue of the Laurent expansion of c~ps; only its t−1dt coefficient is used.

The pairing. Let c=(cp) be a finite-support family of local principal parts of L; such families represent the classes of H1(C,L), namely H1(C,L) is the cokernel of the diagonal map Lη→⨁pLη/Lp (H^1 of a line bundle on a curve as principal parts modulo meromorphic and regular sections). Let s be a global section of ωC⊗L−1. Define ⟨c,s⟩:=∑pres⁡p(cp s)∈k. The sum is finite: cp=0 for all but finitely many p by finite support, and therefore res⁡p(cps)=0 for all but finitely many p; a global section s is regular at every closed point, so no further poles appear. The construction is k-linear in the family c and in the section s, by the k-linearity of the local residue and of the tensor product.

This defines the residue pairing on pairs of representatives, ⟨  ,  ⟩ ⁣:(finite-support families in ⨁pLη/Lp)×H0(C,ωC⊗L−1)⟶k. It is independent of the chosen representative of the principal-part family: a new representative differs by the principal parts of a global meromorphic section of L and by a family of local regular sections, and the independence is the descent statement proved in the next item of this development, which yields the induced k-bilinear pairing H1(C,L)×H0(C,ωC⊗L−1)→k.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

79 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources