How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A nonzero global dual section detects a cohomology class
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the residue suppliers. Let be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over a perfect field and let be an invertible -module. Then the -linear map given by the residue pairing of The residue pairing of a line bundle with the dual canonical twist is injective: every nonzero global section of detects some class in . If, in addition, the two spaces are known to be finite-dimensional of equal dimension (the dimension balance established separately in this development), then is an isomorphism. Under that additional hypothesis the residue pairing is perfect: the annihilator in of all global dual sections is zero. By the principal-parts presentation, any finite-support representative of such a class then lies in the diagonal image of a global meromorphic section of , including zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a perfect field ; a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over , so that is a nonempty irreducible finite-type -scheme of chain dimension (in the sense of Chain dimension and the empty-space convention) with generic point , every closed point of has a finite residue field, and every nonempty open subset of contains ; an invertible -module ; and a global section .
The sheaf of meromorphic sections of is the constant sheaf with value the one-dimensional -vector space , ; the stalk of the sheaf of principal parts at a closed point is , and is the space of finite-support families of local principal parts. For an invertible sheaf on the integral curve, its map into the generic fibre is locally in a frame and is injective. Thus a nonzero global section of has a nonzero generic germ and a nonzero germ at every closed point. The principal-parts descriptions are supplied by Principal parts of an invertible sheaf on a curve (Invertible sheaves).
The cohomology space is the cokernel of the diagonal map ; for a finite-support family and a global section the sum is finite, depends only on the class of in , and the induced residue pairing is -bilinear (H^1 of a line bundle on a curve as principal parts modulo meromorphic and regular sections, The residue pairing of a line bundle with the dual canonical twist, The residue pairing is well defined on cohomology).
At a closed point with finite separable over , a rational differential written as with a uniformizer and has residue , the field trace of the coefficient of in the Laurent expansion (Residue of a rational differential at a separable closed point).
The local ring is a discrete valuation ring with uniformizer , maximal ideal , every nonzero element of it is a unit times a power of , and the residue map is surjective with kernel (Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings). For every nonzero rational function , Every nonzero fraction is a unit times a power of a uniformiser gives the unique expression with and ; in particular, when is regular and nonzero, and is a unit.
The canonical bundle is invertible. At each closed point , the perfect-field hypothesis makes finite separable, so is a basis of for a uniformizer ; every rational differential has the form for a unique . The local basis assertion is supplied by A uniformizer differential generates the module of differentials, and invertibility by Canonical bundle and canonical divisors.
If is perfect then every algebraic extension of is separable, so a finite residue field extension is separable, and then the trace form is nondegenerate; the trace is -linear (Every algebraic extension of a perfect field is separable, The trace form of a finite extension is nondegenerate exactly when the extension is separable, The norm and trace of a finite field extension).
The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice.
The underlying space of is Noetherian: the finite-type affine-cover argument in Proper closed subsets of a curve are finite establishes this for the present integral finite-type scheme under Choice. For a Noetherian space, chain dimension is the supremum of the lengths of strict chains of nonempty irreducible closed subsets (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention). Since has chain dimension , there is a strict chain of nonempty irreducible closed subsets of .
Under the Axiom of Choice, every proper closed subset of an integral finite-type -scheme of chain dimension is a finite set of closed points (Proper closed subsets of a curve are finite). The hypotheses hold for .
Proof
(Nonzero generic and closed-point germs.) Put . If a nonzero global section had zero generic germ, then on each affine trivializing open its regular coefficient in the domain would map to zero in , forcing it to vanish; thus . For any closed , take an affine trivialization and write ; since contains , maps to , so , and the localization map is injective, hence .
Since has chain dimension one, [F8] gives a strict chain of nonempty irreducible closed subsets. In particular, is a nonempty proper closed subset of . By [F9], it is a finite set of closed points; choose . Thus has a closed point.
(Local coefficient before its order.) Choose a uniformizer and a frame . Since is perfect, is finite separable and [F5] gives ; by step 1.1 write with . Now define and , whose residue is nonzero.
The residue field is finite over and separable because is perfect, so [F6] makes its trace form nondegenerate; since , choose with .
Lift to a unit using the surjection with kernel , and define , with for . Its coefficient has valuation , so this is a nonzero principal part; by [F2] the finite-support family represents a class .
Since is supported at , ; using gives . The regular unit has constant term , so the coefficient of in the full coefficient is ; hence the coefficient-trace formula yields .
By step 5.1 every nonzero gives a class with , so the functional is nonzero; the -bilinear pairing of [F2] therefore defines an injective linear map .
If both spaces are finite-dimensional and have equal dimension, the injective is an isomorphism; the pairing is then perfect, and a class in annihilated by every global dual section is zero. By [F2], a finite-support representative of the zero class lies in the diagonal image of a global meromorphic section of , including zero.
Depends on
- Every algebraic extension of a perfect field is separable
- The Axiom of Choice
- Canonical bundle and canonical divisors
- Chain dimension and the empty-space convention
- The norm $N_{K/F}$ and trace $\operatorname{Tr}_{K/F}$ of a finite field extension
- Invertible sheaves
- Principal parts of an invertible sheaf on a curve
- The residue pairing of a line bundle with the dual canonical twist
- Residue of a rational differential at a separable closed point
- Proper closed subsets of a curve are finite
- H^1 of a line bundle on a curve as principal parts modulo meromorphic and regular sections
- The residue pairing is well defined on cohomology
- A uniformizer differential generates the module of differentials
- Every nonzero fraction is a unit times a power of a uniformiser
- Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings
- The trace form of a finite extension is nondegenerate exactly when the extension is separable
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
109 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Tate, Residues of differentials on curves, Ann. Sci. E.N.S. (4) 1 (1968) 149-159 (standard reference, not scraped)
- MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry (Fall 2015) course notes, Lectures 24-25 (standard reference, not scraped)