Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The two sides of the residue pairing have the same dimension

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the duality suppliers. Let C be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over a perfect field k and let L be an invertible sheaf on C. Then dim⁡kH1(C,L)=dim⁡kH0(C,ωC⊗L−1); both spaces are finite-dimensional and the equality is the numerical form of Serre duality for L, obtained from the published duality theorem for smooth projective varieties after Every smooth proper curve admits a projective embedding makes C projective. Combined with A nonzero global dual section detects a cohomology class this shows that the residue pairing of The residue pairing of a line bundle with the dual canonical twist is a perfect pairing over perfect k.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice; a perfect field k; a smooth proper geometrically integral curve C over k; and an invertible OC-module L.

[F1]

The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

[F2]

ωC=ΩC/k1 is the canonical bundle, an invertible OC-module; and C is a smooth curve over k, so it is a k-scheme of finite type whose underlying space has chain dimension one, with smooth structure morphism, and it is proper over k (Canonical bundle and canonical divisors, Invertible sheaves).

[F3]

An invertible OX-module L is locally free of rank one; its dual L∨=HomOX(L,OX) is again invertible of rank one, and L∨⊗OXL is canonically OX. The sheaf L−1 is the dual L∨, and the tensor product of OX-modules is the sheafification of the componentwise tensor presheaf (Invertible sheaves, Locally free sheaves of finite rank, Tensor product of sheaves of modules).

[F4]

The residue pairing ⟨−,−⟩ ⁣:H1(C,L)×H0(C,ωC⊗L−1)→k of The residue pairing of a line bundle with the dual canonical twist is k-bilinear, and the induced k-linear map Φ ⁣:H0(C,ωC⊗L−1)→H1(C,L)∗, s↦(c↦⟨c,s⟩), is injective; equivalently, whenever the two sides are finite-dimensional of equal dimension, Φ is an isomorphism (A nonzero global dual section detects a cohomology class).

[F5]

Let X be a smooth projective k-scheme of pure dimension n and let E be a finite locally free OX-module. With ωX=⋀nΩX/k1 there is a normalized trace tX ⁣:Hn(X,ωX)→k, independent of a projective embedding, such that for every 0≤q≤n the cup product, contraction and trace give a functorial perfect pairing of finite-dimensional k-vector spaces Hq(X,E)×Hn−q(X,E∨⊗ωX)⟶Hn(X,ωX)→tXk; outside 0≤q≤n the relevant cohomology groups vanish (Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety).

[F6]

Every smooth proper geometrically integral curve C over a field k admits a closed immersion i ⁣:C→PkN over k; equivalently the structure morphism C→Spec⁡k is projective in the H-projective convention (Every smooth proper curve admits a projective embedding).

Proof

Proof technique: direct; apply the published smooth-projective duality theorem to the curve and the rank-one module L in degree q=1, and combine injectivity with equal finite dimensions.

1.1F2F5F6

By [F6] the curve C is projective over k, and it is smooth over k with underlying space of dimension one, so X=C satisfies the hypotheses of the duality theorem [F5] with pure dimension n=1; moreover ωC=⋀1ΩC/k1 agrees with the canonical bundle of [F2].

1.2F3

The invertible sheaf L is locally free of rank one, hence a finite locally free OC-module of rank r=1 as required for the module E=L in [F5].

2.1F5step 1.1step 1.2

Apply the duality theorem [F5] to X=C, n=1, E=L and q=1: the cup product, contraction and normalized trace tC ⁣:H1(C,ωC)→k give a perfect k-bilinear pairing H1(C,L)×H0(C,L∨⊗ωC)⟶H1(C,ωC)→tCk, and both k-vector spaces are finite-dimensional; perfectness makes the induced map to the dual an isomorphism, so their k-dimensions are equal.

3.1F3step 2.1

The dual L∨ is the inverse L−1 of L in the Picard group of invertible sheaves, so the invertible sheaves L∨⊗ωC and ωC⊗L−1 are canonically isomorphic; consequently their spaces of global sections are k-linearly isomorphic.

4.1F5step 2.1step 3.1

Combining steps 2.1 and 3.1, dim⁡kH1(C,L)=dim⁡kH0(C,ωC⊗L−1), both spaces finite-dimensional: this is the numerical form of Serre duality for the invertible sheaf L on the curve.

5.1F1F4step 4.1∎

The map Φ ⁣:H0(C,ωC⊗L−1)→H1(C,L)∗ induced by the residue pairing is k-linear and injective by [F4], and step 4.1 exhibits its source and target as finite-dimensional k-vector spaces of the same dimension; an injective linear map between such spaces is an isomorphism, hence every nonzero class in H1(C,L) is detected by a global section and the residue pairing is perfect. The only choice-theoretic input is the Axiom of Choice inherited through the duality and residue suppliers [F1].

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

74 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources