Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Spectral multiplicity function in the separable case

Definition

Assume AC. Let T be a bounded normal operator on a nonzero separable complex Hilbert space H (Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset) with spectral projection valued measure E on σ(T) and spectral measure class to be described below.

Step 1: a countable cyclic decomposition. By the multiplication-operator form of the spectral theorem applied to a dense sequence, fix once and for all a finite or countable family (xj)j∈J of nonzero vectors with H=⨁j∈JHxj,μj:=Exj=⟨E(⋅)xj,xj⟩, where Hxj is the cyclic subspace of xj and each μj is a nonzero finite positive regular Borel measure on σ(T) (Multiplication operator form of the bounded normal spectral theorem, Cyclic vector and cyclic normal operator, Scalar and complex measures from a pvm). The index set J is a finite or countable subset of N, listed in increasing order, and summands with xj=0 are omitted.

Step 2: a common dominating measure. Put μ:=∑j∈J2−j1+μj(σ(T)) μj. Then μ is a finite positive regular Borel measure with μj≪μ for every j; let hj:=dμjdμ,Fj:={z∈σ(T):hj(z)>0} be the Radon–Nikodym derivative and its positivity set (A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density).

Step 3: the multiplicity function. Define the multiplicity function of the decomposition by m(z):=∑j∈J1Fj(z)∈{0,1,2,… }∪{∞}(z∈σ(T)). It is a Borel function, and z↦m(z) is the fiber dimension function of the model below. The set S(z):={j∈J:z∈Fj} of active coordinates has cardinality m(z), and for r≥1 the r-th active coordinate is kr(z):=min⁡{k∈J: #(S(z)∩{j∈J:j≤k})=r},z∈Ar:={z:m(z)≥r}, a Borel function on the Borel set Ar; the sets A1⊇A2⊇⋯ are decreasing and ⋃rAr is μ-conull.

Step 4: the standard measurable-field model. The standard model of the decomposition is the space L2(σ(T),μ,m):={f=(fr)r≥1: fr Borel, fr=0 μ-a.e. on {m<r}, ∑r≥1∫∣fr∣2 dμ<∞} of measurable fields with componentwise operations and inner product ⟨f,g⟩=∑r∫frgr‾ dμ (A measurable function between measurable spaces, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions), where fields are identified when they agree μ-almost everywhere in every component. Its fiber at z is span⁡‾{er:1≤r≤m(z)}⊆ℓ2(N), so the fiber dimension is exactly m(z), and the model is the direct sum ⨁r≥1L2(μ∣Ar) of the ordinary L2-spaces of the restrictions of μ to the decreasing sets Ar (Hilbert space).

Claim of the definition (identification with the operator model). The rank enumeration of active coordinates together with the Radon–Nikodym derivatives identifies the standard model unitarily with the orthogonal sum of the cyclic L2-summands: the map W:L2(σ(T),μ,m)⟶⨁j∈JL2(σ(T),μj),(Wf)j(z):=fr(z,j)(z)hj(z)  for z∈Fj,(Wf)j:=0  off Fj, where r(z,j) is the rank of j in S(z), is a well-defined unitary operator intertwining the multiplications by every bounded Borel function and, in particular, intertwining Mz with Mz.

Well-definedness. (1) μ is finite and nonzero and μj≪μ for each j, since the j-th summand of the sum dominates 2−j1+μj(σ(T))μj. It is regular: for any Borel A and ε>0, choose a finite initial segment of J whose weighted measure tail has total mass below ε/2. For each measure in that segment, choose a compact subset of A approximating A from inside, or an open superset approximating it from outside, with weighted error summing to less than ε/2. The finite union of the compact subsets lies in A and the finite intersection of the open supersets contains A; each approximates μ(A) within ε because the discarded tail has total mass below ε/2. (2) hj exists, is nonnegative μ-almost everywhere and is unique up to μ-null sets (Radon–Nikodym); Fj={hj>0} is Borel and μj(σ(T)∖Fj)=∫{hj=0}hj dμ=0. (3) ⋃jFj is μ-conull: since hj=0 off Fj one has μj(σ(T)∖⋃jFj)=∫σ(T)∖⋃jFjhj dμ=0 for every j, so the dominating sum vanishes there, and therefore m≥1 μ-almost everywhere. (4) m is Borel as a countable sum of indicators, and kr is Borel on Ar because {kr=k}=Fk∩{∑ℓ<k,ℓ∈J1Fℓ=r−1} is a Borel set. (5) L2(σ(T),μ,m) is a Hilbert space: it is the orthogonal direct sum ⨁rL2(μ∣Ar), whose components are complete by Riesz– Fischer. If (f(n)) is Cauchy in the direct sum, each component converges in L2(μ∣Ar) to some fr. The finite partial sums of ∥fr∥22 are bounded by the squared norms of the Cauchy sequence, so (fr) has finite direct-sum norm. Given ε>0, choose n0 such that ∥f(n)−f(q)∥≤ε for n,q≥n0; for fixed n≥n0, pass q→∞ in each finite coordinate sum and then take the supremum over those sums to get ∥f(n)−f∥≤ε. Thus the direct sum is complete (Riesz-Fischer completeness of Lp for 1≤p≤∞). (6) W is well defined: (Wf)j is Borel because on each Borel set {r(z,j)=r} it equals fr/hj with hj>0 there, it vanishes off Fj, and it is μj-square-integrable because ∑j∈J∫∣(Wf)j∣2dμj=∑j∈J∫Fj∣fr(z,j)∣2 dμ=∑r≥1∫Ar∣fr∣2 dμ=∥f∥2<+∞, using the positive-measure identity μj=hj dμ and the nonnegative change-of-density integral (Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product); the same display shows W is isometric, and W is onto with inverse (gj)j↦f, fr(z):=gkr(z)(z)hkr(z)(z) on Ar and fr:=0 otherwise, which is Borel by the same rank-measurability and is square-integrable by the same computation; multiplicativity is componentwise and gives WMφ=MφW for every bounded Borel φ, hence WMz=MzW. (7) At this stage the data (μ,hj,Fj,m) come from the chosen decomposition; independence of the measure class and almost-everywhere multiplicity is established later, after the intertwiner lemma. For this decomposition the multiplicity function is the fiber dimension z↦dim⁡Hz of the model, equal to m(z); at a non-atomic point of σ(T) with respect to E it is not the dimension of the eigenspace ker⁡(T−zI), which is the fiber of the atoms carried by E({z}).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

64 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources