Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The deformed category O family over the Cartan symmetric algebra

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the published block theory (The Axiom of Choice). Let S=S(h) be the symmetric algebra of the Cartan subalgebra of The classical BGG category O, graded by deg⁡h=2 as fixed on this page (Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts, Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration). Let b=h⊕n+ act on S⊗Cλ by x⋅(s⊗1)=xs⊗1+λ(x)s⊗1(x∈h),x⋅(s⊗1)=0(x∈n+), where for x∈h, xs means multiplication by the linear polynomial x∈S(h); n+ acts trivially. Put MS(λ):=U(g)⊗U(b)(S⊗Cλ), a module over g⊗S: the left g-action is induced, and S acts on the right by multiplication on the last factor, which commutes with g. Specializing at a closed point ϵ of Spec⁡S gives MS(λ)⊗SCϵ≅M(λ+ϵ), the Verma module of Verma modules; this is the universal family of Verma modules with deformation parameter ϵ.

The family. For a localization T of S put MT(λ):=MS(λ)⊗ST, and let DT(λ) be the full subcategory of g⊗T-modules that are direct summands of a finite direct sum of modules E⊗MT(λ) for finite-dimensional g-modules E. Write DR(λ) for R=S(0), the localization of S at the origin of Spec⁡S. The deformed family is the assignment T↦DT(λ) together with the specialization functors −⊗Tκ(p) at closed points p of Spec⁡T, where κ(p)=T/p is the residue field. The image of the tautological map h→T→κ(p) is the parameter ϵp, and MT(λ)⊗Tκ(p) is the Verma module over κ(p) with highest weight λ+ϵp for g⊗Cκ(p). For a complex-valued point ϵ:T→C, this is precisely −⊗TCϵ and the ordinary complex Verma module M(λ+ϵ). An arbitrary localization can have closed points whose residue fields are larger than C; for example, T=C(t) has only the residue field C(t) and has no complex-valued point. By the tensor identity for finite-dimensional modules and the Verma flags of tensor products (Finite-dimensional tensoring preserves Verma flags) the specializations have Verma constituents over their residue fields of highest weights λ+ν+ϵp, where ν runs through the weights of the finite-dimensional tensor factors. At complex-valued points they can meet several central-character blocks, whose labels are the dot-Weyl orbits through these highest weights (Central characters are dot-Weyl orbits); a generic parameter is generally nonintegral, and the distinct constituent labels have distinct central characters at the generic parameter: an equality λ+γ+τ+ρ=w(λ+γ′+τ+ρ) as affine functions of τ forces w=1 by comparing linear parts, and then γ=γ′ (Central characters are dot-Weyl orbits).

Selected components. For a regular dominant integral source λ as in The regular integral block and its antidominant weight and a dot-dominant integral target ν, so that ν+ρ lies in the closed positive chamber, denote by DR[ν](λ) the component of DR(λ) whose closed fiber at the origin lies in the selected target block Oν of Translation functors by tensoring and projection. Finite Verma flags of the deformed tensor products and pairwise-unit resultants of their central-character polynomials define this component by actual central idempotents over R, obtained from Chinese remainder theorem for pairwise comaximal ideals. Indeed choose a linear combination z of central elements separating the finitely many distinct special characters. On each deformed Verma factor, z acts by a polynomial ci(τ) by The Harish-Chandra projection computes the highest-weight scalar, and a flag is annihilated by ∏i(z−ci(τ)). Group these factors by their constant values at the origin; differences from different groups are units in R, so their product polynomials are comaximal in R[X]. CRT gives mutually orthogonal polynomial projectors, whose images are the selected components and whose sum is the identity. Other central-character components remain part of the full tensor family; thus whole-family statements and selected-block statements are distinguished.

Weight structure. Write τ:h→T for the tautological linear map. Modules in DT(λ) carry a deformed weight decomposition X=⨁ξXξ, where Xξ={m:(h−τ(h))m=ξ(h)m for every h∈h}. These are eigenmodules for h−τ(h), not ordinary complex weight spaces for h. They are finite projective, hence locally free of finite rank over T, as follows from the PBW model of Verma modules and the flatness of the localization (PBW gives an ordered monomial basis for the enveloping algebra). The conventions are those of [Soe90, Section 2.1]; no choice beyond the inherited Axiom of Choice of the block theory is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources