Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The harmonic complement of the coinvariant algebra

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the published invariant-theory items. Let W act on the Cartan space h by reflections and on S=S(h) by graded algebra automorphisms, with coinvariant algebra C=S/I as in The coinvariant algebra of a finite Weyl group. Then there is a W-stable graded subspace H⊆S, finite dimensional of dimension ∣W∣, such that the multiplication map SW⊗CH⟶S,p⊗h↦ph, is an isomorphism of graded SW-modules and of W-modules, and the restriction of the quotient map ρ:S→C to H is an isomorphism of graded W-modules H→ ∼ C. One may take H={f∈S:∂pf=0 for all p∈S+W}, using constant-coefficient differential operators from a W-invariant positive definite form on hR. Any W-stable graded complement of I has the same multiplication and quotient properties. This is the simultaneous kernel of all positive-degree invariant differential operators, not in general the kernel of the quadratic Laplacian alone. In particular dim⁡Hd=dim⁡Cd for every d and ∑ddim⁡Hd=∣W∣.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite Weyl reflection group W of rank r acting on the real Cartan space hR and on S=C[h] (page degrees, deg⁡h=2), its invariant algebra SW, the ideal I=S S+W with basic invariants w1,…,wr, and the coinvariant algebra C=S/I with quotient map ρ.

[F1]

Under AC, SW=C[w1,…,wr] is a polynomial algebra on homogeneous basic invariants of page degrees 2di>0, and S is a free graded SW-module of rank ∣W∣ (Chevalley shephard todd for finite weyl groups, The Axiom of Choice).

[F2]

I=S S+W is the ideal generated by the basic invariants, C=S/I is a commutative graded C-algebra with C0=C generated in degree two, ρ is surjective with kernel I, and Hilb⁡(C,t)=∏i(1+t2+⋯+t2(di−1)), dim⁡CC=∏idi=∣W∣; the wi are minimal homogeneous invariant generators, equivalently a homogeneous S-regular sequence realizing I (The coinvariant algebra of a finite Weyl group, Weyl coinvariant hilbert series has order w dimension, Reflection basic invariants form a regular sequence).

[F3]

Every symmetric bilinear form on a finite-dimensional vector space has an orthogonal basis, and positivity is preserved under the constructions used below (Bilinear forms, and symmetric, skew-symmetric, and alternating bilinear forms, Every symmetric bilinear form on a finite-dimensional space over a field of characteristic not 2 has an orthogonal basis).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F3construct

Choose an arbitrary positive definite symmetric bilinear form on hR and average it over the finite group W, obtaining a W-invariant positive definite form ( , ); choose an orthonormal basis e1,…,er of hR for it. On the symmetric algebra S=C[e1,…,er] let ⟨ , ⟩ be the Fischer pairing, the sesquilinear form with ⟨eα,eβ⟩=α! δαβ on monomials eα (α a multi-index); it is positive definite, and W acts on S by orthogonal transformations for it because the form on hR is W-invariant. For p∈S let ∂p=p(∂1,…,∂r) be substitution of the partial derivatives ∂i=∂/∂ei; then multiplication by p has adjoint ∂p‾, i.e. ⟨pf,g⟩=⟨f,∂p‾g⟩, as checked on monomials. Choose real basic invariants: real and imaginary parts of complex invariants are invariant, and one may choose a real homogeneous basis of the indecomposables of the invariant algebra and lift it; its complexification gives basic generators. Complex conjugation preserves S+W, so simultaneous kernels are unchanged. Set Hd:=Id⊥ inside the finite-dimensional space Sd, and H:=⨁dHd.

1.2F1F2algebra

The invariant ring acts on S with the expected Hilbert series: S has a finite homogeneous SW-basis by [F1], say of degrees m1,…,m∣W∣; their images in S/S+WS=C form a C-basis by graded Nakayama, so ∑jtmj=Hilb⁡(C,t) and therefore Hilb⁡(S,t)=Hilb⁡(SW,t)Hilb⁡(C,t).

2.1step 1.1algebra

By step 1.1 the spaces Sd=Id⊕Hd are orthogonal direct sums and H is a graded subspace; it is W-stable because W preserves the form and I is a W-stable homogeneous ideal, and H is a graded complement of I. Moreover Hd={f∈Sd:∂pf=0 for all p∈S+W}: since I=(w1,…,wr), one has f∈Id⊥ exactly when ⟨f,wig⟩=0 for every i and every g∈Sd−2di, which by adjointness is ⟨∂wif,g⟩=0 for all such g, hence ∂wif=0 by positive definiteness; and for p=∑iqiwi one has ∂p=∑i∂qi∂wi, so vanishing for the wi is vanishing for all of S+W.

2.2F2step 1.1

The restriction ρ∣H:H→C is an isomorphism of graded vector spaces because ρ has kernel I and H is a complement of I by step 1.1; it is a map of W-modules because ρ is W-equivariant. Hence dim⁡Hd=dim⁡Cd for every d, and dim⁡H=dim⁡C=∣W∣ by [F2].

3.1step 2.1step 2.2

Let φ:SW⊗H→S, p⊗h↦ph. This is a homomorphism of graded SW-modules and of W-modules. Its reduction modulo S+W, namely H→C, h↦ρ(h), is surjective because it is the isomorphism ρ∣H of step 2.2.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra

The map φ is surjective: given homogeneous f∈Sd, choose h∈Hd with ρ(f)=ρ(h) by step 3.1; then f−h∈Id=∑i(wiS)d=∑iwiSd−2di, so by induction on d each wig with g∈Sd−2di lies in SW⋅H, and adding h exhibits f in the image.

5.1step 1.2step 2.2step 4.1algebra

The map φ is injective: by steps 1.2 and 2.2 the two sides have the same Hilbert series, Hilb⁡(SW⊗H,t)=Hilb⁡(SW,t)Hilb⁡(H,t)=Hilb⁡(SW,t)Hilb⁡(C,t)=Hilb⁡(S,t), both are graded with finite-dimensional graded pieces, and by step 4.1 the kernel of the surjective graded SW-linear map φ would otherwise contribute positive Hilbert series. Hence φ is an isomorphism.

6.1F1F2step 2.1step 2.2step 5.1∎

Steps 2.1, 2.2 and 5.1 give a W-stable graded complement H of I with ρ∣H:H≅C and SW⊗H≅S; the description of H as the simultaneous invariant differential kernel follows from the adjointness ⟨pf,g⟩=⟨f,∂p‾g⟩ of step 1.1, and dim⁡H=∣W∣ by step 2.2. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the invariant-theory suppliers [F1] and [F2]; the construction itself uses only finite averages and finite-dimensional linear algebra.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources