Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Locally finite dg enhancements for derived Hall theory

Definition

Fix a finite field k=Fq (Finite fields and their order). Its field operations make it a commutative ring with unit by Every field is a commutative ring with 1≠0; it is an integral domain, and it is a commutative division ring; this is the base ring for all DGA and dg-module structures below. A small k-linear dg-category T has a set of objects, a cochain complex T(a,b) of k-vector spaces for every ordered pair, closed degree-zero identity maps, and associative degree-zero composition chain maps T(b,c)⊗kT(a,b)⟶T(a,c). The cohomological grading and differential follow Cochain complex in an abelian category. For cochain complexes U,V use the direct-sum total tensor complex (U⊗kV)n=⨁p+q=nUp⊗kVq,dU⊗V(f⊗g)=dUf⊗g+(−1)pf⊗dVg(f∈Up, g∈Vq). The formula is k-balanced and additive because the two differentials are k-linear; extend it linearly from homogeneous tensors. It has degree +1 and squares to zero: on f⊗g its two mixed terms have coefficients (−1)p+1 and (−1)p, which cancel, and the remaining terms contain dU2f or dV2g. Every element has finite support in the displayed direct sum, so this construction imposes no boundedness on U,V.

Writing fg=f∘g for f∈T(b,c)p and g∈T(a,b)q, the requirement that composition commute with these differentials says exactly d(fg)=(df)g+(−1)pf(dg). Thus each endomorphism complex is a cohomological DGA in the sense of Cohomological differential graded algebra: its multiplication is associative, unital and k-bilinear by the dg-category axioms, the scalar map is λ↦λ1a and is central since (λ1a)f=λf=f(λ1a), and the displayed formula is precisely the DGA Leibniz rule. The identity has degree zero and is closed, as required above.

The dg-category is locally finite when, for every a,b, the graded vector space ⨁i∈ZHi(T(a,b)) is finite-dimensional. Thus the cohomology is finite-dimensional and vanishes outside a finite set of degrees; no uniform bound over all pairs is assumed.

A right dg T-module is a dg-functor Top→Ch(k): it assigns a cochain complex M(a) to each object and compatible degree-zero right composition actions. Explicitly, the right action is a degree-zero chain map M(b)⊗kT(a,b)⟶M(a),m⊗f⟼mf, with the tensor differential just fixed. For homogeneous m∈M(b)q and f∈T(a,b)p, its chain-map identity is dM(mf)=dM(m)f+(−1)qm dT(f). The actions are unital and compatible with composition. In particular, on each endomorphism algebra T(a,a) they give exactly the right differential graded module structure of Cohomological left and right differential graded modules, with the sign determined by the degree of m, not of f. No left action or ungraded identification with a left module is inferred. For hb=T(−,b) the action is composition, so the composition identity above verifies this same right-module differential rule. A quasi-isomorphism is a module map inducing an isomorphism on every cohomology group at every object.

The enhancement used here includes the standard projective model category of right dg modules (Model categories and Quillen adjunctions): its weak equivalences are the quasi-isomorphisms just defined, its fibrations are objectwise degreewise surjections, and its representable modules are homotopically projective, so their dg Hom complexes compute derived Hom. Its homotopy category D(T) is triangulated. The same objectwise homotopy theory is used for arrow diagrams and composable-pair diagrams. It is stable: it is pointed, and a square is a homotopy pushout exactly when it is a homotopy pullback. The translation is the cohomological shift, and a homotopy cofiber of a module map is represented functorially by its mapping cone. These homotopy-theory structures are part of the supplied dg enhancement; an unenhanced triangulated category alone is not an input.

For modules a,b, write RHomT(a,b) for the derived Hom complex in the supplied projective homotopy theory. Its derived mapping space has πjMap⁡(a,b)=H−jRHomT(a,b)=Ext⁡T−j(a,b) for j≥0. In the core homotopy type of a category of modules, π1 at a is Aut⁡(a) and πi=Ext⁡T1−i(a,a) for i>1.

For a∈T, the representable right module is ha=T(−,a). A module is perfect if its object in D(T) belongs to the smallest full triangulated subcategory containing all representables and closed under retracts. This means it is obtained from finitely many representables by finite direct sums, shifts, cones, and direct summands. For perfect modules set Ext⁡Ti(x,y):=Hom⁡D(T)(x,y[i]).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources