How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Quadratic trust-region models and the actual-to-predicted reduction ratio
Definition
Let , let be differentiable at , and put using the gradient convention of The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case. Let be a symmetric matrix and let . A quadratic model at is
with the Euclidean inner product and norm of The Euclidean inner product on and matrix products as in Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix , including zero-sized shapes. The trust-region ball is . The predicted reduction of a feasible step is . Its actual reduction is . When , the actual-to-predicted reduction ratio is
The quantity means the matrix norm induced by the Euclidean vector norm, namely the case of The matrix norm induced by a published vector p-norm. It is not required that in this definition; exact Hessians and symmetric model approximations are both admitted. The ratio is undefined when predicted reduction is nonpositive, so an algorithm must use a separately justified fallback or return a failure status in that case.
Depends on
- The Euclidean inner product $\langle x,y\rangle = \sum_{k<n} x_k y_k$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$
- The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case
- The Hessian matrix and critical points of a scalar field
- The matrix norm induced by a published vector p-norm
- Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix $I_n$, including zero-sized shapes
Used by
- A finite-budget trust-region method with ratio-based radius updates Algorithm
- Dogleg steps for positive-definite trust-region models Algorithm
- Finite-budget Levenberg-Marquardt with a trust-ratio safeguard Algorithm
- The Cauchy step for a quadratic trust-region model Algorithm
- Truncated conjugate gradients with boundary and negative-curvature exits Algorithm
- A singular shifted Hessian produces two hard-case minimizers Example
- An indefinite quadratic has a unique boundary trust-region minimizer Example
- Newton, Cauchy, and truncated-CG steps on one indefinite model Example
- A damped least-squares step solves a scaled trust-region model Lemma
- Global trust-region minimizers satisfy the shifted-Hessian conditions, including the hard case Lemma
- Positive-definite Newton and dogleg steps are well-defined Lemma
- The actual-to-predicted ratio approaches one at small radii away from stationarity Lemma
- The Cauchy step gives a quantitative model decrease Lemma
- Truncated-CG iterates are feasible and lie in generated Krylov subspaces Lemma
- Uniformly large damping forces an acceptable LM trial in finitely many attempts Lemma
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jorge Nocedal and Stephen J. Wright, Numerical Optimization, second edition (standard reference, not scraped)
- Nick Gould, Continuous Optimization Algorithms, Part 3.2: Trust-Region Methods (standard reference, not scraped)