How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Two-stage randomized design and strategy-specific effects
Definition
Let groups have fixed sizes , and let the fixed potential outcomes satisfy partial interference as in Finite-population potential outcomes under partial interference. Let and be two group-specific treatment-allocation strategies. Under strategy , group has a fixed treated count . Fix . The two-stage design first chooses uniformly a set of exactly groups for , assigning the other groups to . Conditional on these strategy labels, it independently chooses in each group a uniformly random -element subset for treatment, where is that group's strategy. Here denotes the number of -element subsets of an -element set. Thus, for any strategy vector with exactly entries equal to and any assignment vectors with , all other pairs have probability zero. In particular, and , both positive.
Write for expectation under the finite uniform assignment law within group under strategy . Conditional means given are the finite conditional weighted sums, defined because that event has probability strictly between zero and one; Conditional expectation on positive-probability events in finite spaces verifies that their piecewise versions satisfy the integral characterization of Conditional expectation given a sigma algebra. Define the strategy-specific group and population mean potential outcomes by for , and These are finite-population estimands: the outcomes are fixed, and the expectations average only over the specified within-group assignment strategy. Define
For an observed design realization, put and , and define, whenever , The denominators are the fixed, positive realized arm sizes. With and , define the observed population estimators The four strategy-contrast estimators , , , and are obtained by replacing each mean in the corresponding displayed target by its hatted estimator. No stratified-interference or additive-effects assumption is part of this design definition.
Depends on
- Finite-population potential outcomes under partial interference
- Finite randomized treatment-assignment models
- Finite probability spaces, outcome weights, events, and event probabilities
- Expectation of a real random variable on a finite probability space
- Conditional expectation given a sigma algebra
- Estimands on a statistical model
- Statistics and estimators
- Laws of finite sums and finite products
- Conditional expectation on positive-probability events in finite spaces
Used by
- Stratified interference and source design-based variance estimators Definition
- A finite two-stage village strategy comparison Example
- Finite two-stage sampling variance identities Lemma
- Stratified-interference variance estimators are conservative Theorem
- Two-stage strategy-specific effect estimators are design-unbiased Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michael G. Hudgens and M. Elizabeth Halloran, Toward Causal Inference With Interference, §§2.1–4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Graeme Blair, Alexander Coppock, and Macartan Humphreys, Research Design in the Social Sciences, §§18.9–18.10 (standard reference, not scraped)