Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Upper and lower semicontinuous envelopes by local limsup and liminf

Definition

Let A⊆Rm be nonempty (The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement) and let u:A→R. For x∈A and r>0 put Mr(x):=sup⁡{u(y):y∈A, ∣y−x∣≤r},mr(x):=inf⁡{u(y):y∈A, ∣y−x∣≤r}, the supremum and infimum being taken in R‾=R∪{±∞} (The extended real line R‾=R∪{−∞,+∞}, its order, and the arithmetic that is left undefined, Greatest lower bound (infimum), Every subset of R‾ has a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound in R‾, agreeing with the real supremum and infimum on nonempty sets bounded in R).

The upper semicontinuous envelope of u is u∗(x):=inf⁡r>0Mr(x)=lim⁡r↓0 sup⁡y∈A∣y−x∣≤ru(y), and the lower semicontinuous envelope of u is u∗(x):=sup⁡r>0mr(x)=lim⁡r↓0 inf⁡y∈A∣y−x∣≤ru(y), both with values in R‾.

Remarks

  • The limits exist. For fixed x∈A the map r↦Mr(x) is nondecreasing in r (the set it is taken over grows with r) and the map r↦mr(x) is nonincreasing in r, so the one-sided limits as r↓0 exist in R‾, with inf⁡r>0Mr(x)=lim⁡r↓0Mr(x) and sup⁡r>0mr(x)=lim⁡r↓0mr(x). Since A is nonempty, the sets over which the suprema and infima are taken are nonempty; infinite values are kept rather than discarded.
  • Comparison with u. For every x∈A one has mr(x)≤u(x)≤Mr(x) for all r>0, hence u∗(x)≤u(x)≤u∗(x) pointwise. If u is bounded on A, then all values Mr(x),mr(x) lie between inf⁡Au and sup⁡Au, so u∗ and u∗ are real-valued and bounded on A; this is a sufficient hypothesis for real-valued envelopes. Local boundedness near each point also suffices, because only arbitrarily small radii affect the defining infimum and supremum.
  • Scope. These are the envelopes of u on the Euclidean set A. The space--time cylinder of The Hamilton--Jacobi Cauchy problem and its classical solutions is used with m=n+1 and A=Z, and the envelope notation is the one appearing in the stability, Perron and comparison statements of this page (Upper and lower semicontinuity on subsets of Rn is the underlying mode of semicontinuity). No choice is used: each envelope is the value of a monotone limit indexed by r, hence by r=1/k, and no sequence or point is selected.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources