How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A product cobordism is an h-cobordism
Example
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be a closed smooth -manifold with and let with faces and . Then is an h-cobordism: the maps , , are retractions and the linear homotopies are deformation retractions fixing pointwise, so both inclusions are homotopy equivalences. Its handle decomposition relative to is empty, its relative homology vanishes in all degrees, and if is simply connected with the h-cobordism theorem returns exactly this product.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice and a closed smooth -manifold with , its product with the two faces and , and the inclusions , .
A retraction of onto is a continuous with , equivalently on ; is a deformation retract when in addition there is a homotopy fixing pointwise (Retractions and deformation retracts, with a deformation retraction required to fix the retract pointwise).
A compact smooth cobordism triad is an h-cobordism when both face inclusions are homotopy equivalences (h-Cobordism).
For a compact boundaryless smooth manifold the product has the empty handle decomposition relative to : the projection is an adapted Morse function without critical points and is diffeomorphic to the collar , no handle being attached (Product cobordisms have critical-point-free presentations).
Verification
The projections , , are continuous and satisfy for every , so by [F1] each is a retraction onto the corresponding face.
Read the product presentation through [F3]: has the empty handle list relative to , and no handle is attached.
The linear homotopy is continuous with and , and it satisfies for all ; hence by [F1] each face is a deformation retract of , in particular each inclusion is a homotopy equivalence with homotopy inverse . The product is a compact smooth triad with its product collars and dimension , so by [F2] the triad is an h-cobordism.
The relative homology now vanishes by Relative homology of an h-cobordism vanishes at both ends, applied to step 2.1. Therefore the product cobordism has an empty presentation and vanishing relative homology; when is simply connected of dimension , the later h-cobordism theorem applied to this h-cobordism returns precisely the product it started from, so the product is the trivial model that the theorem's conclusion describes.
Depends on
- h-Cobordism
- Retractions and deformation retracts, with a deformation retraction required to fix the retract pointwise
- Product cobordisms have critical-point-free presentations
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Relative homology of an h-cobordism vanishes at both ends
- The smooth simply connected h-cobordism theorem
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Milnor, Lectures on the h-Cobordism Theorem (notes by L. Siebenmann and J. Sondow, Princeton University Press 1965; scanned edition with searchable text layer) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Wolfgang Lück, A Basic Introduction to Surgery Theory (ICTP lecture notes, 27 October 2004; complete author text) (standard reference, not scraped)