Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A product cobordism is an h-cobordism

Example

Assume ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let M0 be a closed smooth n-manifold with n≥1 and let W=M0×[0,1] with faces M0×{0} and M0×{1}. Then (W;M0×{0},M0×{1}) is an h-cobordism: the maps W→M0×{i}, (x,t)↦(x,i), are retractions and the linear homotopies (x,t)↦(x,(1−s)t+si) are deformation retractions fixing M0×{i} pointwise, so both inclusions are homotopy equivalences. Its handle decomposition relative to M0×{0} is empty, its relative homology vanishes in all degrees, and if M0 is simply connected with n≥5 the h-cobordism theorem returns exactly this product.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice and a closed smooth n-manifold M0 with n≥1, its product W=M0×[0,1] with the two faces M0×{0} and M0×{1}, and the inclusions ι0:M0×{0}↪W, ι1:M0×{1}↪W.

[F1]

A retraction of X onto A is a continuous r:X→A with r∘i=id⁡A, equivalently r(a)=a on A; A is a deformation retract when in addition there is a homotopy H:id⁡X≃Ai∘r fixing A pointwise (Retractions and deformation retracts, with a deformation retraction required to fix the retract pointwise).

[F2]

A compact smooth cobordism triad is an h-cobordism when both face inclusions are homotopy equivalences (h-Cobordism).

[F3]

For a compact boundaryless smooth manifold M the product W=M×[0,1] has the empty handle decomposition relative to M×{0}: the projection W→[0,1] is an adapted Morse function without critical points and W is diffeomorphic to the collar M0×[0,1], no handle being attached (Product cobordisms have critical-point-free presentations).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1given

The projections ri:W→M0×{i}, ri(x,t)=(x,i), are continuous and satisfy ri(ιi(x))=ri(x,i)=(x,i)=ιi(x) for every x∈M0, so by [F1] each ri is a retraction onto the corresponding face.

1.2F3given

Read the product presentation through [F3]: W has the empty handle list relative to M0×{0}, and no handle is attached.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

The linear homotopy Hs(x,t)=(x,(1−s)t+si) is continuous with H0=id⁡W and H1=ιi∘ri, and it satisfies Hs(x,i)=(x,i) for all s; hence by [F1] each face is a deformation retract of W, in particular each inclusion is a homotopy equivalence with homotopy inverse ri. The product is a compact smooth triad with its product collars and dimension n+1≥2, so by [F2] the triad (W;M0×{0},M0×{1}) is an h-cobordism.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

The relative homology now vanishes by Relative homology of an h-cobordism vanishes at both ends, applied to step 2.1. Therefore the product cobordism has an empty presentation and vanishing relative homology; when M0 is simply connected of dimension n≥5, the later h-cobordism theorem applied to this h-cobordism returns precisely the product it started from, so the product is the trivial model that the theorem's conclusion describes.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources