How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Relative homology of an h-cobordism vanishes at both ends
Statement
Let be an h-cobordism (h-Cobordism) and let be any abelian coefficient group. Then and for every ; equivalently, each inclusion induces an isomorphism for all . In particular for both ends. No orientability, finite generation or simple connectivity hypothesis is used, and the conclusion is symmetric in the two ends.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An h-cobordism and an abelian group .
Both face inclusions of an h-cobordism are homotopy equivalences: the triad has and both and are homotopy equivalences; the definition is symmetric in the two faces (h-Cobordism).
If is a homotopy equivalence, then for every and every abelian group the induced map is an isomorphism (Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on singular homology).
For every subspace the singular homology groups of the pair form the long exact sequence (the display is printed for and degree in the source), and denotes the relative singular homology group in degree (Long exact sequence of a pair, Relative singular homology).
Proof
By [F1] the inclusion is a homotopy equivalence, so by [F2] the induced map is an isomorphism for every , in particular surjective; the same applies to .
Fix and read the exact sequence of [F3] for the pair around , namely . Surjectivity of together with exactness at makes the zero map; injectivity of together with exactness at makes the zero map (for the group is zero, so is automatically zero). The image of the zero map is , so exactness at gives , and since this says .
Interchanging the roles of and , which is legitimate for an h-cobordism by [F1], the argument of step 2.1 gives for every . By step 1.1 each inclusion induces an isomorphism in every degree, and specialising gives .
Depends on
Used by
- A product cobordism is an h-cobordism Example
- Acyclicity makes the simply connected middle-handle matrix unimodular Lemma
- Middle-handle pairs with one geometric intersection cancel Lemma
- Trading concentrates a simply connected h-cobordism in two adjacent middle indices Lemma
- The smooth simply connected h-cobordism theorem Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Milnor, Lectures on the h-Cobordism Theorem (notes by L. Siebenmann and J. Sondow, Princeton University Press 1965; scanned edition with searchable text layer) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Wolfgang Lück, A Basic Introduction to Surgery Theory (ICTP lecture notes, 27 October 2004; complete author text) (standard reference, not scraped)