Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Relative homology of an h-cobordism vanishes at both ends

Statement

Let (W;M0,M1) be an h-cobordism (h-Cobordism) and let G be any abelian coefficient group. Then Hk(W,M0;G)=0 and Hk(W,M1;G)=0 for every k≥0; equivalently, each inclusion Mi↪W induces an isomorphism Hk(Mi;G)→Hk(W;G) for all k≥0. In particular Hk(W,Mi;Z)=0 for both ends. No orientability, finite generation or simple connectivity hypothesis is used, and the conclusion is symmetric in the two ends.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An h-cobordism (W;M0,M1) and an abelian group G.

[F1]

Both face inclusions of an h-cobordism are homotopy equivalences: the triad (W;M0,M1) has dim⁡W=n+1≥2 and both M0↪W and M1↪W are homotopy equivalences; the definition is symmetric in the two faces (h-Cobordism).

[F2]

If f:X→Y is a homotopy equivalence, then for every n≥0 and every abelian group G the induced map Hn(f#):Hnsing(X;G)→Hnsing(Y;G) is an isomorphism (Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on singular homology).

[F3]

For every subspace A⊆X the singular homology groups of the pair form the long exact sequence ⋯→Hk(A;G)→Hk(X;G)→Hk(X,A;G)→δHk−1(A;G)→Hk−1(X;G)→⋯ (the display is printed for n and degree n−1 in the source), and Hk(X,A;G) denotes the relative singular homology group in degree k (Long exact sequence of a pair, Relative singular homology).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2given

By [F1] the inclusion ι0:M0↪W is a homotopy equivalence, so by [F2] the induced map Hk(ι0;G):Hk(M0;G)→Hk(W;G) is an isomorphism for every k≥0, in particular surjective; the same applies to ι1:M1↪W.

2.1F3step 1.1

Fix k≥0 and read the exact sequence of [F3] for the pair (W,M0) around Hk(W,M0;G), namely Hk(M0;G)→Hk(ι0;G)Hk(W;G)→Hk(W,M0;G)→δHk−1(M0;G)→Hk−1(ι0;G)Hk−1(W;G). Surjectivity of Hk(ι0;G) together with exactness at Hk(W;G) makes Hk(W;G)→Hk(W,M0;G) the zero map; injectivity of Hk−1(ι0;G) together with exactness at Hk−1(M0;G) makes δ the zero map (for k=0 the group H−1(M0;G) is zero, so δ is automatically zero). The image of the zero map Hk(W;G)→Hk(W,M0;G) is 0, so exactness at Hk(W,M0;G) gives ker⁡δ=0, and since δ=0 this says Hk(W,M0;G)=0.

3.1F1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1∎

Interchanging the roles of M0 and M1, which is legitimate for an h-cobordism by [F1], the argument of step 2.1 gives Hk(W,M1;G)=0 for every k≥0. By step 1.1 each inclusion induces an isomorphism in every degree, and specialising G=Z gives Hk(W,M0;Z)=Hk(W,M1;Z)=0.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources