Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The smooth simply connected h-cobordism theorem

Statement

Assume ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let (W;M0,M1) be an h-cobordism with dim⁡W=n+1≥6 (equivalently n≥5), where M0,M1 are closed simply connected n-manifolds and W is connected (h-Cobordism, Simply connected topological spaces). Then W is diffeomorphic to M0×[0,1] relative to M0: there is a diffeomorphism W→M0×[0,1] that is the identity on M0. In particular every h-cobordism over a closed simply connected n-manifold with n≥5 is trivial. The dimension hypothesis n≥5 is used in the elimination of one-handles and in the Whitney-trick step; simple connectivity is used in those steps and in the diagonalisation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An h-cobordism (W;M0,M1) with dim⁡W=n+1≥6, closed simply connected faces and connected W; ACω.

[F1]

Every compact h-cobordism admits an adapted ordered handle presentation relative to M0, with all k-handles attached at one level before all (k+1)-handles (h-Cobordisms admit adapted ordered handle decompositions).

[F2]

The relative homology of an h-cobordism vanishes in every degree k≥0: Hk(W,M0;Z)=0 (Relative homology of an h-cobordism vanishes at both ends).

[F3]

Under the dimension and simple connectivity hypotheses, W admits a presentation relative to M0 with no handles of index 0 or 1 (Zero- and one-handles are eliminated in a simply connected h-cobordism) and, dually, no handles of index n or n+1 (Duality eliminates the top and codimension-one handles).

[F4]

For every admissible k∈{2,…,n−2} the presentation may be concentrated in the two adjacent indices k,k+1, with the same number r of handles of each index and relative handle complex 0→Zr→Zr→0 (Trading concentrates a simply connected h-cobordism in two adjacent middle indices).

[F5]

The middle-handle intersection matrix of such a two-index presentation is invertible over Z (Acyclicity makes the simply connected middle-handle matrix unimodular), and handle slides, renumbering and reorientation carry it to the identity matrix Ir while preserving W relative to M0 (Handle slides, renumberings and reorientations reduce a unimodular middle-handle matrix to the identity).

[F6]

In the resulting presentation the Whitney trick upgrades the identity matrix to the geometric single-point configuration (The Whitney trick realizes algebraic middle-handle cancellation geometrically), and then the pairs cancel, leaving an empty presentation (Middle-handle pairs with one geometric intersection cancel).

[F7]

An empty presentation relative to M0 is exactly a product: W is diffeomorphic to M0×[0,1] relative to M0 (A cobordism with no handles is a product).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2given

By [F1] put the h-cobordism in self-indexed form relative to M0, so that its handles are attached in order of increasing index and Hk(W,M0;Z)=0 for all k by [F2]; the relative handle chain complex of this presentation computes H∗(W,M0;Z).

2.1F3step 1.1

Use the simultaneous elimination supplied by the duality lemma in [F3]: its low-eliminate/reverse/low-eliminate/reverse procedure yields one presentation relative to M0 with every index between 2 and n−1.

3.1F2F4step 2.1

Since n≥5 there is an admissible index k with 2≤k≤n−2 (for instance k=2, and in higher dimensions any k with 3≤k≤n−3), and by [F4] the presentation may be concentrated in the two adjacent indices k,k+1: handles only of index k and k+1 remain, with the same number r of each, and the relative handle complex is 0→Zr→Zr→0 with differential an isomorphism because the homology H∗(W,M0;Z) vanishes by [F2].

4.1F5F6step 3.1

By [F5] the middle-handle intersection matrix M of this presentation is invertible over Z, and handle slides, renumbering and reorientation carry it to the identity Ir without changing W relative to M0; by [F6] the Whitney trick then upgrades the algebraic identity to the geometric single-point configuration, in which each (k+1)-handle meets the belt sphere of exactly one k-handle once and is disjoint from the others, and the resulting pairs are deleted one after another by handle cancellation.

5.1F7givenstep 4.1∎

When all pairs have been cancelled, the presentation of W relative to M0 is empty, and by [F7] an empty presentation is exactly a product: there is a diffeomorphism W→M0×[0,1] whose restriction to M0 is the identity. Hence every h-cobordism over a closed simply connected n-manifold with n≥5 is trivial. This is the classical smooth simply connected h-cobordism theorem of Milnor, Lück and Ranicki.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

84 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources