How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The h-cobordism theorem does not cover boundary dimension four
Remark
The dimension hypothesis (equivalently ) in the smooth h-cobordism theorem (The smooth simply connected h-cobordism theorem) cannot be relaxed to . Two distinct obstructions are recorded here.
(i) The proof route stops working: the general-position argument that produces a clean embedded Whitney disk in a middle level of dimension requires both sheet dimensions at most , or one of them at least in the borderline version, and in boundary dimension four the relevant ambient middle level is four-dimensional, where the smooth Whitney trick genuinely fails (The smooth Whitney trick fails in dimension four).
(ii) The conclusion itself fails in the smooth category in general: the s-cobordism theorem, and with it the triviality statement of the h-cobordism theorem, is known to be false for in general by Donaldson's work (Lück §1.5, printed p. 21, citing Donaldson, Irrationality and the h-cobordism conjecture, J. Differential Geom. 26 (1987) 141--168), while in the topological category the corresponding statement for holds for good fundamental groups, in particular for the trivial group, by Freedman. For simply connected 4-manifolds the failure is documented explicitly: there are smooth orientable simply connected 4-manifolds that are all smoothly s-cobordant and homeomorphic but pairwise not diffeomorphic, so no h-cobordism between two of them is a product (Kasprowski--Powell--Ray, EMS Surv. Math. Sci. 9 (2022) 193--249, Example 1.13 and §5.8, where the first pair is due to Donaldson). Milnor's Concluding Remarks distinguish total dimension four (boundary dimension three), where the four-disk conjecture is discussed, from total dimension five (the boundary-dimension-four case here). The historical four-disk discussion is not a statement about this boundary-dimension-four range.
No smooth four-dimensional Poincaré or disk conclusion may be read off the theorem of this page: the smooth statement is genuinely restricted to boundary dimension at least five (h-Cobordism).
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Milnor, Lectures on the h-Cobordism Theorem (notes by L. Siebenmann and J. Sondow, Princeton University Press 1965; scanned edition with searchable text layer) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Wolfgang Lück, A Basic Introduction to Surgery Theory (ICTP lecture notes, 27 October 2004; complete author text) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Daniel Kasprowski, Mark Powell and Arunima Ray, Counterexamples in 4-manifold topology, EMS Surveys in Mathematical Sciences 9 (2022) 193--249 (standard reference, not scraped)