Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Homotopy spheres of dimension at least five bounding a contractible manifold are standard spheres

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be a compact contractible smooth (n+1)-manifold with connected boundary Σ=∂X, where n≥5 and Σ is a homotopy n-sphere (equivalently by Hurewicz and Whitehead: Σ is simply connected and H∗(Σ;Z)≅H∗(Sn;Z)) (Simply connected topological spaces, Absolute Hurewicz theorem at the first nonzero degree, Whitehead theorem). Then X is diffeomorphic to the disk Dn+1, and Σ is diffeomorphic to Sn. Consequently a smooth homotopy n-sphere, n≥5, that bounds a compact contractible smooth manifold is diffeomorphic to the standard sphere, and no exotic sphere in these dimensions bounds a contractible manifold.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact contractible smooth (n+1)-manifold X with connected boundary Σ=∂X a homotopy n-sphere, n≥5; the Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

A nonempty contractible space has the singular homology of a point in every degree and coefficient group (Contractible nonempty spaces have the homology of a point), and the relative chain complexes are free, so the cohomological universal coefficient sequence computes Hj from the homology (The cohomology universal-coefficient sequence splits nonnaturally).

[F2]

Under AC, for every numerable real bundle E→B of rank n≥0 over a CW complex or an admissible base (a paracompact Hausdorff CGWH space of CW homotopy type), w1(E)=0 if and only if E is orientable; applied to the tangent bundle, this says X is orientable since w1(TX)∈H1(X;Z/2)=0 (The first Stiefel–Whitney class classifies orientability).

[F3]

If X=U∪V is a two-set van Kampen cover with path-connected members and simply connected overlap, then π1(U)∗π1(V)≅π1(X); for n≥2 the sphere Sn is simply connected (A simply connected overlap turns the van Kampen pushout into a free product, Sn is simply connected for every n≥2, Simply connected topological spaces).

[F4]

Excision: if Z⊆X has closure contained in the interior of A, then H∗(X−Z,A−Z;G)≅H∗(X,A;G) for all degrees and coefficients, and the long exact sequence of a pair computes relative groups from acyclic absolute groups (Excision for singular homology, Long exact sequence of a pair).

[F5]

For a compact Z-oriented manifold whose boundary is a disjoint union of two closed boundary manifolds A⊔B, cap with the relative fundamental class gives Hp(W,A;Z)≅Hn+1−p(W,B;Z) (Fully relative Poincaré–Lefschetz duality).

[F6]

Compact smooth manifolds have finite CW homotopy models (A handle decomposition gives a relative CW complex). On these models, the relative homotopy exact sequence and relative Hurewicz convert a homology equivalence between simply connected spaces into a weak equivalence, and Whitehead makes it a homotopy equivalence under the assumed AC (Long exact sequence of relative homotopy groups); an h-cobordism is a cobordism whose two face inclusions are homotopy equivalences (Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on singular homology, Relative Hurewicz theorem in the simple-connectivity range, Whitehead theorem, Homotopy equivalences, homotopy inverses and spaces of the same homotopy type).

[F7]

Every smooth manifold with boundary has a smooth collar, and a disk glued to a product along its boundary sphere restores the disk: Dn+1≅(Sn×[0,1])∪Sn×{0}Dn+1 (Collar neighborhood theorem, Smooth collars of a manifold boundary).

[F8]

The h-cobordism theorem identifies every h-cobordism over a closed simply connected n-manifold with the product for n≥5 (The smooth simply connected h-cobordism theorem).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

Choose an embedded closed (n+1)-disk Dn+1⊂int⁡X (Smooth embeddings) and put W:=X∖int⁡Dn+1; then W is a compact smooth (n+1)-manifold with boundary the disjoint union Σ⊔Sn of the given boundary and the boundary sphere of the removed disk, and W is connected: remove a point at the disk center, reroute paths locally around that point in dimension n+1≥6, then radially retract the punctured disk onto its boundary. The same construction retains compactness and the smooth boundary collars.

1.2F1F2F6given

The compact smooth X has CW homotopy type by [F6], and a finite chart cover with a subordinate smooth partition (Smooth partitions of unity exist on manifolds) supplies a numeration of its tangent bundle. Thus [F2] applies to this bundle. X is orientable: H∗(X;Z/2)=H∗(pt;Z/2) by [F1], so the universal coefficient sequence gives H1(X;Z/2)=0 (both Hom⁡(H1(X),Z/2) and Ext⁡(H0(X),Z/2) vanish because H1(X)=0 and H0(X)=Z is free); hence w1(TX)=0 and by [F2] the tangent bundle TX is orientable, so X carries an orientation and W inherits the restricted orientation.

2.1F3given

π1(W)=1: use the open cover U=X∖D0, V=int⁡Dn+1, where D0 is a smaller concentric closed disk. Radial compression retracts U onto W, V is contractible and U∩V≅Sn×(a,1) is simply connected by [F3]. Both open members are path connected by step 1.1 and radial compression. Van Kampen therefore gives π1(X)≅π1(W)∗π1(Dn+1)=π1(W), and π1(X)=1 because X is contractible, so π1(W)=1.

2.2F4step 1.1

H∗(W,Sn;Z)=0: let D0⊂int⁡Dn+1 be a smaller closed concentric disk; then excision [F4] with Z=D0 and A=Dn+1 gives H∗(X−D0,Dn+1−D0;Z)≅H∗(X,Dn+1;Z)=0, the last vanishing because X and Dn+1 are acyclic and [F4] computes the pair by its long exact sequence; the pair (X−D0,Dn+1−D0) deformation retracts through a collar onto (W,Sn), so H∗(W,Sn;Z)=0 as well.

3.1F1F5step 1.2step 2.2

H∗(W,Σ;Z)=0: by step 1.2 the manifold W is compact and Z-oriented with boundary the disjoint union Σ⊔Sn, so [F5] with A=Sn, B=Σ gives Hk(W,Σ;Z)≅Hn+1−k(W,Sn;Z); by the universal coefficient sequence [F1] applied to the relative chain complex and step 2.2, the group Hn+1−k(W,Sn;Z) vanishes, so Hk(W,Σ;Z)=0.

4.1F4F6step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1

Both end inclusions induce homology isomorphisms by the pair sequences and steps 2.2–3.1. The sources and W are nonempty simply connected. Transport each map to the finite CW models of [F6] and replace it by a cellular map under AC (Cellular approximation for maps of CW pairs). Its CW mapping-cylinder pair is 1-connected and has zero relative integral homology. Inductively, if its relative homotopy groups below j≥2 vanish, relative Hurewicz in [F6] identifies πj with the zero Hj; hence all relative groups vanish. The relative homotopy exact sequence makes the map a weak equivalence, and Whitehead yields a homotopy inverse. Transport it back to the original manifolds. Thus the two actual end inclusions are homotopy equivalences and W is an h-cobordism.

5.1F7F8step 4.1∎

By the h-cobordism theorem [F8] applied to the h-cobordism W with dim⁡W=n+1≥6, there is a diffeomorphism W→Sn×[0,1] that is the identity on Sn; its restriction to the other face is a diffeomorphism Σ→Sn. Gluing the disk back along the collar by [F7] identifies X with (Sn×[0,1])∪Sn×{0}Dn+1≅Dn+1, so X is diffeomorphic to the disk and Σ to Sn. This is Milnor's Proposition A of §9.

The full AC hypothesis licenses the cited UCT, orientability, duality, Hurewicz and CW comparison results as stated. The h-cobordism theorem itself uses only countable choice; AC supplies it by restricting a choice function to a countable family. For the parenthetical homology-sphere criterion, absolute Hurewicz gives vanishing homotopy below n and a map Sn→Σ representing a generator of Hn; it is a homology equivalence, so the same CW comparison proves it is a homotopy equivalence.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

154 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources