How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A singular integral A2 central-character summand
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).
Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra , a Cartan subalgebra , and a positive Borel . Write , when , and .
In type , take , with fundamental-weight coordinates . Then has Weyl stabilizer . The dot orbit consists of
These three simple labels form a single singular integral central-character block. Only labels and stabilizer are computed here.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, the setting above, and the hypotheses in the example.
The category is the categorical direct sum of its generalized central-character subcategories , with exact component projections (Generalized central-character decomposition of O).
Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra , a Cartan subalgebra , and a positive Borel . Write , when , and . For a weight , define Reflections and coroots are those of def-root-reflections-and-the-weyl-group-action, with the shift from def-weyl-vector-rho-for-a-chosen-positive-system. The integral-reflection linkage class through is . The word integral includes zero and negative integral pairings. If is empty the generated group is . This definition uses generating reflections; no identification with a root-lattice-coset stabilizer is assumed. (The integral Weyl group of a weight)
Under the given Choice premise, let and be the central characters obtained from highest weights and . Then where . (Central characters are dot-Weyl orbits)
Let be the root system from thm-the-root-set-is-a-reduced-crystallographic-root-system. For a root , define the corresponding coroot by where is the vector from def-killing-dual-vector-attached-to-a-root. The associated root reflection is the linear map The subgroup of generated by these reflections is the Weyl group , acting on in the usual way. (Root reflections and the Weyl group action)
Every simple object of is for a unique highest weight (The simple objects of O). Its generalized-character membership means each acts locally nilpotently (Generalized central-character subcategories), while acts on any cyclic highest-weight module by the scalar (The Harish-Chandra projection computes the highest-weight scalar).
Under the given Choice premise, every object of has a finite composition series (Every object of O has finite length). Every Verma module has a unique simple quotient (A Verma module has a unique simple quotient).
A positive integral simple-root pairing gives a nonzero Verma embedding in the reflected direction (Simple-reflection embeddings of Verma modules).
Verification
With and , the reflection formula gives and . Acting on produces exactly : both reflection formulas permute this set and the three displayed points are reachable. Subtracting gives , the claimed labels.
Type has six Weyl elements, as is also seen by the six distinct matrices : multiplication by either generator permutes these six matrices. Exactly and fix , by evaluating them. Thus the stabilizer is , and the orbit is singular.
The pairings of with the positive coroots are . All are integers, so and by F2; the zero pairing does not remove its reflection from the integral group. By F3 the three computed labels have one central character . Conversely, a simple object of is by F5. On it every acts both by and locally with generalized eigenvalue , so ; F3 restricts to the three labels in step 1.1. Thus these are exactly the simple objects of .
Write the labels as , , and . Their shifted simple-root pairings are and , so F7 gives . By F3 and the highest-weight scalar action in F5, all three Vermas lie in . The unique-simple-quotient property in F6 makes indecomposable: in a decomposition into two nonzero submodules both would be proper, and their sum would lie in its unique maximal proper submodule. In any categorical direct-sum refinement of , must lie in one component; its subquotients therefore lie there too. These are all the simple objects by step 3.1, and F6 makes every nonzero object have a simple factor. Hence no other nonzero component exists: is indecomposable. F1 makes it a direct summand of , so it is one singular integral block with exactly the three stated simple labels.
Notes
The source gives a typical three-element singular A2 class with an antidominant representative. This item chooses the explicit representative -omega1 of such a class and computes its coordinates; statement provenance is ai-altered to record that specialization.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Generalized central-character decomposition of O
- The integral Weyl group of a weight
- Central characters are dot-Weyl orbits
- Root reflections and the Weyl group action
- The simple objects of O
- Generalized central-character subcategories
- The Harish-Chandra projection computes the highest-weight scalar
- Every object of O has finite length
- A Verma module has a unique simple quotient
- Simple-reflection embeddings of Verma modules
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- §4.11 Exercise, pp.85–86, singular three-element class (standard reference, not scraped)