How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Harmonic measure of the two annulus boundary circles
Example
Assume Dependent Choice. Let , let be the round annulus (Annuli in the complex plane), and let and be its two boundary circles. Then is a bounded regular plane domain in the sense of Harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain, so its harmonic measure exists at every , and with both values in and sum . This is the logarithmic-radius calculation; a full Fourier-series density on either circle is not asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Radii , the round annulus (Annuli in the complex plane), a point , and Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain). Boundaries are topological (Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space), continuity is that of Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally, harmonic measure is as in Harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain, and barriers are as in Barriers and regular boundary points.
is an open subset of with for every , hence a bounded open set; a connected open subset of is a complex domain (A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of , Annuli in the complex plane).
If every boundary point of a bounded complex domain is regular, then under Dependent Choice the harmonic measure exists and is the unique Radon Borel probability measure with for every continuous boundary datum, and is the unique continuous extension to the closure that is harmonic on the domain and agrees with on the boundary (Existence and uniqueness of harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain, Harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain).
A barrier at a boundary point forces that point to be regular (A planar barrier forces the regularized Perron envelope to have the prescribed boundary limit, Barriers and regular boundary points); here a barrier at is a subharmonic on the domain with as and with each closed set of boundary points outside a neighbourhood of kept uniformly away from .
The function is harmonic on (Logarithmic modulus is harmonic off its centre); composition with a holomorphic map preserves harmonicity (Plane harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic and antiholomorphic changes of coordinate); real linear combinations of harmonic functions are harmonic, since harmonicity is the condition (Plane harmonic functions); and a function with is subharmonic, so in particular every harmonic function is subharmonic (A function is subharmonic exactly when its Laplacian is nonnegative, Subharmonic functions on plane domains).
The two circles and are disjoint closed subsets of whose union is ; each is the complement of the other in , so each is also open in (Annuli in the complex plane, Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space). Consequently the function equal to on and to on is continuous: every point of lies in one of the two circles and is at positive distance from the other, so is constant near that point (Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally).
Verification
The annulus is connected: for , , the path , , has modulus between and and hence values in , and it joins to . Together with openness and boundedness from [F1] this makes a bounded complex domain.
Boundary points of the outer circle are regular. Fix and set , so that and . Define for . Since , the map is a holomorphic map with values in on the open set containing , so is harmonic on by [F4] and is harmonic, hence subharmonic, on by [F4]. For the reverse triangle inequality gives , so ; and with continuous at , so as . Finally on with equality only at : on the identity holds exactly when , and on one has . Hence for every neighbourhood of the continuous function is strictly negative on the compact set (if that set is empty there is nothing to bound), so its maximum there is some ; thus is a barrier at , and is regular by [F3].
Boundary points of the inner circle are regular. Fix and set , so that and . Define for . Here , so is harmonic on by [F4] and hence subharmonic. For the reverse triangle inequality gives , so ; and with continuous at , so as . On one has with equality only at : the equality forces and on the ray through , that is , while for one has . So for every neighbourhood of the maximum of over the compact set is a , and is a barrier at ; by [F3] the point is regular.
Define for . On the annulus the function is a real linear combination of the harmonic function restricted to and the constant , divided by the nonzero constant , so is harmonic on by [F4]. On it takes the values for and for ; since is continuous and positive on the compact annulus , the formula extends continuously to . Thus is a continuous harmonic extension to of the continuous boundary function of [F5], so on by the uniqueness in [F2].
Steps 1.2 and 1.3 cover every point of , so every boundary point of the bounded complex domain is regular. By [F2] there is Dependent Choice used here to obtain the harmonic measure , the unique Radon probability measure on with for every continuous , and the Perron envelope of a continuous datum is its unique continuous harmonic extension.
Evaluating the representing identity of [F2] for at the point , and using on by [F5], gives
The complementary indicator is likewise continuous on , and is a probability measure, so
Since , both numerator quantities and are positive and their sum is , so the two masses lie in and sum to , as claimed. Dependent Choice was used only in step 2.1 through the existence and uniqueness theorem [F2]; the explicit barriers, the logarithmic function and all identities above are choice-free.
Remarks
The shaded annulus and the logarithmic-radius axis below show the two boundary components and the position of an interior point. The axis is in logarithmic coordinates, not Euclidean distance. Put ; the inner-circle mass is the fraction of the axis to the right of , and the outer-circle mass is the fraction to its left. Thus the boundary values of from step 1.4 are on and on . The verification above is independent of this illustration.
Depends on
- Barriers and regular boundary points
- Annuli in the complex plane
- A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of $\mathbb C$
- Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- Harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain
- Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space
- Plane harmonic functions
- Subharmonic functions on plane domains
- Logarithmic modulus is harmonic off its centre
- A planar barrier forces the regularized Perron envelope to have the prescribed boundary limit
- A $C^2$ function is subharmonic exactly when its Laplacian is nonnegative
- Plane harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic and antiholomorphic changes of coordinate
- Existence and uniqueness of harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mikhail Lyubich, Dynamics of Quadratic Polynomials, Vol. I, Appendix 1, Sections 10.1-10.9 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Axler, Bourdon and Ramey, Harmonic Function Theory, 2nd ed., Chapter 11 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Boris Khoruzhenko, LTCC Potential Theory lecture notes, Sections 4.1-4.2 (standard reference, not scraped)