How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Existence and uniqueness of harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain
Statement
Assume Dependent Choice, as required by the published positive Riesz-Markov representation theorem (Positive C_0(X) functionals have finite regular representing measures, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain). Then for every bounded regular plane domain , in the sense of Harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain, and every there is exactly one Radon Borel probability measure on with for every real continuous . Moreover, for each such the function is the unique continuous extension to that is harmonic on and agrees with on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A bounded complex domain every boundary point of which is regular (A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of , Barriers and regular boundary points, Harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain) and a point . Harmonicity is that of Plane harmonic functions; the Perron family and envelope are those of The Perron lower family for continuous boundary data and The Perron envelope and its regularization; Radon measures are as in Radon measure on an LCH space.
The boundary is closed, hence compact because is bounded, and carries the Borel sigma-algebra (Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space); the regularized Perron envelope of every continuous datum is harmonic on (The regularized Perron envelope is harmonic), and at every regular boundary point as inside (Barriers and regular boundary points).
Two functions continuous on and harmonic on with equal boundary values are equal (The bounded plane Dirichlet problem has at most one continuous harmonic solution); the constant belongs to the Perron lower family of any datum , the envelope satisfies , and (The Perron family is nonempty and uniformly bounded by the boundary data, The Perron envelope and its regularization).
Assume Dependent Choice. For a locally compact Hausdorff space and a bounded positive linear there is a unique finite regular Borel measure with and (Positive C_0(X) functionals have finite regular representing measures).
Proof
For a continuous datum define . Each is harmonic on and has the boundary limit at every boundary point by [F1], so the function equal to on and to on is continuous on ; by [F2] it is the unique continuous harmonic extension of .
The map is linear: for real and continuous the function is harmonic on and extends continuously to the boundary with values , so it equals by the uniqueness in step 1.1, and evaluating at gives .
The map is positive and normalized: if then the constant lies in the Perron family of by [F2], so and hence ; and because the constant function is a continuous harmonic extension of the boundary datum , so it equals by step 1.1. Consequently for every continuous , by applying positivity to and , and .
The boundary is compact by [F1], hence a locally compact Hausdorff space on which every continuous function has compact support, so ; by [F3] and there is a unique finite regular Borel measure on with for all continuous and .
The measure of step 3.1 is a Radon Borel probability measure representing every continuous boundary datum at , so it is a harmonic measure for at in the sense of the definition. If were another one, then for every continuous , so by the uniqueness in [F3]; hence the harmonic measure is unique.
Finally, for fixed continuous the function coincides with by the defining identity, so it is harmonic on and has the boundary values ; by step 1.1 it is the unique continuous harmonic extension. This is the only place where is used, through the representation theorem [F3]; the Perron input [F1] was used as a completed theorem.
Depends on
- The bounded plane Dirichlet problem has at most one continuous harmonic solution
- Barriers and regular boundary points
- The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space
- A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of $\mathbb C$
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- Harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain
- The Perron envelope and its regularization
- The Perron lower family for continuous boundary data
- Plane harmonic functions
- Radon measure on an LCH space
- The Perron family is nonempty and uniformly bounded by the boundary data
- Positive C_0(X) functionals have finite regular representing measures
- A continuous image of a compact space is compact; a continuous real-valued map on a nonempty compact space attains a maximum and a minimum; and a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism
- Heine-Borel in $\mathbb{R}^n$: with the Euclidean metric a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
- The regularized Perron envelope is harmonic
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
85 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mikhail Lyubich, Dynamics of Quadratic Polynomials, Vol. I, Appendix 1, Sections 10.1-10.9 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Boris Khoruzhenko, LTCC Potential Theory lecture notes, Sections 4.1-4.2 (standard reference, not scraped)