Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Conformal invariance of harmonic measure

Statement

Assume Dependent Choice. Let Ω,Ω′⊆C be bounded regular plane domains, in the sense of Harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain, and let F:Ω→Ω′ be a biholomorphism (Biholomorphic maps between complex domains) that extends to a homeomorphism F‾:Ω‾→Ω′‾ (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological). Then for every z∈Ω the pushforward boundary measure satisfies F‾∗ ωΩz=ωΩ′F(z) on all Borel subsets of ∂Ω′. No pushforward of a boundary measure is asserted without the closure homeomorphism: the transport is proved by equality of continuous harmonic extensions and not by a boundary correspondence alone.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Bounded plane domains Ω,Ω′ all of whose boundary points are regular (A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of C, Harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain), a biholomorphism F:Ω→Ω′, and a homeomorphism F‾:Ω‾→Ω′‾ extending F; also Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain).

[F1]

Under Dependent Choice the harmonic measures ωΩz and ωΩ′F(z) exist and are the unique Radon Borel probability measures on the compact boundaries representing their Perron envelopes (Existence and uniqueness of harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain): for continuous data ψ on ∂Ω and φ on ∂Ω′, HΩ,ψ(z)=∫ψ dωΩz and HΩ′,φ(F(z))=∫φ dωΩ′F(z).

[F2]

Regularity of every boundary point means HΩ,ψ(w)→ψ(ζ) as w→ζ inside Ω, for every ζ∈∂Ω and every continuous ψ; hence HΩ,ψ is continuous on Ω‾ when set equal to ψ on ∂Ω, and analogously for Ω′. Two continuous functions on Ω‾, harmonic on Ω, with equal boundary values coincide (Harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain, The bounded plane Dirichlet problem has at most one continuous harmonic solution).

[F3]

Composition with a holomorphic map preserves harmonicity (Plane harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic and antiholomorphic changes of coordinate), and a homeomorphism between the closures restricting to a bijection Ω→Ω′ carries ∂Ω onto ∂Ω′ (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological, Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally).

[F4]

Two finite regular Borel measures on a compact space that agree on all continuous functions coincide (Positive C_0(X) functionals have finite regular representing measures, Radon measure on an LCH space).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F3given

The map F‾ is a bijection of the compact sets Ω‾ and Ω′‾ restricting to the bijection F:Ω→Ω′; therefore it maps ∂Ω=Ω‾∖Ω onto Ω′‾∖Ω′=∂Ω′, and it is a homeomorphism between the two boundaries. Consequently, for continuous φ:∂Ω′→R the pullback φ∘F‾ is continuous on ∂Ω, and the pushforward (F‾∗ωΩz)(E):=ωΩz(F‾−1(E)) is well defined on Borel subsets of ∂Ω′.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

For continuous φ on ∂Ω′ and ψ:=φ∘F‾ on ∂Ω, the function u:=HΩ′,φ∘F is harmonic on Ω by [F3], since HΩ′,φ is harmonic on Ω′, and it extends continuously to ∂Ω with boundary values ψ, because HΩ′,φ extends continuously to Ω′‾ with values φ by [F2] and F‾ maps ∂Ω onto ∂Ω′ by step 1.1.

2.2F1step 1.1

The pushforward of step 1.1 represents the same value: by the defining property of ωΩz in [F1] and the change of variables defining the pushforward, ∫∂Ω′φ d(F‾∗ωΩz)=∫∂Ω(φ∘F‾) dωΩz=HΩ,ψ(z).

3.1F2step 2.1

The continuous harmonic extensions u=HΩ′,φ∘F and HΩ,ψ of step 2.1 have the same boundary values ψ on ∂Ω, so they coincide on Ω by [F2]; at z this is HΩ,ψ(z)=HΩ′,φ(F(z)).

4.1F1F4step 3.1step 2.2

Combining steps 3.1 and 2.2 with the defining property of ωΩ′F(z) in [F1] gives, for every continuous φ:∂Ω′→R, ∫∂Ω′φ d(F‾∗ωΩz)=HΩ′,φ(F(z))=∫∂Ω′φ dωΩ′F(z). Both sides are finite regular Borel measures on the compact boundary ∂Ω′, so by [F4] they coincide as measures, and in particular on every Borel subset of ∂Ω′.

5.1F1step 4.1∎

Therefore F‾∗ωΩz=ωΩ′F(z) on all Borel boundary sets. Dependent Choice was used only through the existence and uniqueness theorem [F1]; the transport itself is the identification of two continuous harmonic extensions with common boundary data, and no boundary behaviour of F beyond the given closure homeomorphism was assumed.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources