How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Poisson density of harmonic measure on a disc
Statement
Assume Dependent Choice for the general representing-measure interface. Let , , and let be the harmonic measure of the disc at , in the sense of Harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain. Writing for the boundary point of angle , one has, for every Borel subset and with the arclength parameter on the circle, The explicit Poisson kernel identity itself is a choice-free calculation; Dependent Choice enters only through the uniqueness theorem for harmonic measure.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A centre , a radius , a point , and Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain) for the uniqueness theorem. The Poisson kernel of the disc is as in The Poisson kernel on the unit disc, harmonic measure as in Harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain, and regular boundary points as in Barriers and regular boundary points.
For continuous the Poisson integral is harmonic on the unit disc, continuous on its closure, and equal to on the boundary, and it is the unique such function (The Poisson integral gives the unique continuous harmonic extension on the closed unit disc).
Under Dependent Choice, every bounded regular plane domain has exactly one harmonic measure at each interior point (Existence and uniqueness of harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain); the functions continuous on and harmonic on with equal boundary values coincide (The bounded plane Dirichlet problem has at most one continuous harmonic solution).
If is a barrier at a boundary point of a bounded complex domain , then is regular: for every continuous boundary datum the regularized Perron envelope has limit at (A planar barrier forces the regularized Perron envelope to have the prescribed boundary limit, Barriers and regular boundary points); a barrier at is a subharmonic on with as inside and with each boundary point outside a neighbourhood of kept away from uniformly.
The function is harmonic on (Logarithmic modulus is harmonic off its centre), and harmonicity is preserved by composition with holomorphic maps (Plane harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic and antiholomorphic changes of coordinate).
Proof
Every boundary point of a disc is regular. Fix and put , so that and . Define for . Then is harmonic on by [F4], since is the composition of with the translation , which is holomorphic and nowhere zero on the disc. Moreover for , so there; , so at by continuity of at . For every neighbourhood of , choose an open neighbourhood with . If is empty, the uniform separation condition in [F3] is vacuous and any works. Otherwise the continuous boundary extension of attains a strictly negative maximum on the nonempty compact set ; choosing this maximum as gives the required bound at every point of . Hence is a barrier at and is regular by [F3]; since was arbitrary, is a bounded regular plane domain.
For a continuous put and for . By [F1] applied to the unit disc, is harmonic on and continuous on its closure with boundary values . For the definition of the Poisson kernel gives, with , because and .
Since all boundary points of are regular by step 1.1, the regularized Perron envelope of a continuous datum is harmonic on and has the boundary limit at every boundary point; it is therefore a continuous harmonic extension of to the closure, and so is by step 1.2. Uniqueness [F2] gives , hence by step 1.2
Define the measure on by . The integrand is continuous and positive, so is a finite Borel measure on the compact circle, and step 2.1 says exactly that for every continuous ; taking and using the representation theorem of [F2], is a probability measure. Hence is a harmonic measure for at , and by the uniqueness in [F2], . Finally, the parametrization is arclength measured in units , so the density of with respect to is , which is the displayed second form.
Consequently the harmonic measure of the disc at has the Poisson density of the statement, in both its angle form and its arclength form, and it is a probability measure on the boundary circle. The kernel computation of steps 1.2 and 3.1 is choice-free; was used only in step 2.1 through the uniqueness theorem [F2] and in the identification of .
Depends on
- The bounded plane Dirichlet problem has at most one continuous harmonic solution
- Barriers and regular boundary points
- Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus
- A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of $\mathbb C$
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- Harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain
- The Poisson kernel on the unit disc
- Logarithmic modulus is harmonic off its centre
- A planar barrier forces the regularized Perron envelope to have the prescribed boundary limit
- Plane harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic and antiholomorphic changes of coordinate
- Existence and uniqueness of harmonic measure on a bounded regular plane domain
- The Poisson integral gives the unique continuous harmonic extension on the closed unit disc
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Boris Khoruzhenko, LTCC Potential Theory lecture notes, Sections 4.1-4.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Mikhail Lyubich, Dynamics of Quadratic Polynomials, Vol. I, Appendix 1, Sections 10.1-10.9 (standard reference, not scraped)