Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Beltrami coefficient of the inverse of an affine quasiconformal map

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let f(z)=αz+βz‾ with ∣β∣<∣α∣, so f is the affine map of The affine ellipse map and its Beltrami coefficient and μf=β/α. Put Δ=∣α∣2−∣β∣2>0. Then g(w)=f−1(w)=α‾w−βw‾Δ, and gw=α‾Δ,gw‾=−βΔ,μg=−βα‾=−μffzfz‾,∣μg∣=∣μf∣,Kg=Kf, in agreement with Composition and inversion of quasiconformal maps and their Beltrami coefficients(ii). For α=2 and β=i/2, this gives μf=i/4, Kf=5/3, g(w)=(2w−i2w‾)/(15/4), and μg=−i/4 (The Beltrami coefficient and the maximal dilatation, The Wirtinger derivatives ∂zf and ∂zˉf, and antiholomorphic functions).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Choice, α,β∈C with ∣β∣<∣α∣, and the coefficient conventions of The Beltrami coefficient and the maximal dilatation.

[F1]

The system w=αz+βzˉ, wˉ=αˉzˉ+βˉz has determinant Δ=∣α∣2−∣β∣2>0 and solving it gives z=(αˉw−βwˉ)/Δ.

[F2]

Wirtinger differentiation gives fz=α, fzˉ=β, gw=αˉ/Δ, and gwˉ=−β/Δ (The Wirtinger derivatives ∂zf and ∂zˉf, and antiholomorphic functions).

[F3]

For an analytic quasiconformal affine map, μf=fzˉ/fz and Kf=(1+∣μf∣)/(1−∣μf∣); the inverse theorem states μf−1(f(z))=−μf(z)fz/fz‾ and Kf−1=Kf (The Beltrami coefficient and the maximal dilatation, Composition and inversion of quasiconformal maps and their Beltrami coefficients, The affine ellipse map and its Beltrami coefficient).

Proof

technique · solve the two-coordinate real-linear system, differentiate the inverse, and compare its coefficient with the general inverse formula
1.1F1givenalgebra

Since ∣β∣<∣α∣, one has Δ>0. Multiplying the first equation by αˉ and subtracting β times the second gives αˉw−βwˉ=Δz, so the displayed formula for g is the inverse; the same invertible linear system gives both inverse identities.

1.2F2given

Differentiating g(w)=(αˉw−βwˉ)/Δ and f(z)=αz+βzˉ by [F2] yields gw=αˉ/Δ, gwˉ=−β/Δ, fz=α, and fzˉ=β. As α≠0, division gives μg=gwˉ/gw=−β/αˉ and μf=β/α.

2.1F3step 1.2algebra

Substituting μf=β/α and fz=α into the right side of the inverse identity in [F3] gives −(β/α)(α/αˉ)=−β/αˉ=μg, so this concrete calculation agrees with Composition and inversion of quasiconformal maps and their Beltrami coefficients(ii). Also ∣μg∣=∣β∣/∣α∣=∣μf∣; applying the formula in [F3] gives Kg=Kf.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

For α=2, β=i/2, one has Δ=4−1/4=15/4, μf=(i/2)/2=i/4, and Kf=(1+1/4)/(1−1/4)=5/3. The inverse formula becomes g(w)=(2w−i2wˉ)/(15/4) and its coefficient is −i/4, as asserted.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources