How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A boundary flux control uses the H1 trace and a different control operator
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For , realize by its unique absolutely continuous representatives, with norm . For a smooth state satisfying , , and , integration by parts gives the weak boundary load . The boundary control parameter is a scalar, equivalently for counting measure. For , its trace functional is not representable by an interior density ; for , both loads include the zero functional. Thus the boundary control space and its trace operator must be specified separately from the distributed-control space .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, the interval, the energy space , and the one-dimensional weak formulation of a Neumann boundary load.
The Axiom of Choice is assumed (The Axiom of Choice).
The control box Closed pointwise box of L2 controls consists of equivalence classes in an space over its declared measure domain; changing the domain changes the control space.
Under the Axiom of Choice, every class has a unique absolutely continuous representative on (One-dimensional functions have unique absolutely continuous representatives).
The Axiom of Choice implies Dependent Choice and Countable Choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice).
For absolutely continuous functions, integration by parts gives when Countable Choice and Dependent Choice hold (Integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions).
Cauchy--Schwarz gives (Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for dependent pairs).
Verification
By [F2], has an absolutely continuous representative. By [F3], the hypotheses of [F4] hold. Applying [F4] to and gives . Cauchy--Schwarz [F5] yields . Applying [F4] to and for a smooth state gives . Thus the boundary control operator is bounded on .
Let . Then , , and . If and for every with some , Cauchy--Schwarz [F5] gives , a contradiction. For , represents the same zero functional. The boundary input space is nevertheless the scalar space, while the distributed input space in [F1] is ; their operators and control sets must be specified separately.
Depends on
- One-dimensional $W^{1,p}$ functions have unique absolutely continuous representatives
- The Axiom of Choice
- Closed pointwise box of L2 controls
- Cauchy–Schwarz: $|\langle x,y\rangle|\le\|x\|\,\|y\|$, with equality exactly for dependent pairs
- AC implies DC implies countable choice
- Integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hannes Meinlschmidt, Optimization with Partial Differential Equations, FAU lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)