How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Comparing rational powers:
Example
(i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; hence
All bases are positive and all exponents rational, so Rational powers of a positive base applies. Clauses (i) and (ii) are instances of the two monotonicity statements of Monotonicity of and of , but (iii) is not: it compares bases against exponents in the opposite order , and neither monotonicity clause decides it.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The positive bases and and the rational exponents in .
Rational powers (Rational powers of a positive base, Existence and uniqueness of -th roots: a unique with ): for and rational the value is defined and positive, and is the unique nonnegative -th root of .
Rational power laws (Laws of rational exponents): for and rationals , and .
Monotonicity of rational powers (Monotonicity of and of ): for and rationals one has ; and for rational and one has .
Monotonicity of integer powers (Monotonicity of and of ): for , is strictly increasing on the nonnegative reals, so implies .
Integer powers (Integer powers ): and by the recursion clause and field arithmetic.
Verification
Clause (i): and in , so exponent monotonicity [L3] gives .
Clause (ii): and with both bases positive, so base monotonicity [L3] gives .
Clause (iii): raising to the sixth power, and by [L2] and [L5], and ; since and by [L1], the strict monotonicity of on the nonnegatives [L4] turns into .
Chaining (i) from step 1.1 and (iii) from step 1.3 gives , and (ii) from step 1.2 records the companion comparison ; the three claims together are the displayed order, and only clause (iii) needed the sixth-power device, since no single monotonicity statement compares with .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jiří Lebl, Basic Analysis I: Introduction to Real Analysis, Volume I, version 6.3, 15 May 2026 (author-hosted complete book) (standard reference, not scraped)