How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
and illustrate complete and complete bipartite graphs, degrees and edge counts
Example
The complete graph has degree at every vertex and has edges. The complete bipartite graph has degree at every vertex and has edges.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The standard graphs and .
contains every pair of its five vertices as an edge, while has two three-element parts and every edge between the parts (Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that and have vertices).
The sum of degrees is twice the number of edges (Handshake lemma: the sum of the vertex degrees is twice the number of edges).
Verification
Each vertex of is adjacent to the other four vertices, so its degree is ; [L1] gives .
Each vertex of is adjacent to all three vertices in the opposite part and none in its own part, so all six vertices have degree .
By [L2], , hence .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. Diestel, Graph Theory, Chapter 1 preview (standard reference, not scraped)