How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite power map of the affine line
Statement
Let be a field. For each integer , the map defines a finite morphism . On coordinate rings, sends to , and is free of rank over with basis . If divides , the generic extension is inseparable. The exponent gives the constant map , which is not finite onto the whole affine line.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the affine lines and , and the ring map with (or ).
For a base scheme the relative affine space of Schemes and morphisms over a base has over ; the affine line of this example is that scheme, , with structure morphism induced by . (Schemes and morphisms over a base)
A ring map induces the corresponding morphism (Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings).
A morphism is finite when every affine target open has affine inverse image and its coordinate algebra is module-finite (Finite morphisms of schemes).
Module-finite means finitely generated as a module over the base ring (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).
Every ideal of is principal (For every field , is a principal ideal domain).
The closed subsets of are exactly the vanishing sets (The vanishing sets define the Zariski topology on the prime spectrum; The prime spectrum and vanishing sets).
is the complement of (Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum).
The localization map identifies with (A principal localization identifies its spectrum with a distinguished open).
Elements of are fractions with denominator a power of (Principal localisation ).
is the zero ring (Principal localisation ).
A localized module fraction is zero exactly when some denominator annihilates its numerator (A localised module fraction is zero exactly when one denominator kills its numerator).
For a field , and likewise for (For a field , is its rational function field; in particular ).
The characteristic is the least positive with , when such an exists (The characteristic of a ring: the least with when one exists, and otherwise).
A positive characteristic of a field is prime (The characteristic of a field is zero or a prime number).
An element satisfying a nonzero polynomial over the base field is algebraic (Algebraic and transcendental elements and algebraic extensions).
For an algebraic element, its minimal polynomial divides every polynomial that annihilates it (The evaluation kernel and the unique monic irreducible minimal polynomial of an algebraic element).
A field extension is separable only if every element is separable (Separable algebraic elements and separable extensions).
A polynomial is separable when it has no repeated root in any extension field (Repeated roots in extension fields and separable polynomials).
Proof
For , every exponent has a unique form with and . Thus each polynomial in has a unique expression with . Existence follows by grouping its monomials by their remainder modulo ; uniqueness follows because the exponents are distinct for distinct pairs . Taking only the term also shows that the ring map , , is injective. Therefore is a free -basis of rank . [F1, algebra] 1.2 Suppose and . By [F13], , and by [F14], is prime; set , so . In the generic extension , let . It satisfies , hence is algebraic by [F15]. It is not in : if for and , then . Every exponent on the left is congruent to modulo , while every exponent on the right is divisible by ; since , equality is impossible. Let be its minimal polynomial. By [F16], . In an algebraic closure, because . Since , has degree at least ; all its roots are , so it has a repeated root. By [F17] and [F18], is inseparable over , so the generic extension is not separable. [F12, F13, F14, F15, F16, F17, F18, algebra] 1.3 For , the coordinate map is , . The -module action on factors through , so if it were finitely generated as a -module then would be finite-dimensional over . This is impossible because are linearly independent over . The finite-morphism condition already fails on the whole target affine open, so the constant map is not finite. [F3, F4, algebra] 2.1 Let be any affine open. Its closed complement is for an ideal by [F6], and [F5] writes , so by [F7]. This includes with and the whole target with . For , [F2] and [F8] identify its inverse image with and its coordinate map with . The image is nonzero by step 1.1. Every localized element is by [F9]; writing in the basis from step 1.1 shows that the localized basis spans over . To prove independence, clear the coefficient denominators in a relation. By [F11], some power of then kills the resulting numerator. The ring is a domain, since leading coefficients of nonzero polynomials over multiply to a nonzero coefficient, so this power can be cancelled. The original basis independence then makes every coefficient zero. Thus the localized algebra is module-finite over . If , [F10] gives the zero coordinate ring on the empty inverse image and empty target open, and the zero module is finite. By [F3] and [F4], these checks on every affine target open prove finiteness. [F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11, step 1.1, algebra] 3.1 At , the basis is and the map is the identity; the generic extension is and is separable. The proof uses no choice: the basis is explicit, an arbitrary affine target open is handled one at a time, and the characteristic argument uses one explicit element. The empty target open is handled in step 2.1, and there is no empty-source case or interval endpoint. The source is nonempty because is a domain and is prime. [F12, step 1.1, step 2.1, step 1.2, step 1.3]
Depends on
- For every field $F$, $F[x]$ is a principal ideal domain
- For a field $F$, $F(t)=\operatorname{Frac}(F[t])$ is its rational function field; in particular $\mathbb R(t)=\operatorname{Frac}(\mathbb R[t])$
- The underlying space of an affine spectrum
- Algebraic and transcendental elements and algebraic extensions
- Finite morphisms of schemes
- Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras
- Principal localisation $R_f=\{1,f,f^2,\ldots\}^{-1}R$
- The prime spectrum and vanishing sets
- Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum
- Repeated roots in extension fields and separable polynomials
- The characteristic of a ring: the least $n \ge 1$ with $n \cdot 1_R = 0$ when one exists, and $0$ otherwise
- Schemes and morphisms over a base
- Separable algebraic elements and separable extensions
- The vanishing sets define the Zariski topology on the prime spectrum
- A principal localization identifies its spectrum with a distinguished open
- A localised module fraction is zero exactly when one denominator kills its numerator
- Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings
- The characteristic of a field is zero or a prime number
- The evaluation kernel and the unique monic irreducible minimal polynomial of an algebraic element
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Definition 29.45.1 (tag 01WH) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, 2011 public draft, §8.3.6 Example 1: Branched covers (standard reference, not scraped)