Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite power map of the affine line

Statement

Let k be a field. For each integer n≥1, the map t↦tn defines a finite morphism Ak1→Ak1. On coordinate rings, k[s]→k[t] sends s to tn, and k[t] is free of rank n over k[s] with basis 1,t,…,tn−1. If char⁡(k)=p>0 divides n, the generic extension k(t)/k(s) is inseparable. The exponent n=0 gives the constant map t↦1, which is not finite onto the whole affine line.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the affine lines Ak1=Spec⁡k[s] and Spec⁡k[t], and the ring map φn:k[s]→k[t] with φn(s)=tn (or φ0(s)=1).

[F1]

For a base scheme S the relative affine space AS1 of Schemes and morphisms over a base has ASpec⁡A1=Spec⁡A[t] over Spec⁡A; the affine line Ak1 of this example is that scheme, Spec⁡k[t], with structure morphism induced by k↪k[t]. (Schemes and morphisms over a base)

[F2]

A ring map A→B induces the corresponding morphism Spec⁡B→Spec⁡A (Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings).

[F3]

A morphism is finite when every affine target open has affine inverse image and its coordinate algebra is module-finite (Finite morphisms of schemes).

[F4]

Module-finite means finitely generated as a module over the base ring (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).

[F5]

Every ideal of k[s] is principal (For every field F, F[x] is a principal ideal domain).

[F6]

The closed subsets of Spec⁡A are exactly the vanishing sets V(I) (The vanishing sets define the Zariski topology on the prime spectrum; The prime spectrum and vanishing sets).

[F7]

D(g) is the complement of V((g)) (Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum).

[F8]

The localization map identifies D(g) with Spec⁡Ag (A principal localization identifies its spectrum with a distinguished open).

[F9]

Elements of Ag are fractions with denominator a power of g (Principal localisation Rf={1,f,f2,…}−1R).

[F11]

A localized module fraction is zero exactly when some denominator annihilates its numerator (A localised module fraction is zero exactly when one denominator kills its numerator).

[F13]

The characteristic is the least positive m with m⋅1k=0, when such an m exists (The characteristic of a ring: the least n≥1 with n⋅1R=0 when one exists, and 0 otherwise).

[F14]

A positive characteristic of a field is prime (The characteristic of a field is zero or a prime number).

[F15]

An element satisfying a nonzero polynomial over the base field is algebraic (Algebraic and transcendental elements and algebraic extensions).

[F16]

For an algebraic element, its minimal polynomial divides every polynomial that annihilates it (The evaluation kernel and the unique monic irreducible minimal polynomial of an algebraic element).

[F17]

A field extension is separable only if every element is separable (Separable algebraic elements and separable extensions).

[F18]

A polynomial is separable when it has no repeated root in any extension field (Repeated roots in extension fields and separable polynomials).

Proof

technique · direct exponent calculation, followed by localization
1.1

For n≥1, every exponent m≥0 has a unique form m=qn+i with q≥0 and 0≤i<n. Thus each polynomial in k[t] has a unique expression ∑i=0n−1fi(tn)ti with fi∈k[s]. Existence follows by grouping its monomials by their remainder modulo n; uniqueness follows because the exponents qn+i are distinct for distinct pairs (q,i). Taking only the i=0 term also shows that the ring map k[s]→k[t], s↦tn, is injective. Therefore 1,t,…,tn−1 is a free k[s]-basis of rank n. [F1, algebra] 1.2 Suppose char⁡(k)=p>0 and p∣n. By [F13], p⋅1k=0, and by [F14], p is prime; set r=n/p, so 0<r<n. In the generic extension k(s)⊆k(t), let α=tr. It satisfies αp=s, hence is algebraic by [F15]. It is not in k(s): if tr=P(tn)/Q(tn) for P,Q∈k[s] and Q≠0, then trQ(tn)=P(tn). Every exponent on the left is congruent to r modulo n, while every exponent on the right is divisible by n; since 0<r<n, equality is impossible. Let mα be its minimal polynomial. By [F16], mα∣Xp−s. In an algebraic closure, Xp−s=(X−α)p because αp=s. Since α∉k(s), mα has degree at least 2; all its roots are α, so it has a repeated root. By [F17] and [F18], α is inseparable over k(s), so the generic extension is not separable. [F12, F13, F14, F15, F16, F17, F18, algebra] 1.3 For n=0, the coordinate map is k[s]→k[t], s↦1. The k[s]-module action on k[t] factors through k[s]/(s−1)≅k, so if it were finitely generated as a k[s]-module then k[t] would be finite-dimensional over k. This is impossible because 1,t,t2,… are linearly independent over k. The finite-morphism condition already fails on the whole target affine open, so the constant map is not finite. [F3, F4, algebra] 2.1 Let U⊆Spec⁡k[s] be any affine open. Its closed complement is V(I) for an ideal I by [F6], and [F5] writes I=(g), so U=D(g) by [F7]. This includes U=∅ with g=0 and the whole target with g=1. For g≠0, [F2] and [F8] identify its inverse image with D(g(tn))=Spec⁡k[t]g(tn) and its coordinate map with k[s]g→k[t]g(tn). The image g(tn) is nonzero by step 1.1. Every localized element is h(t)/g(tn)N by [F9]; writing h in the basis from step 1.1 shows that the localized basis spans over k[s]g. To prove independence, clear the coefficient denominators in a relation. By [F11], some power of g(tn) then kills the resulting numerator. The ring k[t] is a domain, since leading coefficients of nonzero polynomials over k multiply to a nonzero coefficient, so this power can be cancelled. The original basis independence then makes every coefficient zero. Thus the localized algebra is module-finite over k[s]g. If g=0, [F10] gives the zero coordinate ring on the empty inverse image and empty target open, and the zero module is finite. By [F3] and [F4], these checks on every affine target open prove finiteness. [F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11, step 1.1, algebra] 3.1 At n=1, the basis is {1} and the map is the identity; the generic extension is k(t)/k(t) and is separable. The proof uses no choice: the basis is explicit, an arbitrary affine target open is handled one at a time, and the characteristic argument uses one explicit element. The empty target open is handled in step 2.1, and there is no empty-source case or interval endpoint. The source is nonempty because k[t] is a domain and (0) is prime. [F12, step 1.1, step 2.1, step 1.2, step 1.3] □

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources