How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Geodesics of a Riemannian product
Example
Let and be boundaryless Riemannian manifolds, let be an interval with nonempty interior, and give the product metric . A smooth curve is an affinely parametrized geodesic if and only if both and are affinely parametrized geodesics with the same parameter . “Same affine parameter” does not require the two factor speeds to be equal.
In particular, product geodesics defined on all of are exactly pairs of all-real factor geodesics with their common affine time. If, in addition, is assumed and are nonempty and connected, then is metrically, equivalently geodesically, complete if and only if both factors are.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two boundaryless Riemannian manifolds, product metric, interval, and smooth curve in the example.
The Axiom of Countable Choice () is assumed only for the final completeness consequence.
In the supplied product coordinates, a tangent vector is a pair , and the stipulated metric evaluates on pairs as . Hence its matrix is , with inverse . This follows directly from the metric in the Example statement.
Fundamental theorem of riemannian geometry supplies the unique Levi--Civita connection of the product metric without a choice assumption, and Christoffel formula for the levi civita connection computes its symbols from the metric matrix.
Coordinate geodesic equation says that vanishing of all coordinate expressions is equivalent to the intrinsic affinely parametrized geodesic equation, including on chart subintervals and at included parameter endpoints.
Under [A1], A Riemannian product is complete iff each factor is complete gives the metric and geodesic completeness equivalences for a finite family of nonempty connected boundaryless Riemannian manifolds.
Verification
Choose product coordinates and write for the full product-metric matrix. By [F1], the metric and its inverse have matrices In particular, has no -dependence, has no -dependence, and every mixed metric coefficient is zero.
By [F2], the Christoffel formula applied to the first block gives , and its application to the second gives . Every symbol whose indices meet both blocks vanishes. For example, and the cases with an upper -index are identical with the two factors exchanged. Thus the product Levi--Civita symbols are precisely the two factor families, with zero mixed symbols.
Write the coordinate functions of and as and . Substituting step 2.1 into [F3], the product geodesic equations split into the two independent systems These are exactly the coordinate geodesic equations for and , evaluated at the same value of .
If is a geodesic, [F3] and step 3.1 make both factor systems vanish, so and are geodesics with the same affine parameter.
Conversely, if both factor curves are geodesics in the supplied parameter, both systems in step 3.1 vanish on every product-chart subinterval, and [F3] makes a product geodesic. Taking in steps 4.1--4.2 proves the all-real assertion in both directions.
Under the additional hypotheses stated there, [A1] and [F4] applied to the two-factor family give the completeness consequence. The geodesic iff in steps 1.1--4.2 itself uses no choice: all coordinates and the curve are supplied, and the Levi--Civita connection is uniquely determined. If either factor is empty, there is no supplied curve from a nonempty interval and the universal iff is vacuous; the conditional completeness clause explicitly excludes that case. A zero-dimensional factor contributes an empty coordinate system and a locally constant component, while a one-dimensional factor contributes its single geodesic equation. Constant components, including two constant components, satisfy their factor equations, so all degenerate cases are included. Included endpoints use the one-sided convention in [F3]. Steps 4.1 and 4.2 respectively establish the forward and reverse implications, and neither direction changes or independently rescales the common parameter.
Source locator
Datar, Example 8.2.8, printed p.49, explicitly supplies the product manifold, the fibrewise tangent splitting , and the product metric . It does not state the split Levi--Civita connection, the product-geodesic equivalence, or the completeness equivalence. The first two claims are derived in steps 1.1--4.2 from the cited local coordinate formulas, and the final conditional claim is invoked in step 5.1 from the already-authored product-completeness proposition.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry, Example 8.2.8, p.49 (standard reference, not scraped)