Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Grassmannians from unitary symplectic reduction

Example

Let 1≤k≤n and let M=Ck×n with the real inner product ⟨X,Y⟩=Re⁡tr⁡(X∗Y) and the symplectic form

ω(X,Y)=Im⁡tr⁡(X∗Y),

and let U(k) act on the left by matrix multiplication, g⋅A=gA. Then, with u(k)∗ identified with u(k) through the inner product,

μ(A)=−i2AA∗+λiI(λ>0)

is an equivariant moment map. Its zero level is the scaled Stiefel manifold {A:AA∗=2λI}, on which U(k) acts freely and properly, and the reduction is the Grassmannian

M0={A:AA∗=2λI}/U(k)=Gr⁡(k,n),

of dimension 2k(n−k), carrying the reduced form characterised by π∗ωλred=ι∗ω. Under the common row-space identification of all these quotients with Gr⁡(k,n), the form depends linearly on the level: if ωGr⁡:=ω1/2red is the unit-frame normalization, then ωλred=2λ ωGr⁡.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, integers 1≤k≤n, the space M=Ck×n with the forms above, the left action of U(k), and λ>0.

[F1]

U(k) is a Lie group with Lie algebra u(k)={X:X∗+X=0} by Unitary and special unitary Lie groups. It is compact: inside Mk(C)≅R2k2 the equation A∗A=I defines a closed set, and it is bounded because ∑i,j∣Aij∣2=tr⁡(A∗A)=k; Heine--Borel now applies (Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line).

[F2]

ω(X,Y)=Im⁡tr⁡(X∗Y) is a symplectic form on the real vector space M, since it is an alternating bilinear form with ω(X,iX)=∥X∥2>0. [algebra]

[F3]

The fundamental field of ξ∈u(k) is ξM(A)=ddt∣0e−tξA=−ξA. Fundamental vector fields for a left action.

[F4]

The coadjoint action of U(k) on u(k)∗ corresponds under the invariant inner product to H↦gHg−1, so central elements are fixed. The coadjoint representation, action and orbits.

[F5]

The reduction theorem applies when the value is regular and the stabilizer acts freely and properly; regularity is equivalent to local freeness on the level, and the reduced dimension is dim⁡M−dim⁡G−dim⁡Gα. Marsden--Weinstein--Meyer symplectic reduction, Regularity of a moment map is equivalent to local freeness, The dimension of a regular reduced space at a nonzero value.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F2F3

For ξ∈u(k) and X∈TAM=M, using [F3] and (ξA)∗=A∗ξ∗=−A∗ξ, ω(ξM(A),X)=Im⁡tr⁡((−ξA)∗X)=Im⁡tr⁡(A∗ξX).

2.1step 1.1F1F2

With μ(A)=−i2AA∗+λiI we have μ(A)∗=−μ(A), so μ(A)∈u(k) and the component is μξ(A)=⟨μ(A),ξ⟩=Re⁡tr⁡(μ(A)∗ξ); its derivative in the direction X picks up i2(XA∗+AX∗) and, using tr⁡(X∗ξA)=−tr⁡(A∗ξX)‾ together with cyclicity, equals dμAξ(X)=−Im⁡tr⁡(A∗ξX)=−ω(ξM(A),X). Hence the component moment equations hold.

3.1step 2.1F4

Equivariance: μ(gA)=−i2gAA∗g−1+λiI=gμ(A)g−1, which is the coadjoint action by [F4]; the added central term λiI is fixed. Hence μ is an equivariant moment map.

4.1step 3.1F1F5

The zero level is μ−1(0)={A:AA∗=2λI}: it is nonempty because k≤n and contains A=2λ(Ik 0). If gA=A on this level, then g=gAA∗(2λ)−1=AA∗(2λ)−1=I, so the action is free; [F5] therefore makes 0 a regular value. The action is proper because U(k) is compact, so the zero level is an embedded submanifold and reduction applies.

5.1step 4.1

Quotient: two frames A,A′ with AA∗=A′A∗=2λI lie in the same U(k)-orbit exactly when their rows span the same k-plane, so the quotient is the Grassmannian Gr⁡(k,n) of k-planes in Cn.

6.1step 5.1F2F5algebra∎

Dimension check: dim⁡M=2kn and dim⁡G=dim⁡G0=k2 because 0 is a central coadjoint value, so by [F5] dim⁡M0=2kn−2k2=2k(n−k), the dimension of Gr⁡(k,n). For the form, let Sλ(A)=2λ A carry the unit-frame level AA∗=I onto the level AA∗=2λI. This map is U(k)-equivariant, preserves row spaces, and satisfies Sλ∗ω=2λ ω. Pulling the two reduction identities back along Sλ therefore gives Sˉλ∗ωλred=2λ ω1/2red on the common Grassmannian quotient. Thus, with ωGr⁡:=ω1/2red, the reduced form at level λ is 2λ ωGr⁡, rather than one fixed form for every λ.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

70 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources